| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 7
|
|
| Author |
|
|
OldChap
Veteran Cruncher UK Joined: Jun 5, 2009 Post Count: 978 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Just a quick question really:
----------------------------------------Does anyone have any better method to overclock AMD GPU's than using AMDOverdriveCtrl which is limiting the frequency I can get to. ![]() |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Does anyone have any better method to overclock AMD GPU's than using AMDOverdriveCtrl which is limiting the frequency I can get to I take it that you're referring to using the Catalyst UI in Linux to access AMDoverdriveCtrl, but I'm not sure what you mean by 'limiting'. Anyways. the frequency-limits are still there in the command-line method (Ubuntu12.10 Linux, perhaps other Linux flavours too where 'fglrx' or 'fglrx-updates' driver are installed) as described below.Open a Linux terminal Type aticonfig Press the Enter key A help file displays next (within the terminal window) Hope this helps. ; ; andzgridPost#780 ; |
||
|
|
OldChap
Veteran Cruncher UK Joined: Jun 5, 2009 Post Count: 978 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Always helps to learn something new. Thanks andzgrid
----------------------------------------![]() |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Always helps to learn something new. Thanks andzgrid We'll do it again, any time, any place. ![]() Overclocking the GPU? Then think cooling.. think GPU fan-control FIRST ! Type: aticonfig --pplib "set fanspeed N xx" where: (type also the double quotes in the above line) N = device number xx = percentage fan speed to get list of device numbers (in case of multi-GPU setup), type: aticonfig --list-adapters to reset everything back to default/non-overclocked values, type: aticonfig --odrd ; ; andzgridPost#784 ; |
||
|
|
OldChap
Veteran Cruncher UK Joined: Jun 5, 2009 Post Count: 978 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
More good info for me the Linux noob.
----------------------------------------I had my rigs running Linux before the introduction of GPU, they seemed more efficient that way. Just testing now with my lesser cards to see how things perform before perhaps switching back my main crunchers. ![]() |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
More good info for me the Linux noob. Like a child in each of us, every one was once a noob. No body, but no body, is exempted. Besides, only the wise and learned acknowledges that he/she does not know much about most everything. Come to think of it, that's very much like... me, forever a noob ! ![]() I had my rigs running Linux before the introduction of GPU, they seemed more efficient that way. With not much overhead, Linux has reasons to be more efficient. It's the GUI that carries a lot of overhead. It's an exercise in compromise: the efficient is not as easy to use, and the convenience of ease-of-use makes for not much efficiency.P.S. I wonder why there is no function that does a 'read' of the fan speed, which seems a basic function to me. Maybe the Linux guys know that what is typed is remembered anyway, and therefore one only has to scroll to/from to review what was set. Talk about efficiency or no un-needed extras as much as possible, I take that as a testimony to the Linux efficiency. ; ; andzgridPost#785 ; |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I had my rigs running Linux before the introduction of GPU, they seemed more efficient that way. With not much overhead, Linux has reasons to be more efficient. It's the GUI that carries a lot of overhead.I find that hard to believe myself - I doubt the GUI causes much overhead. The operating system itself my be causing an additional overhead, depending on how various things are implemented, but not the GUI. For most people the GUI is doing ~nothing if they are away from the computer. Far more likely is that the compiler is producing better-optimised code (although anecdotal evidence tells me that Microsoft's compiler is usually faster than GCC), or that the underlying libraries in use are perhaps better implemented in Linux? I guess it's a holistic effect from a number of differences between Linux and Windows. [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Jan 4, 2013 9:22:41 AM] |
||
|
|
|