Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 253
Posts: 253   Pages: 26   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 46792 times and has 252 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - Nov 27, 2014 [ Issues thread ]

All my batch 0000035 units are now in PVal state. All were suspended once with LAIM off. The Result Logs show "Quit requested: Exiting" at that point, followed by a resume at the start of the Task that was running when the previous checkpoint had taken place (from the Event Log). Is that the correct behaviour?

PS Keith - you might have intended a quorum of one, but they look like quorum of 2 to me; or maybe you meant to write quorum of 2, hehe confused
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Nov 27, 2014 9:32:55 PM]
[Nov 27, 2014 9:25:40 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
widdershins
Veteran Cruncher
Scotland
Joined: Apr 30, 2007
Post Count: 677
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - Nov 27, 2014 [ Issues thread ]

Are they all gone? I was out this evening and when I got in I fired up a couple of part-timers to try and hook another couple to add to the 4 I've already bagged. But no luck so far. :(
[Nov 27, 2014 9:34:10 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
OldChap
Veteran Cruncher
UK
Joined: Jun 5, 2009
Post Count: 978
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - Nov 27, 2014 [ Issues thread ]

All seemed to checkpoint once. checkpointing revised to 60 seconds for this.

all seemed to re-start after suspend (LAIM off) Done before checkpoint.

poor efficiency observed typically losing 2.5 minutes or more every 20 mins of realtime up to 5 mins in 25 mins of realtime. cpu% in low 80's as observed in boinctasks.

e5-2650 Linux mint 17
----------------------------------------

[Nov 27, 2014 9:40:04 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - Nov 27, 2014 [ Issues thread ]

Obscure math:

'It will have over 5500 work units with a quorum of one. There could be over 11,000 results sent for this beta test.'
[Nov 27, 2014 10:04:16 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - Nov 27, 2014 [ Issues thread ]

All other tasks finished, this one got stuck at 1,667% without checkpoints, cpu time counting up:
7.04 Beta Test BETA_OET1_0000300_xMBGP-FA_rig_0041_1 01:49:44 (01:42:13) [0] 01:42:13 93,16 1,667 05:18:21 07-12-2014 21:15 Running linux_64-gny 30.58 MB 33.73 MB

This machine had also reported 2 jobs with cpu time reset:
World Community Grid 7.04 Beta Test BETA_OET1_0000035_xMBGP_4754_1 00:42:14 (00:00:33) 27-11-2014 21:56 27-11-2014 21:57 1,30 Reported: OK * linux_64-gny 48.73 MB 45.41 MB
World Community Grid 7.04 Beta Test BETA_OET1_0000035_xMBGP_3264_1 00:33:32 (00:00:25) 27-11-2014 21:14 27-11-2014 21:18 1,24 Reported: OK linux_64-gny 42.49 MB 39.15 MB

The other tasks reported as normal.
[Nov 27, 2014 10:12:58 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - Nov 27, 2014 [ Issues thread ]

Obscure math:
Keith was just checking whether you'd notice devilish
[Nov 27, 2014 10:15:59 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
widdershins
Veteran Cruncher
Scotland
Joined: Apr 30, 2007
Post Count: 677
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - Nov 27, 2014 [ Issues thread ]

Perhaps a high failure rate with lots of resends is expected.

5,500 units with 2,200 errors/too late etc.
2,200 resends with 1,100 still errors
1,100 resends with 1,100 errors
1,100 resends with 1,100 errors
1,100 resends with 1,100 errors
1,100 resends with 1,100 errors
11,000 results from 5,500 units devilish
[Nov 27, 2014 10:22:16 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - Nov 27, 2014 [ Issues thread ]

Lol, your math is, lets say, ballpark laughing
[Nov 27, 2014 10:35:01 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - Nov 27, 2014 [ Issues thread ]

ERR_EXEC -148

BOINC cannot create a new process. Or BOINC is already running. Only one instance of BOINC can run at any time.


Found 3 in the queue and pushed them ahead. Ran fine, adhered to the 1000 second checkpoint setting, a little less then optimal efficiency at 94-96 percent, but this could be an effect of running along with 5 ugm. Peak memory/vm usage modest at under 50mb. Did not look at any disk i/o to verify there's no 'write to disk at most' ignoring outside of the allowed checkpoints.

7.04 beta20 BETA_OET1_0000035_xMBGP_2011_0 00:25:25 (00:23:57) 11/28/2014 12:34:22 AM 94,23 Ready to report 43.96 MB 42.36 MB
7.04 beta20 BETA_OET1_0000035_xMBGP_4776_0 00:24:36 (00:23:17) 11/28/2014 12:34:22 AM 94,65 Ready to report 44.22 MB 42.61 MB
7.04 beta20 BETA_OET1_0000035_xMBGP_1356_0 00:25:56 (00:24:55) 11/28/2014 12:33:28 AM 96,08 Reported: OK * 47.21 MB 45.62 MB

The version number 7.04 implies this one did not need extended time in alpha.
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Nov 27, 2014 11:45:44 PM]
[Nov 27, 2014 10:40:24 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
KWSN-A Shrubbery
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Jan 8, 2006
Post Count: 476
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - Nov 27, 2014 [ Issues thread ]

Found four in my queue on one machine. Started them all up and two ran fine, two showed 12-15 seconds cpu time and 15 minutes elapsed.

Looks like there's still some work to be done on this one. Hope the results give you some good info.
----------------------------------------

[Nov 28, 2014 12:39:51 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 253   Pages: 26   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread