Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go ยป
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 43
Posts: 43   Pages: 5   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 5998 times and has 42 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New BETA test - Sept 23, 2014 [ Issues Thread ]

Two indicators, no heartbeat + 7.0.27 = linux
Right?

The day berkeley does something about the heartbeat kickout mechanism will one day arrive. One hurdle, if it ever does, all projects will have to rebuild their applications. The other is the fails from not finding the internet, mostly weak wifi. The two issues could be linked, wifi failing > localhost connection dropping > heartbeat problems.
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Sep 26, 2014 6:43:49 AM]
[Sep 26, 2014 5:54:34 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New BETA test - Sept 23, 2014 [ Issues Thread ]

Would not be surprised if the m in ugm would stand for mapping again.

Thanks for your explanation it does make sense. The M could also stand for Medicine. We will have to wait and see. If you want the answer you can dig around in previous New Beta test threads or the new project in the pipeline thread or words to that effect

Quite a few years ago saw a movie in which sean connery was swinging around on ropes amongst amazon trees in search of a cure, 'medicine man' it was called. wink
[Sep 26, 2014 8:02:27 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New BETA test - Sept 23, 2014 [ Issues Thread ]

Checkpoint restored: 4297
.
.
.
Checkpoint restored: 3201


Why would the checkpoint number go backwards? If it carried on from a checkpoint and then stopped again, it shouldn't go back further than that previous checkpoint. This looks wrong to me.
[Sep 26, 2014 9:04:58 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 43   Pages: 5   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread