Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 43
|
![]() |
Author |
|
Thyme Lawn
Cruncher Joined: Dec 9, 2008 Post Count: 46 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 on an i5-3230M @ 2.6GHz. 2 pending and 1 running at 30% after 1:45:00. Estimate is 5 hours for the pending task, but if the current rate of progress is maintained it looks like the running one will take around 6 hours. Completed with 5:54:18 CPU time and 6:06:22 elapsed time.Both of my PV tasks were successfully validated.
"The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world that it leaves to its children." - Dietrich Bonhoeffer
----------------------------------------[Edit 1 times, last edit by Thyme Lawn at Sep 24, 2014 5:06:05 PM] |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I just started the validator for this beta. Members should start seeing results validating. Thanks, Uplinger. All mine went Valid. |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
New Beta WUs seem to process OK. Got 9 of them on 3930K rig, 7 WUs have validated so far, 1 is pending and the other one in progress.
Good work guys... |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Aside from the errors already mentioned and explained, all mine have turned Valid except 3 in PVal. Looking good for the new project, I hope.
|
||
|
Crystal Pellet
Veteran Cruncher Joined: May 21, 2008 Post Count: 1324 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I got a resend for verification
----------------------------------------BETA_ ugm1_ ugm1_ 00014_ 0365_ 3-- - In Progress 9/24/14 19:58:13 9/28/14 19:58:13 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 <-- mine BETA_ ugm1_ ugm1_ 00014_ 0365_ 2-- 719 Pending Verification 9/24/14 05:34:58 9/24/14 19:58:10 5.51 128.9 / 0.0 <-- several restarts from checkpoints BETA_ ugm1_ ugm1_ 00014_ 0365_ 0-- 719 Pending Verification 9/23/14 22:21:42 9/24/14 07:01:46 2.55 70.8 / 0.0 <-- from start to end without restarts BETA_ ugm1_ ugm1_ 00014_ 0365_ 1-- 719 Error 9/23/14 22:21:40 9/24/14 05:34:57 4.32 110.1 / 0.0 <-- Maximum elapsed time exceeded after 8000 query sequences compared. I restarted mine after shutting down BOINC and restart after the first checkpoint. Edit: The wingman *_2-- went Invalid. Strange is the appently restore to checkpoints before the last one: Result Name: BETA_ ugm1_ ugm1_ 00014_ 0365_ 2-- <core_client_version>5.10.45</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> Unable to open checkpoint file starting from 0 Checkpoint restored: 55 Checkpoint restored: 280 Checkpoint restored: 336 500 query sequences compared. Checkpoint restored: 834 1000 query sequences compared. Checkpoint restored: 1162 Checkpoint restored: 1108 <-- this one Checkpoint restored: 1108 <-- this one Checkpoint restored: 1216 Checkpoint restored: 1275 Checkpoint restored: 1162 <-- this one 1500 query sequences compared. Checkpoint restored: 1493 1500 query sequences compared. Checkpoint restored: 1767 2000 query sequences compared. Checkpoint restored: 2212 Checkpoint restored: 2265 2500 query sequences compared. Checkpoint restored: 2705 Checkpoint restored: 2943 3000 query sequences compared. Checkpoint restored: 3211 Checkpoint restored: 3256 Checkpoint restored: 3361 Checkpoint restored: 3309 <-- this one 3500 query sequences compared. Checkpoint restored: 3527 4000 query sequences compared. 4500 query sequences compared. 5000 query sequences compared. 5500 query sequences compared. 6000 query sequences compared. 6500 query sequences compared. 7000 query sequences compared. 7500 query sequences compared. 8000 query sequences compared. 8500 query sequences compared. 9000 query sequences compared. 9500 query sequences compared. 10000 query sequences compared. 10500 query sequences compared. 11000 query sequences compared. 11500 query sequences compared. 12000 query sequences compared. 12500 query sequences compared. 13000 query sequences compared. 13500 query sequences compared. 14000 query sequences compared. 14500 query sequences compared. 15000 query sequences compared. 15500 query sequences compared. 16000 query sequences compared. 16500 query sequences compared. 17000 query sequences compared. 17500 query sequences compared. Run complete, CPU time: 19835.077125 22:23:11 (2308): called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> [Edit 1 times, last edit by Crystal Pellet at Sep 25, 2014 5:45:10 AM] |
||
|
anhhai
Veteran Cruncher Joined: Mar 22, 2005 Post Count: 839 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I checked those betas that I had that error out and I noticed that most of them have at least one other wingman that error out, however oter wingman were able to complete them successful. Not sure if this issue is wide spread. Does anyone else have this issue?
----------------------------------------![]() |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I have 3 14 tasks running very well. Did anyone else notice the large file download size on Windows? The task text files were between 4 and 7 meg I remember correctly. Will this be normal when the project hits prime time? It will be interesting to see what upload sizes will be like. Sure did. My largest downloaded file was beta19.ugm1_ugm1_00014_a_0002.txt (8.26MB, zipped down with a compression ratio of 43% to 4.68MB). The input files used for the 2 pending tasks on my i5 are that file plus one other (*_b_0047.txt is 7.48MB and *_b_0048.txt is 7.81MB with similar zip compression ratios of 41% and 43%). 7zip gives even better compression:
It's the bezerk cleanup mania of the latest clients once the last task completes of an app. Maybe though some counter measure was taken since, for not had cep2 for quite a while, but see the 2 big zips and the app in the wcg project folder. Seems someone was reading my mind before typing the comment above. Something in a future client, but it also needs change on the server side. David Anderson [Tue, 23 Sep 2014 19:39:09 +0000] client: add notion of sticky file lifetime If a <file_info> in scheduler RPC reply specifies <sticky_lifetime>, the client will calculate a "sticky_expire_time", store it in the client state file, and make the file unsticky when that time is reached. Note: if a later RPC reply includes the same file, the client will update sticky_expire_time. So if a file is used repeatedly it won't get expired. |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
anhhai, you don't give any details of the errors, but if they're the "max elapsed time exceeded" variety, then, yes, others are seeing the situation you mention and Keith has commented (implying the time-limit estimates will sort themselves out in production) - see earlier posts in this thread.
|
||
|
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: May 23, 2005 Post Count: 3952 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Anhhai, please read Tony's post, he explains it well there.
As for this beta test, things are going well, we are planning on adding more work units into the mix that will test the sizing functionality of the build script. That way we don't see work units that run for 15 minutes and others for 4 hours. Again, thank you for your participation in the BETA! -Uplinger |
||
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7699 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Managed to break one anyway.
----------------------------------------BETA_ ugm1_ ugm1_ 00015_ 0003_ 1-- Invalid 9/24/14 00:48:01 9/25/14 08:57:44 4.84 / 4.84 71.3 / 71.3 Result Log Result Name: BETA_ ugm1_ ugm1_ 00015_ 0003_ 1-- <core_client_version>7.0.27</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> Unable to open checkpoint file starting from 0 11:18:53 (7453): No heartbeat from client for 30 sec - exiting 11:18:53 (7453): timer handler: client dead, exiting Unable to open checkpoint file starting from 0 500 query sequences compared. 1000 query sequences compared. 1500 query sequences compared. 2000 query sequences compared. 2500 query sequences compared. 3000 query sequences compared. 3500 query sequences compared. 4000 query sequences compared. 12:30:16 (7492): No heartbeat from client for 30 sec - exiting 12:30:16 (7492): timer handler: client dead, exiting Checkpoint restored: 4297 4500 query sequences compared. 5000 query sequences compared. 12:45:00 (7630): No heartbeat from client for 30 sec - exiting 12:45:00 (7630): timer handler: client dead, exiting Checkpoint restored: 3201 12:49:29 (7675): No heartbeat from client for 30 sec - exiting 12:49:29 (7675): timer handler: client dead, exiting Checkpoint restored: 3201 3500 query sequences compared. . . . 17000 query sequences compared. 17500 query sequences compared. Run complete, CPU time: 17415.672135 16:33:34 (7695): called boinc_finish I have a few more in pending verification as this one was, so I suspect they may become invalid also. Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
|
![]() |