| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Beta Testing
Forum: Beta Test Support Forum
Thread: Beta test for Computing for Sustainable Water (June 5, 2012) Issues Thread |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 48
|
|
| Author |
|
|
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: May 23, 2005 Post Count: 3952 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Please post issues or questions with the Beta associated with this post:
http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/forums/wcg/viewthread_thread,33255 Thanks, -Uplinger |
||
|
|
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: May 23, 2005 Post Count: 3952 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Application version will be 6.11.
Thanks, -Uplinger |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Fully loaded already, four on Win7, one on WinXP. It sounds like it needed some clever detailed work to reduce the runtimes that much: well done.
|
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
My clients decided to go HP on all bores. No acting up of the AV this time [a new mask was added, to have all WCG*_intelx86 get right of passage ;>]
----------------------------------------edit: And checkpoints wrote under observing the "save at most" rule of the host set 300 seconds. --//-- [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Jun 5, 2012 5:04:57 PM] |
||
|
|
Dataman
Ace Cruncher Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 4865 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
They are indeed running quicker. Had some start with a predicted 8 hours and it appears they will finish in
----------------------------------------  [Edit 1 times, last edit by Dataman at Jun 5, 2012 5:27:44 PM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Wow, the first four have all just completed simultaneously on my Win7 i5-750 in only 43 minutes, no errors, all in PV.
|
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Yep they are fast: on my fastest machine one is 45% completed at 25 min CPU time. Not a fancy CPU either, an I5-2540.
|
||
|
|
Falconet
Master Cruncher Portugal Joined: Mar 9, 2009 Post Count: 3294 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Got two.
----------------------------------------They appear to be moving about 2.25% per CPU minute on an Athlon II X2 445 at 3.6GHZ. Not bad. If only other projects had hidden optimization potential like this one... AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF 6C/12T 3.2 GHz - 85W AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 4C/8T 2.0 GHz - 28W AMD Ryzen 7 7730U 8C/16T 3.0 GHz [Edit 1 times, last edit by Falconet at Jun 5, 2012 5:44:52 PM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
First stats [using WCGDAWS history]
----------------------------------------W7-32 on Centrino-Duo: Before 6.50 (last 20), After: 1.33 (2) 389% faster, or about 1/5th the original time W7-64 on I7-Octo: Before 4.91 (last 90), After: 1.18 (13): 316% improvement, or differently stated, in 1/4th the time Linux-64 OO quad: Before 4.77 (last 260), After: 0.95 (8): 402% improvement, or differently phrased, in 1/5th the time of old. More received... and done the dirty shutdown stuff on Linux, after first checkpoint: No anomalies. --//-- P.S. I'm anticipating some priority scrambling... oh why did I race this thing to now near green... a throbbing big toe ;P Update edit: Quick shot from the hip, the HT CPU shows 'least' gain, but 1/4 the old times is... grandissimo! [Edit 2 times, last edit by Former Member at Jun 5, 2012 7:50:47 PM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
The beta on my slow WinXP/32bit Athlon64 3500+ completed in 73 minutes without error. I can't remember the previous runtimes, but it was a lot slower than that.
|
||
|
|
|