Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 59
Posts: 59   Pages: 6   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 7854 times and has 58 replies Next Thread
Crystal Pellet
Veteran Cruncher
Joined: May 21, 2008
Post Count: 1317
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: HCC1 Beta Test for Multiple Images in a work unit (Issues Thread)

step 2 is out the door. Let me know if you see anything strange.

Thanks,
-Uplinger

Nothing strange! Noticed the cpu usage and checkpoint halfway.
I suspended a task after the first checkpoint at 55% and I resumed it a bit later.
It restarted as expected at 50%.
----------------------------------------

----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Crystal Pellet at Nov 8, 2012 11:18:49 PM]
[Nov 8, 2012 11:16:11 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech
Joined: May 23, 2005
Post Count: 3952
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: HCC1 Beta Test for Multiple Images in a work unit (Issues Thread)

Ok, there is one more set of tests I need to run, and thus another 5 batches of multiple image files will be loaded up. So a lengthier beta than originally projected.

Thanks,
-Uplinger
[Nov 8, 2012 11:22:32 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech
Joined: May 23, 2005
Post Count: 3952
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: HCC1 Beta Test for Multiple Images in a work unit (Issues Thread)

Got 1 single image and then a burst of 7 of double image [the projected times are that]. Will we observe a 1 minute progress pause at about 49.9%, just as what we'd see at end but now at 99.9%, not 99.818? Of course, the packaging could also get combined at end and take double long. Picture the hovering hands over the panic button ;>)

Off to bed... the client auto-started them in high priority.


You should notice the pause at 49.9% (the end of the image) to have the pause and then again at the end of the second image.

Thanks,
-Uplinger
[Nov 8, 2012 11:26:51 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech
Joined: May 23, 2005
Post Count: 3952
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: HCC1 Beta Test for Multiple Images in a work unit (Issues Thread)

Is it definite that clients using an app_info.xml file will be filtered-out of the HCC-GPUv7.05 beta-test? If so, filtered-out due to non-identical file-references in the app_info.xml file for the new version of the HCC-GPU-WU, or filtered-out due to a client's use of an app_info.xml file regardless of identical file-references? thinking
;


no conspiracy here. filtered-out due to non-identical file-references in app_info would be my guess. We did not do any filtering on our end.

Thanks,
-Uplinger
[Nov 8, 2012 11:28:31 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: HCC1 Beta Test for Multiple Images in a work unit (Issues Thread)

no conspiracy here. filtered-out due to non-identical file-references in app_info would be my guess. We did not do any filtering on our end. Thanks, -Uplinger
Ok, I guess I used the wrong word. Sorry about that. My bad...

So, I just sent two done HCC-GPUv7.05-WU which completed twice my HD7770's norm at about 5minutes.
;
[Nov 8, 2012 11:44:51 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech
Joined: May 23, 2005
Post Count: 3952
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: HCC1 Beta Test for Multiple Images in a work unit (Issues Thread)

no conspiracy here. filtered-out due to non-identical file-references in app_info would be my guess. We did not do any filtering on our end. Thanks, -Uplinger
Ok, I guess I used the wrong word. Sorry about that. My bad...

So, I just sent two done HCC-GPUv7.05-WU which completed twice my HD7770's norm at about 5minutes.
;


LOL, no worries, I assumed you were poking a joke but wanted to make it clear there is nothing under the covers on our end happening.

Thanks,
-Uplinger
[Nov 8, 2012 11:48:58 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
BSD
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Apr 27, 2011
Post Count: 224
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: HCC1 Beta Test for Multiple Images in a work unit (Issues Thread)

You should notice the pause at 49.9% (the end of the image) to have the pause and then again at the end of the second image.

Thanks,
-Uplinger

You are spot on sir wink Keep'em coming hugs

BETA_ X0900075150301200610031552_ 1-- 705 Valid 11/8/12 23:30:07 11/8/12 23:49:38 0.05 59.2 / 57.5
[Nov 8, 2012 11:59:13 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
pfm3136
Cruncher
Joined: Apr 11, 2010
Post Count: 13
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: HCC1 Beta Test for Multiple Images in a work unit (Issues Thread)

Hmm, Err, couldn't they be parallel instead of serial?
----------------------------------------
[Nov 9, 2012 12:04:18 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Ingleside
Veteran Cruncher
Norway
Joined: Nov 19, 2005
Post Count: 974
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: HCC1 Beta Test for Multiple Images in a work unit (Issues Thread)

no conspiracy here. filtered-out due to non-identical file-references in app_info would be my guess. We did not do any filtering on our end.

It's supposed to be filtered-out and never assigned to users, but instead WCG will happily assign work for applications not specified in app_info.xml. On client, these will not be accepted, but no message is sent-back to server about this, so on next scheduler-request they're re-issued.

And this continues in an infinite loop until the tasks either times-out or wu is finished so the task isn't needed any longer.


08-Nov-2012 22:31:04 [World Community Grid] [sched_op] Starting scheduler request
08-Nov-2012 22:31:04 [World Community Grid] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work.
08-Nov-2012 22:31:04 [World Community Grid] Requesting new tasks for ATI
08-Nov-2012 22:31:04 [World Community Grid] [sched_op] CPU work request: 0.00 seconds; 0.00 devices
08-Nov-2012 22:31:04 [World Community Grid] [sched_op] ATI work request: 168844.17 seconds; 0.00 devices
08-Nov-2012 22:31:08 [World Community Grid] Scheduler request completed: got 2 new tasks
08-Nov-2012 22:31:08 [World Community Grid] [sched_op] Server version 701
08-Nov-2012 22:31:08 [World Community Grid] Resent lost task BETA_X0900072830368200607201032_0
08-Nov-2012 22:31:08 [World Community Grid] Resent lost task BETA_X0900072830289200607201033_1
08-Nov-2012 22:31:08 [World Community Grid] Project requested delay of 11 seconds
08-Nov-2012 22:31:08 [World Community Grid] App version returned from anonymous platform project; ignoring
08-Nov-2012 22:31:08 [World Community Grid] No app version found for app beta3 platform windows_intelx86 ver 705 class ati_hcc1; discarding BETA_X0900072830368200607201032_0
08-Nov-2012 22:31:08 [World Community Grid] No app version found for app beta3 platform windows_intelx86 ver 705 class ati_hcc1; discarding BETA_X0900072830289200607201033_1
08-Nov-2012 22:31:08 [World Community Grid] [sched_op] estimated total CPU task duration: 0 seconds
08-Nov-2012 22:31:08 [World Community Grid] [sched_op] estimated total ATI task duration: 0 seconds
08-Nov-2012 22:31:08 [World Community Grid] [sched_op] Deferring communication for 11 sec
08-Nov-2012 22:31:08 [World Community Grid] [sched_op] Reason: requested by project

08-Nov-2012 22:31:34 [World Community Grid] [sched_op] Starting scheduler request
08-Nov-2012 22:31:34 [World Community Grid] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work.
08-Nov-2012 22:31:34 [World Community Grid] Requesting new tasks for ATI
08-Nov-2012 22:31:34 [World Community Grid] [sched_op] CPU work request: 0.00 seconds; 0.00 devices
08-Nov-2012 22:31:34 [World Community Grid] [sched_op] ATI work request: 168863.11 seconds; 0.00 devices
08-Nov-2012 22:31:38 [World Community Grid] Scheduler request completed: got 2 new tasks
08-Nov-2012 22:31:38 [World Community Grid] [sched_op] Server version 701
08-Nov-2012 22:31:38 [World Community Grid] Resent lost task BETA_X0900072830368200607201032_0
08-Nov-2012 22:31:38 [World Community Grid] Resent lost task BETA_X0900072830289200607201033_1
08-Nov-2012 22:31:38 [World Community Grid] Project requested delay of 11 seconds
08-Nov-2012 22:31:38 [World Community Grid] App version returned from anonymous platform project; ignoring
08-Nov-2012 22:31:38 [World Community Grid] No app version found for app beta3 platform windows_intelx86 ver 705 class ati_hcc1; discarding BETA_X0900072830368200607201032_0
08-Nov-2012 22:31:38 [World Community Grid] No app version found for app beta3 platform windows_intelx86 ver 705 class ati_hcc1; discarding BETA_X0900072830289200607201033_1
08-Nov-2012 22:31:38 [World Community Grid] [sched_op] estimated total CPU task duration: 0 seconds
08-Nov-2012 22:31:38 [World Community Grid] [sched_op] estimated total ATI task duration: 0 seconds
08-Nov-2012 22:31:38 [World Community Grid] [sched_op] Deferring communication for 11 sec
08-Nov-2012 22:31:38 [World Community Grid] [sched_op] Reason: requested by project

08-Nov-2012 22:31:58 [World Community Grid] [sched_op] Starting scheduler request
08-Nov-2012 22:31:58 [World Community Grid] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work.
08-Nov-2012 22:31:58 [World Community Grid] Requesting new tasks for ATI
08-Nov-2012 22:31:58 [World Community Grid] [sched_op] CPU work request: 0.00 seconds; 0.00 devices
08-Nov-2012 22:31:58 [World Community Grid] [sched_op] ATI work request: 168879.91 seconds; 0.00 devices
08-Nov-2012 22:32:02 [World Community Grid] Scheduler request completed: got 2 new tasks
08-Nov-2012 22:32:02 [World Community Grid] [sched_op] Server version 701
08-Nov-2012 22:32:02 [World Community Grid] Resent lost task BETA_X0900072830368200607201032_0
08-Nov-2012 22:32:02 [World Community Grid] Resent lost task BETA_X0900072830289200607201033_1
08-Nov-2012 22:32:02 [World Community Grid] Project requested delay of 11 seconds
08-Nov-2012 22:32:02 [World Community Grid] App version returned from anonymous platform project; ignoring
08-Nov-2012 22:32:02 [World Community Grid] No app version found for app beta3 platform windows_intelx86 ver 705 class ati_hcc1; discarding BETA_X0900072830368200607201032_0
08-Nov-2012 22:32:02 [World Community Grid] No app version found for app beta3 platform windows_intelx86 ver 705 class ati_hcc1; discarding BETA_X0900072830289200607201033_1
08-Nov-2012 22:32:02 [World Community Grid] [sched_op] estimated total CPU task duration: 0 seconds
08-Nov-2012 22:32:02 [World Community Grid] [sched_op] estimated total ATI task duration: 0 seconds
08-Nov-2012 22:32:02 [World Community Grid] [sched_op] Deferring communication for 11 sec
08-Nov-2012 22:32:02 [World Community Grid] [sched_op] Reason: requested by project
----------------------------------------


"I make so many mistakes. But then just think of all the mistakes I don't make, although I might."
[Nov 9, 2012 12:12:04 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: HCC1 Beta Test for Multiple Images in a work unit (Issues Thread)

I have no problems with resends as I only have my device profiles set to accept work that I have defined in my app_info.


uplinger ... is it possible for WCG to run both versions (once the double ver is released) for a few days so we can straighten out our app_info files ... maybe if you could make the executables available for straight up download so we could fix things up on our ends quicker? If not, no big deal, just asking.
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Nov 9, 2012 12:23:00 AM]
[Nov 9, 2012 12:20:10 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 59   Pages: 6   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread