Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 47
Posts: 47   Pages: 5   [ 1 2 3 4 5 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 8021 times and has 46 replies Next Thread
Sandvika
Advanced Cruncher
United Kingdom
Joined: Apr 27, 2007
Post Count: 112
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
confused Collapsing points claims on OET1

I've noticed that the points my BOINC clients are claiming and receiving for OET1 are in rapid decline. It's on all my devices, which have now all earned reliability and thus usually no longer have wingman to average out their claims.

Here are 2 examples which have got to about 2 points per hour. A third example is where I was wingman and you can see the huge mismatch in the claims. This is going to reduce my points haul to about 1.5K per day, when it has been averaging about 70K per day on all other projects (and indeed on the first phase of OET in December).

Any ideas as to why this is happening an what can be done about it? I could switch to another project but with health workers in West Africa risking their lives every day to contain this disease, to me this project has an immediacy not matched by any other.

Thanks

Workunit Status


Project Name: Outsmart Ebola Together
Created: 02/11/2015 12:50:34
Name: OET1_0000331_xEBGP-OM_rig_8117
Minimum Quorum: 1
Replication: 1


Result Name App Version Number Status Sent Time Time Due /
Return Time CPU Time / Elapsed Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit
OET1_0000331_xEBGP-OM_rig_8117_0-- 719 Valid 11/02/15 12:57:26 15/02/15 10:06:04 22.11 50.2 / 50.2



Workunit Status


Project Name: Outsmart Ebola Together
Created: 02/11/2015 12:50:35
Name: OET1_0000331_xEBGP-OM_rig_8344
Minimum Quorum: 1
Replication: 1


Result Name App Version Number Status Sent Time Time Due /
Return Time CPU Time / Elapsed Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit
OET1_0000331_xEBGP-OM_rig_8344_0-- 719 Valid 11/02/15 12:57:26 15/02/15 07:54:40 16.34 31.3 / 31.3


Workunit Status


Project Name: Outsmart Ebola Together
Created: 02/10/2015 20:38:43
Name: OET1_0000328_xZAGP-FA_rig_6996
Minimum Quorum: 2
Replication: 2


Result Name App Version Number Status Sent Time Time Due /
Return Time CPU Time / Elapsed Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit
OET1_ 0000328_ xZAGP-FA_ rig_ 6996_ 1-- 719 Valid 11/02/15 02:28:59 15/02/15 03:53:03 4.94 12.6 / 52.6
OET1_ 0000328_ xZAGP-FA_ rig_ 6996_ 0-- 719 Valid 11/02/15 02:28:52 12/02/15 04:45:00 3.74 92.7 / 52.6

----------------------------------------

[Feb 15, 2015 7:37:23 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
jonnieb-uk
Ace Cruncher
England
Joined: Nov 30, 2011
Post Count: 6105
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Collapsing points claims on OET1

The Points are falling because BOINC doesn't cope well with science projects with variable WU runtimes.
----------------------------------------

To Join follow this link: Join the UK Team All Welcome! UK Team thread
[Feb 15, 2015 7:57:15 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 4, 2006
Post Count: 7844
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Collapsing points claims on OET1

I am still seeing way more points on OET1 than I probably deserve. Linux Mint Core2Duo 2.66ghz.Here is a sample:
OET1_ 0000461_ xZAGP-FW_ rig_ 7465_ 0-- Valid 2/15/15 06:24:32 2/15/15 13:11:25 0.14 / 0.16 27.5 / 15.7
OET1_ 0000461_ xZAGP-FW_ rig_ 6585_ 0-- Valid 2/15/15 06:03:19 2/15/15 12:48:17 0.12 / 0.13 21.3 / 22.3
OET1_ 0000461_ xZAGP-FW_ rig_ 6587_ 0-- Valid 2/15/15 06:03:19 2/15/15 12:46:08 0.12 / 0.13 21.5 / 13.5
OET1_ 0000461_ xZAGP-FW_ rig_ 8382_ 0-- Valid 2/15/15 05:44:52 2/15/15 12:30:11 0.12 / 0.12 20.7 / 12.8
OET1_ 0000461_ xZAGP-FW_ rig_ 30394_ 0-- Valid 2/15/15 05:38:06 2/15/15 12:21:56 0.12 / 0.13 21.3 / 11.7
OET1_ 0000461_ xZAGP-FW_ rig_ 25731_ 0-- Valid 2/15/15 05:35:56 2/15/15 12:24:06 0.18 / 0.19 31.0 / 19.5
OET1_ 0000461_ xZAGP-FW_ rig_ 17543_ 0-- Valid 2/15/15 05:31:35 2/15/15 12:14:11 0.12 / 0.13 20.1 / 12.3

Cheers

Edit:spelling
----------------------------------------
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers*
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Sgt.Joe at Feb 15, 2015 10:59:56 PM]
[Feb 15, 2015 10:58:39 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
KWSN-A Shrubbery
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Jan 8, 2006
Post Count: 476
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Collapsing points claims on OET1

I stopped worrying about points a long time ago. If points were the primary driver WGC is close to the worst place to be. Other projects "pay" far more.

This is where I dedicate ALL my CPU power because I think it will do good. I focus on run-time over points. Sure, you can have a fleet of ancient machines slowly chugging away to manipulate the totals, but a single 24 thread machine will wipe the floor on such users. Besides, a person would only be cheating themselves.

The points go up, the points go down, it all averages in the end.
----------------------------------------

[Feb 16, 2015 12:15:50 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 4, 2006
Post Count: 7844
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Collapsing points claims on OET1

I stopped worrying about points a long time ago. If points were the primary driver WGC is close to the worst place to be. Other projects "pay" far more.

This is where I dedicate ALL my CPU power because I think it will do good. I focus on run-time over points. Sure, you can have a fleet of ancient machines slowly chugging away to manipulate the totals, but a single 24 thread machine will wipe the floor on such users. Besides, a person would only be cheating themselves.

The points go up, the points go down, it all averages in the end.

I agree. The points will not buy a cup of coffee, but they are fun to watch. The important thing is the units get crunched so the research gets done.
Cheers
----------------------------------------
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers*
[Feb 16, 2015 1:41:54 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
DadX
Advanced Cruncher
Joined: Sep 9, 2006
Post Count: 56
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Collapsing points claims on OET1

Sgt. Joe and KWSN-A Shrubbery,
I believe the points are very important. The person with the most points at the end gets.... well.... errr... OK, they get nothing. Except maybe an acknowledgment of their contribution.
History has shown that in the long run people stay involved when they're credited for their effort. Be it money, points or gold stars people want some sort of measure of their involvement. The credit system really does need to be looked at.

DadX

BTW - Some of us have little but older "value" machines with which to contribute. I did retire my P4's some years ago, but I do have Raspberry and Android machines working on other projects.
----------------------------------------

[Feb 16, 2015 2:28:19 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Collapsing points claims on OET1

While I won't claim to have a full grasp on how points work, I'm guessing the issue is that the super short ~10 minute OET tasks tend to get 10-20 points each while the moderate ~1 hour tasks tend to get 30-40 points. The calculation appears to be skewed a bit on short tasks, since you can get double the points with short tasks completed within the same timeframe of a moderate task.

I had an amazing spike in points yesterday because I had almost all short OET tasks, but today the daily total dropped almost back to normal (compared to crunching long 12+ hour OETs for a few days and all UGM before that) with almost all moderate OET tasks all day.

So I guess the issue lies with calculating points on the short tasks, and those were the ones being crunched yesterday.

But yeah, in the end it doesn't matter all that much. Run time per day is more interesting to me anyway, even though that has the flaw of not representing actual computational power.
[Feb 16, 2015 6:16:16 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sabrina Tarson
Advanced Cruncher
United States
Joined: Jun 27, 2012
Post Count: 149
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Collapsing points claims on OET1

I focus on the amount of results myself.
----------------------------------------
[Feb 16, 2015 7:48:19 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
cjslman
Master Cruncher
Mexico
Joined: Nov 23, 2004
Post Count: 2082
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Collapsing points claims on OET1

My 2 cents worth... biggrin

CJSL

Crunching for a better world...
----------------------------------------
I follow the Gimli philosophy: "Keep breathing. That's the key. Breathe."
Join The Cahuamos Team


[Feb 16, 2015 12:42:29 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Collapsing points claims on OET1

The army chief ;P

Where would the points rate in [negative topic] frequency on the WCG forums?

Though it's basically meaningless, to me, how many results in a day, 24 hours is still 24 hours, had 626 validated yesterday and jumped rank from 1992 to 1983 on that scale. shhh
[Feb 16, 2015 12:52:59 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 47   Pages: 5   [ 1 2 3 4 5 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread