Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 135
Posts: 135   Pages: 14   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 143196 times and has 134 replies Next Thread
Jim1348
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 13, 2009
Post Count: 1066
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: WU Availability

This is a long-term effect that I have noted before. It could be that they have reached the limit of what they can reasonably do. With the declining cost of silicon solar cells, there may not be much market space left for the organic cells. If Harvard wants to present their case I would listen, but they have not chosen to do so in some time, which says something, to me at least.
[Feb 8, 2016 6:39:14 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
SekeRob
Master Cruncher
Joined: Jan 7, 2013
Post Count: 2741
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: WU Availability

Harvard is preparing another group of work units to run. In order to make sure we don't run out of work units in the meantime, we've lowered the feeder priority for CEP2. Any "no work available" messages should be transient if your client happens to catch the feeder before it is restocked. The new feeder priority should only be temporary until the next group of work units is available.

Seippel

Thanks for telling, and to launch into the banana question: Why did this information not get shared when you set the slowdown?... members notice, someone always does, you know, and days of speculation went before, and probably a few good computing days went sailing to never be re-gained. [IBM should know that delayed income is lost income]
[Feb 9, 2016 1:21:07 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Gatchaman
Cruncher
Joined: Feb 29, 2012
Post Count: 49
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: WU Availability

Harvard............... The new feeder priority should only be temporary until the next group of work units is available.

Seippel

And how are we supposed to know when that happens ?
Still not turning my boxes back on until you guys say you are 100% back up and running.
----------------------------------------

"Sadly this project is turning into nonscience......"
[Feb 9, 2016 5:38:09 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Dayle Diamond
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Jan 31, 2013
Post Count: 447
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: WU Availability

Gatchaman, I can think of a few projects that would be very lucky to have your crunching power in the meantime.

Please consider checking only the Box for CEP2 and "If there is no work available for the project(s) I have selected above, please send me work from another project."

If you can't see yourself excited for any of our other projects, think of it as removing projects from today's shared pool so that future allocations will lean a little harder on CEP2.
[Feb 9, 2016 7:18:23 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Gatchaman
Cruncher
Joined: Feb 29, 2012
Post Count: 49
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: WU Availability

Gatchaman, I can think of a few projects that would be very lucky to have your crunching power in the meantim.....................................ns will lean a little harder on CEP2.


I pray for the day when we can ALL help to crunch for other WCG by simply plugging in a tablet such as a Hudl2 into a CEP ;-) solar panel and crunch away for free. I have four of these tabs all with broken screens so they were being sold for cheap as spares or repairs. Powered by a quad core Z3735D it still packs quite a processing punch. Low power tablet cluster anyone? I could set those to crunch for other WCG projects.

In all seriousness though I've been informed that in the next 12 or so months I'm about to lose the space I use for my crunching boxes at work so I need to maximise the limited time I have left to crunch CEP WU's. Sadly CEP is not just a plug'n'crunch project. CEP takes total dedication to crunch for and that fact needs to be advertised more. It's sold to the public with no warning that on certain equipment WU's can take 18+ hours to crunch. A quick scan of the details of CEP and this is all I could find
" Why is Phase 2 of the Clean Energy Project an opt-in project?

These calculations require work units that may run longer, have higher memory, disk space and data transfer requirements. Therefore, we are providing the users the option to opt-in to the project."
That warning is just a bit too vague in my books and WU's resetting back to zero puts amateur CEP crunchers off as it is. As a noob cruncher for CEP I had no idea the check points were so sparse to begin with and complained like other noobs have, and still do to this day :-).
The funny thing is I've just bought my first rack server! 2X E5620 and 8GB DR3. I've never set up a raid before so the next few days/weeks will be fun getting it up and running just so long as I can get my hands on some ultra ultra cheap ssd drives.

I promise to dedicate my boxes to other WCG projects just as soon as CEP ends.
----------------------------------------

"Sadly this project is turning into nonscience......"
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Gatchaman at Feb 12, 2016 7:12:52 PM]
[Feb 10, 2016 4:42:31 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Jim1348
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 13, 2009
Post Count: 1066
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: WU Availability

Sadly CEP is not just a plug'n'crunch project. CEP takes total dedication to crunch for and that fact needs to be advertised more. It's sold to the public with no warning that on certain equipment WU's can take 18+ hours to crunch. A quick scan of the details of CEP and this is all I could find
" Why is Phase 2 of the Clean Energy Project an opt-in project?

These calculations require work units that may run longer, have higher memory, disk space and data transfer requirements. Therefore, we are providing the users the option to opt-in to the project."
That warning is just a bit too vague in my books and WU's resetting back to zero puts amateur CEP crunchers off as it is. As a noob cruncher for CEP I had no idea the check points were so spars to begin with and complained like other noobs have, and still do to this day :-).

I guess I have been around here too long, since I am only too well aware of the above limitations. But you are right that a new user might not pick up on all the requirements. In any case, we need some communications whether all the hardware we have put together should be put out to pasture elsewhere, or whether it will be needed again for CEP2. I am happy to crunch other WCG projects, but I might change my hardware around a little if I knew what they were going to give us.
[Feb 10, 2016 6:23:11 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Paul Schlaffer
Senior Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jun 12, 2005
Post Count: 240
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: WU Availability

Gatchaman,

CEP is also my primary project at moment. I can relay I have had no lack of CEP work since the afternoon of the 8th.
----------------------------------------

“Where an excess of power prevails, property of no sort is duly respected. No man is safe in his opinions, his person, his faculties, or his possessions.” – James Madison (1792)
[Feb 11, 2016 3:03:23 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Punchy
Advanced Cruncher
Texas
Joined: Nov 30, 2010
Post Count: 60
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: WU Availability

Gatchaman,

CEP is also my primary project at moment. I can relay I have had no lack of CEP work since the afternoon of the 8th.

+1, with the caveat that for me this applies to Windows only. I've been trying on and off for weeks to get CEP2 on Linux with no luck. That's unfortunate because I believe Linux has better memory management, particularly integration of filesystem cache and ramdisk, so I could handle more work with less memory than Windows demands.
----------------------------------------

[Feb 11, 2016 2:16:21 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
SekeRob
Master Cruncher
Joined: Jan 7, 2013
Post Count: 2741
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: WU Availability

Comments like these always raise the question: Can we see your Linux BOINC event log, from client startup to where the messages start to deny the work provision?

Next week, 16th I'll be firing up my Ubuntu 14.04LTS with 3.16 kernel to major upgrade to the 4.2 LTS kernel which has significant file/disk handling improvements. Then will test CEP2 again, with which I did not have the greatest experience on Linux... better computing lost against poor i/o to swap and storage, net poorer efficiency than under W7 64 bits (though Ce is only 32 bits) .
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by SekeRob* at Feb 11, 2016 2:56:34 PM]
[Feb 11, 2016 2:55:59 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Gatchaman
Cruncher
Joined: Feb 29, 2012
Post Count: 49
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: WU Availability

Thanks for the info.
Powered up the boxes so my minuscule tears of crunched WU's can add to CEP's sea of results so far.

Think I'm going to have to convert these boxes to Linux soon. If only I knew how...... Have to bleed every ounce of power out of these guys before it's game over so to speak. And will raiding ssd's on a 4GB 775 system make any difference to performance? Obviously there isn't enough room for a ram drive so raid is the next best thing, no?

And.... http://cleanenergy.molecularspace.org/news/
Hasn't been updated in a while.
----------------------------------------

"Sadly this project is turning into nonscience......"
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Gatchaman at Feb 13, 2016 12:41:24 AM]
[Feb 12, 2016 7:41:03 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 135   Pages: 14   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread