| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Beta Testing
Forum: Beta Test Support Forum
Thread: New BETA test - Oct 6, 2014 [ Issues Thread ] |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 148
|
|
| Author |
|
|
yoro42
Ace Cruncher United States Joined: Feb 19, 2011 Post Count: 8979 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Here are three more with error "Maximum disk usage exceeded". ==> Dumps are available if needed. BETA_ ugm1_ ugm1_ 00025_ 0178_ 2-- Thelonious Error 10/6/14 17:10:56 10/6/14 19:53:35 1.75 / 2.61 74.8 / 0.0 4000 query sequences compared. BETA_ ugm1_ ugm1_ 00025_ 0414_ 1-- Lester Error 10/6/14 14:46:18 10/6/14 17:47:02 2.95 / 2.98 69.6 / 0.0 10000 query sequences compared. BETA_ ugm1_ ugm1_ 00025_ 0418_ 1-- Lester Error 10/6/14 14:46:18 10/6/14 18:52:21 4.03 / 4.07 95.0 / 0.0 Result Log Result Name: BETA_ ugm1_ ugm1_ 00025_ 0418_ 1-- <core_client_version>7.2.47</core_client_version> < |
||
|
|
KWSN - A Shrubbery
Master Cruncher Joined: Jan 8, 2006 Post Count: 1585 Status: Offline |
Not much new to report. Three valid, four pending, no re-sends (yet).
---------------------------------------- Distributed computing volunteer since September 27, 2000 |
||
|
|
ccandido
Senior Cruncher Joined: Jun 22, 2011 Post Count: 182 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I didn't get any...
----------------------------------------  |
||
|
|
pramo
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Dec 14, 2005 Post Count: 715 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
my only issue- i didn't get a chance to restart/pause anything this time
----------------------------------------BETA_ ugm1_ ugm1_ 00025_ 0134_ 3-- - In Progress 10/6/14 19:51:18 10/8/14 05:27:17 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 BETA_ ugm1_ ugm1_ 00025_ 0134_ 2-- 721 Error 10/6/14 16:29:38 10/6/14 19:51:17 0.78 21.1 / 0.0 <--me BETA_ ugm1_ ugm1_ 00025_ 0134_ 1-- - In Progress 10/6/14 14:54:53 10/10/14 14:54:53 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 BETA_ ugm1_ ugm1_ 00025_ 0134_ 0-- 721 Error 10/6/14 14:54:50 10/6/14 16:29:35 0.56 17.0 / 0.0 Overall BETA_ ugm1_ ugm1_ 00025_ 0134_ 2-- MGW02846 Error 10/6/14 16:29:38 10/6/14 19:51:17 0.78 / 0.78 21.1 / 0.0 BETA_ ugm1_ ugm1_ 00025_ 0730_ 0-- HANMBX2 Pending Validation 10/6/14 14:55:58 10/6/14 22:56:28 6.60 / 6.64 151.0 / 0.0 BETA_ ugm1_ ugm1_ 00025_ 1110_ 0-- MGW00997 Pending Validation 10/6/14 14:53:26 10/6/14 22:13:28 2.49 / 2.51 57.9 / 0.0 BETA_ ugm1_ ugm1_ 00025_ 0304_ 1-- MGW02610 Pending Validation 10/6/14 14:52:25 10/6/14 22:40:35 4.73 / 4.75 116.5 / 0.0 BETA_ ugm1_ ugm1_ 00025_ 0814_ 1-- HANMBX2 In Progress 10/6/14 14:50:05 10/10/14 14:50:05 0.00 / 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 BETA_ ugm1_ ugm1_ 00025_ 0637_ 0-- MGW02693 Valid 10/6/14 14:49:46 10/6/14 18:56:06 2.48 / 2.61 61.0 / 48.1 BETA_ ugm1_ ugm1_ 00025_ 0625_ 0-- MGW02693 Valid 10/6/14 14:49:46 10/6/14 21:51:24 2.63 / 2.98 69.6 / 62.6 BETA_ ugm1_ ugm1_ 00025_ 0551_ 1-- MGW02693 Pending Validation 10/6/14 14:49:46 10/6/14 20:52:59 2.50 / 2.83 66.0 / 0.0 BETA_ ugm1_ ugm1_ 00025_ 0633_ 1-- MGW02693 Pending Validation 10/6/14 14:49:46 10/6/14 18:56:06 2.76 / 2.96 69.2 / 0.0 BETA_ ugm1_ ugm1_ 00024_ 0262_ 1-- HANMBX2 Pending Validation 10/6/14 14:43:57 10/6/14 22:56:27 5.83 / 5.87 133.5 / 0.0 and this weird Android that's been hanging around but irrelevant for this thread:) BETA_ FAHV_ x2BBB-AS_ 0879646_ 0260_ 3-- android_d8b3490 3 Valid 9/15/14 06:38:28 9/17/14 03:03:12 34.69 / 34.99 181.3 / 185.9  |
||
|
|
Warped@RSA
Senior Cruncher South Africa Joined: Jan 15, 2006 Post Count: 440 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
None for me either.
----------------------------------------I haven't snagged any beta's for about a year now. Oh well, maybe the gold badge was never meant to be.
Dave
|
||
|
|
Crystal Pellet
Veteran Cruncher Joined: May 21, 2008 Post Count: 1403 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
yoro42 wrote:
----------------------------------------Here are three more with error "Maximum disk usage exceeded". ==> Dumps are available if needed. BETA_ ugm1_ ugm1_ 00025_ 0178_ 2-- Thelonious Error 10/6/14 17:10:56 10/6/14 19:53:35 1.75 / 2.61 74.8 / 0.0 BETA_ ugm1_ ugm1_ 00025_ 0414_ 1-- Lester Error 10/6/14 14:46:18 10/6/14 17:47:02 2.95 / 2.98 69.6 / 0.0 BETA_ ugm1_ ugm1_ 00025_ 0418_ 1-- Lester Error 10/6/14 14:46:18 10/6/14 18:52:21 4.03 / 4.07 95.0 / 0.0 I got a resend of the bolded one. Your initial wingman had the same error. Edit: Returned the task successful. It's PVal, because the first resend was an error too, because it was created before Keith could make his adjustment. The upload file BETA_ugm1_ugm1_00025_0414_3_0 was 14139.45 Kb. That's far below the old limit of 100MB. Maybe the error was caused by the uncompressed interim file result.tmp that was between 130 and 140 MB. [Edit 4 times, last edit by Crystal Pellet at Oct 7, 2014 5:54:50 PM] |
||
|
|
[SG-FC] dingdong
Cruncher Joined: Nov 26, 2007 Post Count: 8 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
"Unable to open checkpoint file starting from 0", Runtime more than 11h
Result Log Result Name: BETA_ ugm1_ ugm1_ 00025_ 0778_ 1-- <core_client_version>7.2.33</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> Unable to open checkpoint file starting from 0 500 query sequences compared. 1000 query sequences compared. 1500 query sequences compared. 2000 query sequences compared. 2500 query sequences compared. 3000 query sequences compared. 3500 query sequences compared. 4000 query sequences compared. 4500 query sequences compared. 5000 query sequences compared. 5500 query sequences compared. 6000 query sequences compared. 6500 query sequences compared. 7000 query sequences compared. 7500 query sequences compared. 8000 query sequences compared. 8500 query sequences compared. 9000 query sequences compared. 9500 query sequences compared. 10000 query sequences compared. 10500 query sequences compared. 11000 query sequences compared. 11500 query sequences compared. 12000 query sequences compared. 12500 query sequences compared. 13000 query sequences compared. 13500 query sequences compared. 14000 query sequences compared. 14500 query sequences compared. 15000 query sequences compared. 15500 query sequences compared. 16000 query sequences compared. 16500 query sequences compared. 17000 query sequences compared. 17500 query sequences compared. 18000 query sequences compared. 18500 query sequences compared. 19000 query sequences compared. 19500 query sequences compared. 20000 query sequences compared. 20500 query sequences compared. 21000 query sequences compared. 21500 query sequences compared. 22000 query sequences compared. 22500 query sequences compared. 23000 query sequences compared. 23500 query sequences compared. 24000 query sequences compared. 24500 query sequences compared. Run complete, CPU time: 42381.187500 11:37:17 (536): called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]> |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
"Unable to open checkpoint file starting from 0" That seems to be normal behaviour for this project. It occurs at the start of processing every workunit, at which stage no checkpoint file exists. I assume it could occur at other times, too, like when a restart happens before the first checkpoint.I agree that the wording gives the impression of an error, though. |
||
|
|
NAP2614
Master Cruncher Joined: Mar 27, 2007 Post Count: 2546 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Result Log
----------------------------------------Result Name: BETA_ ugm1_ ugm1_ 00025_ 0850_ 1-- <core_client_version>7.2.47</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> Maximum elapsed time exceeded </message> <stderr_txt> Unable to open checkpoint file starting from 0 500 query sequences compared. 1000 query sequences compared. 1500 query sequences compared. 2000 query sequences compared. 2500 query sequences compared. 3000 query sequences compared. 3500 query sequences compared. 4000 query sequences compared. 4500 query sequences compared. 5000 query sequences compared. 5500 query sequences compared. 6000 query sequences compared. 6500 query sequences compared. 7000 query sequences compared. 7500 query sequences compared. 8000 query sequences compared. 8500 query sequences compared. 9000 query sequences compared. 9500 query sequences compared. 10000 query sequences compared. 10500 query sequences compared. 11000 query sequences compared. 11500 query sequences compared. 12000 query sequences compared. 12500 query sequences compared. 13000 query sequences compared. 13500 query sequences compared. 14000 query sequences compared. 14500 query sequences compared. 15000 query sequences compared. 15500 query sequences compared. 16000 query sequences compared. 16500 query sequences compared. 17000 query sequences compared. 17500 query sequences compared. 18000 query sequences compared. 18500 query sequences compared. 19000 query sequences compared. 19500 query sequences compared. 20000 query sequences compared. 20500 query sequences compared. 21000 query sequences compared. 21500 query sequences compared. 22000 query sequences compared. 22500 query sequences compared. </stderr_txt> ]]> Close Return to Top  |
||
|
|
ca05065
Senior Cruncher Joined: Dec 4, 2007 Post Count: 328 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I have only had one work unit which was to resolve Pver status. The two valid ones had zero 'checkpoint restored' messages whilst the invalid one had 43 'checkpoint restored' messages. Was this someone being very diligent testing checkpointing or a normal function of the calculations e.g. the program finds a dead end and retraces to a known point and starts calculating again? The other odd thing is that sometimes there are several 'checkpoint restored' messages which quote earlier and earlier checkpoints.
Here is the invalid error log: Result Log Result Name: BETA_ ugm1_ ugm1_ 00025_ 0527_ 1-- <core_client_version>6.10.58</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> Unable to open checkpoint file starting from 0 500 query sequences compared. Checkpoint restored: 544 Checkpoint restored: 929 1000 query sequences compared. Checkpoint restored: 836 Checkpoint restored: 930 Checkpoint restored: 836 1000 query sequences compared. Checkpoint restored: 1025 Checkpoint restored: 1452 1500 query sequences compared. 2000 query sequences compared. 2500 query sequences compared. 3000 query sequences compared. 3500 query sequences compared. 4000 query sequences compared. Checkpoint restored: 4194 Checkpoint restored: 4130 4500 query sequences compared. 5000 query sequences compared. Checkpoint restored: 5014 Checkpoint restored: 4898 Checkpoint restored: 4898 5000 query sequences compared. Checkpoint restored: 5012 Checkpoint restored: 4898 Checkpoint restored: 4898 Checkpoint restored: 4898 Checkpoint restored: 4898 Checkpoint restored: 4898 Checkpoint restored: 4898 Checkpoint restored: 4898 Checkpoint restored: 4898 5000 query sequences compared. Checkpoint restored: 5239 5500 query sequences compared. 6000 query sequences compared. 6500 query sequences compared. Checkpoint restored: 6714 7000 query sequences compared. Checkpoint restored: 7202 Checkpoint restored: 7432 Checkpoint restored: 7374 Checkpoint restored: 7374 Checkpoint restored: 7374 7500 query sequences compared. Checkpoint restored: 7481 7500 query sequences compared. Checkpoint restored: 7717 8000 query sequences compared. Checkpoint restored: 8144 Checkpoint restored: 8084 Checkpoint restored: 8261 Checkpoint restored: 8357 8500 query sequences compared. Checkpoint restored: 8467 8500 query sequences compared. Checkpoint restored: 8577 9000 query sequences compared. Checkpoint restored: 9022 9500 query sequences compared. 10000 query sequences compared. 10500 query sequences compared. 11000 query sequences compared. 11500 query sequences compared. 12000 query sequences compared. 12500 query sequences compared. 13000 query sequences compared. Checkpoint restored: 13119 Checkpoint restored: 13029 Checkpoint restored: 13117 Checkpoint restored: 13029 Checkpoint restored: 13371 13500 query sequences compared. Checkpoint restored: 13836 14000 query sequences compared. Checkpoint restored: 14171 14500 query sequences compared. 15000 query sequences compared. 15500 query sequences compared. 16000 query sequences compared. 16500 query sequences compared. 17000 query sequences compared. 17500 query sequences compared. 18000 query sequences compared. 18500 query sequences compared. 19000 query sequences compared. 19500 query sequences compared. 20000 query sequences compared. 20500 query sequences compared. 21000 query sequences compared. 21500 query sequences compared. 22000 query sequences compared. 22500 query sequences compared. 23000 query sequences compared. 23500 query sequences compared. 24000 query sequences compared. 24500 query sequences compared. Run complete, CPU time: 16007.717043 18:42:01 (11152): called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]> |
||
|
|
|