I have 5 cores running the android app with no errors. ( 1 le pan tablet,1 Asus transformer tablet and 1 HTC my touch phone) I am wondering if the tablets run the app better than phones? The tablets are used extensively, while the phone is not. Not done the research;is there any to verify the difference?

Considering you can take the same device to a half dozen other projects and have very little failure rate is a pretty good indicator the problem lies with the FAAH app itself. I have had several phones attached to many projects and the only two projects to have difficulties seems to be QCN and WCG/FAAH. QCN does depend on the device and compatibility. Here, I have had devices that ran solid until an app change. Then they had tons of errors. Two of my phones ran FAAH really well until the last app change. Now there are quite a few errors. If these devices used more power or cranked out more work, I would just remove them from WCG. However, since there is very little work being mangled by these devices. I leave them attached as a means of giving the scientists more device types to work with on fixing this issue. What I haven't done yet is test to see if I have any better luck running nativeBOINC rather than the official BOINC client for quite some time. Maybe it is time to fire that client back up.

I'm sure this is a stupid question and off topic but could someone point me to a link that describes the difference between native boinc and whatever I downloaded from google play. Thanks.