| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 3
|
|
| Author |
|
|
cowtipperbs
Advanced Cruncher Joined: Aug 24, 2009 Post Count: 78 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Hello all,
----------------------------------------I just built out two new boxes tonight and saw something kinda strange. Server configuration: OS: Microsoft Windows Server 2012: Datacenter x64 Edition, (06.02.9200.00) Processor: 8 AuthenticAMD AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 4171 HE [Family 16 Model 8 Stepping 1] Memory: 14.00 GB physical, 19.25 GB virtual BOINC client version 7.0.64 for windows_x86_64 Max additionl work buffer -- 4 days When box 1 download its work load the estimated work loads was close to the project estimated work load. Box 2 was twice as much. For example FAAH on box 1 is ~7 hours , box 2 ~14 hours. So as test I deleted the FAAH tasks and reloaded, now both boxes are in the same ball park; the ~7 hours. Both boxes were built the saw way, only about 30 min difference in down load of tasks. What gives? ![]() |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
"What Gives"... is that it's completely unimportant. Your 2nd device may have hit on a result that came from a different batch. Either way, the first time the device runs with defaults, and the benchmark at that could have been one on power-save and the other on full throttle, few possibles of many. After 10-20 completions, the averages will settle. Major -but-, there've been reports at Berkeley that the Time to Completions adjusts with huge lag in... 7.0.64 and same continuing into the 7.1 development versions so they are aware it could be wrong. [Seeing same here, for example a task after 5 hours at 90% and projecting still 2 hours for the remaining 10%].
Separate "Max additional work buffer" (MaxAB) at 4 days is rather useless if crunching only at WCG. Here you only get a limited number of units per work fetch [don't remember what the current standing CPU WU number is]. As soon as the cache is over the MinB level (Minimum work buffer), fetching stops, never topping the buffer out by itself. Don't like it... put the "What Gives" question over at Berkeley ;>) |
||
|
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7844 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
For example FAAH on box 1 is ~7 hours , box 2 ~14 hours. So as test I deleted the FAAH tasks and reloaded, now both boxes are in the same ball park; the ~7 hours. I would be interested to see what the average time to completion is after the boxes have been running for a while. If they are identical boxes, the times should approximately converge. Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
|
|