| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Community
Forum: Chat Room
Thread: Credits for Trusted Crunchers |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 6
|
|
| Author |
|
|
X86power
Cruncher Joined: Oct 20, 2014 Post Count: 12 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Hello crunchers I was just thinking about the fact that it's not fair if your PC or PC's have earned trusted status where you are consistently returning good results and beginning to receive work where the minimum quorum is only 1. I think those crunchers have earned the right to get double or triple the credits for the value of work their trusted PC's are contributing to the project what does everyone think??
|
|||
|
||||
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7846 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
The trusted status is transitory. Leave this topic alone. The question of points has already been thrashed enough.
----------------------------------------Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
|
twilyth
Master Cruncher US Joined: Mar 30, 2007 Post Count: 2130 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Points allocations have to be seen as being fair and not favoring particular contributors or projects.
----------------------------------------There are a lot of possible justifications for allocating points differently than the current process. But any sort of bias being introduced to the system is going to be perceived by most people as unfair. I think my machines would probably qualify for the bonus you propose, but it's more important to me that other people interested in WCG not be put off by thinking that we play favorites. Perception is reality in the vast number of situations so even if you can make an argument for something being fair, it also has to be perceived as fair.   |
||
|
|
X86power
Cruncher Joined: Oct 20, 2014 Post Count: 12 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Well I'm a little confused with the term favouritism which I would say is more closely related to nepotism, undeserved preferential treatment. I'm talking about the value of integrity which I guess is not really valued in this organization oh well I can live with that... lesson learned thanks for the replies anyways.
|
||
|
|
KLiK
Master Cruncher Croatia Joined: Nov 13, 2006 Post Count: 3108 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Well I'm a little confused with the term favouritism which I would say is more closely related to nepotism, undeserved preferential treatment. I'm talking about the value of integrity which I guess is not really valued in this organization oh well I can live with that... lesson learned thanks for the replies anyways. an idea comes to mind...make a WCG badges with logo & put the on profiles! as a good 1y or 45d of 10y member - u get badge with a color, just like profile! no preferences here...just a point of appreciation!  |
||
|
|
Skivelitis2
Advanced Cruncher USA Joined: Mar 21, 2015 Post Count: 113 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Well I'm a little confused with the term favouritism which I would say is more closely related to nepotism, undeserved preferential treatment. I'm talking about the value of integrity which I guess is not really valued in this organization oh well I can live with that... lesson learned thanks for the replies anyways. an idea comes to mind...make a WCG badges with logo & put the on profiles! as a good 1y or 45d of 10y member - u get badge with a color, just like profile! no preferences here...just a point of appreciation! +1  |
||
|
|
|