Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 48
Posts: 48   Pages: 5   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 4410 times and has 47 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta test for Computing for Sustainable Water (June 5, 2012) Issues Thread

Win 7 x64 --- 53 min. --- was taking 3 hr. 30 min.

XP x64 --- 1 hr. --- was taking 5 hr. shock

(on my much slower laptop ) Linux --- 1 hr. 18 min. -- was 4 hr. 45 min.
----------------------------------------
[Edit 3 times, last edit by Former Member at Jun 5, 2012 11:11:11 PM]
[Jun 5, 2012 6:06:22 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta test for Computing for Sustainable Water (June 5, 2012) Issues Thread

Got two.
They appear to be moving about 2.25% per CPU minute on an Athlon II X2 445 at 3.6GHZ. Not bad.

If only other projects had hidden optimization potential like this one...

[ot]My understanding was from some time ago that at least one other has serious chance of improvement. Then when the AutoDock based sciences get upgraded as per schedule and GFAM is also run through that second analysis, those will too do their fair speedup [though, if more resolution is calculated, we may not see that expressed in a time factor).[/ot]

--//--
[Jun 5, 2012 6:10:38 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
ccandido
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Jun 22, 2011
Post Count: 182
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta test for Computing for Sustainable Water (June 5, 2012) Issues Thread

did't got any this time.
I'm guessing they're all gone now...

Edit: sorry, did got one in one computer...
not complete yet
----------------------------------------


----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by ccandido at Jun 5, 2012 6:46:59 PM]
[Jun 5, 2012 6:15:08 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta test for Computing for Sustainable Water (June 5, 2012) Issues Thread

2 completed in 0.89 hrs and 1 in 0.81 hrs. Got some more.
[Jun 5, 2012 6:15:52 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta test for Computing for Sustainable Water (June 5, 2012) Issues Thread

One of the 2nd batch on the i5 has turned to Valid already - thank you, wingman _0!

BETA_ cfsw_ 0102_ 00102417_ 1-- 611 Valid 05/06/12 17:23:46 05/06/12 18:07:41 0.72 17.2 / 19.7
BETA_ cfsw_ 0102_ 00102417_ 0-- 611 Valid 05/06/12 17:23:22 05/06/12 18:09:15 0.75 22.1 / 19.7
[Jun 5, 2012 6:16:45 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Falconet
Master Cruncher
Portugal
Joined: Mar 9, 2009
Post Count: 3295
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta test for Computing for Sustainable Water (June 5, 2012) Issues Thread

Got two.
They appear to be moving about 2.25% per CPU minute on an Athlon II X2 445 at 3.6GHZ. Not bad.

If only other projects had hidden optimization potential like this one...

[ot]My understanding was from some time ago that at least one other has serious chance of improvement. Then when the AutoDock based sciences get upgraded as per schedule and GFAM is also run through that second analysis, those will too do their fair speedup [though, if more resolution is calculated, we may not see that expressed in a time factor).[/ot]

--//--


Thanks for the reply.

One WU finished in 38 minutes while the other finished in 39 minutes. This computer only ran one CFSW WU before but it took 5 hours and 6 minutes so a very significant improvement.


If this application is reliable, will WCG increase the amount of work per WU in order to minimize server load?
----------------------------------------


AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF 6C/12T 3.2 GHz - 85W
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 4C/8T 2.0 GHz - 28W
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U 8C/16T 3.0 GHz
[Jun 5, 2012 6:19:22 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta test for Computing for Sustainable Water (June 5, 2012) Issues Thread

sad
I'm guessing they're all gone now...
You might have only just missed them sad. My last batch downloaded at 18:08 GMT/UTC and included BETA_ cfsw_ 0104_ 00104885_ 0--.
[Jun 5, 2012 6:21:03 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech
Joined: May 23, 2005
Post Count: 3952
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta test for Computing for Sustainable Water (June 5, 2012) Issues Thread

It does appear that all copies are out right now.

And with the speed up we have already seen 1000 results back out of the 10,000 results sent.

Thanks,
-Uplinger
[Jun 5, 2012 6:25:56 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
sk..
Master Cruncher
http://s17.rimg.info/ccb5d62bd3e856cc0d1df9b0ee2f7f6a.gif
Joined: Mar 22, 2007
Post Count: 2324
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta test for Computing for Sustainable Water (June 5, 2012) Issues Thread

!
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by skgiven at Jul 18, 2012 8:57:35 PM]
[Jun 5, 2012 6:43:20 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
astroWX
Advanced Cruncher
USA
Joined: Sep 1, 2007
Post Count: 56
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta test for Computing for Sustainable Water (June 5, 2012) Issues Thread

My loner completed in 45m46s on Q9550 in W7_x64; it ran with a mix of CPDN and WCG/CEP. No issues.
(CPU time accrued second by second, while 'To completion' time fell away in chunks. Upload file 35.96KB.)
[Jun 5, 2012 6:45:35 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 48   Pages: 5   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread