Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 5
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 1888 times and has 4 replies Next Thread
RicktheBrick
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Sep 23, 2005
Post Count: 206
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Average # of results going down, average days of cpu time going up for me

December 6th of last year I had 39 days of cpu time. I had close to half of the days with more than 30 days of cpu time. I had only an average of 112 results per day. In September of last year I had much fewer days of over 30 days of cpu time but I had an average of 158 results per day. So even though I donated about 15% more cpu time in December I had about 70% of the number of results. I have noticed that the number of results that take over 15 hours has increased dramatically for me. So that is why I figure my cpu time is going up and the results are going down. As a whole there has not been that great of a swing in the number of results so I can only figure that I have a good record over the last 5 years so they are sending me work that requires more cpu time than the average user. Doing a rough calculation I figure my average time per result went from 4.8 to 6.8 hours.
[Jan 21, 2012 4:28:20 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Average # of results going down, average days of cpu time going up for me

WCG extends or shrink WU sizes as the servers allow, based on performance. Usually the first to have this done are FAAH & HPF2. That's the only reason you see [average] duration changes on the same devices. In general [very simplistically], there's no special function that checks if any device can handle long or short, only if deadlines can be met [before the next scheduled reconnect, if that is controlled via the "connect ever xx days" setting.

Here's the mean run time for the past 3 months, per science, showing how run times vary. http://bit.ly/WCGART. Clearly you see major step change on HPF2/FAAH/C4CW, others go flat with a slow reduction as a result of ever more powerful devices joining the crunch, some move wildly based on the toughness of targets and proteins/ligands to process.

Summary, nothing to do with your devices, maybe/surely a substantial element of the science mix that your devices are processing [according your device profile selection]

--//--
[Jan 21, 2012 10:26:10 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
GeraldRube
Master Cruncher
United States
Joined: Nov 20, 2004
Post Count: 2153
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Average # of results going down, average days of cpu time going up for me

WCG extends or shrink WU sizes as the servers allow, based on performance. Usually the first to have this done are FAAH & HPF2. That's the only reason you see [average] duration changes on the same devices. In general [very simplistically], there's no special function that checks if any device can handle long or short, only if deadlines can be met [before the next scheduled reconnect, if that is controlled via the "connect ever xx days" setting.

Here's the mean run time for the past 3 months, per science, showing how run times vary. http://bit.ly/WCGART. Clearly you see major step change on HPF2/FAAH/C4CW, others go flat with a slow reduction as a result of ever more powerful devices joining the crunch, some move wildly based on the toughness of targets and proteins/ligands to process.

Summary, nothing to do with your devices, maybe/surely a substantial element of the science mix that your devices are processing [according your device profile selection]

--//--

That is correct and it also depends on the operating system
----------------------------------------

[Jan 21, 2012 12:22:43 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
RicktheBrick
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Sep 23, 2005
Post Count: 206
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Average # of results going down, average days of cpu time going up for me

I import stats into a spreadsheet in order to find out trends and other information. Since cpu time is in the format yy:dd:hh:ss and because that is not a variable that my spreadsheet will sum, I have to first import the data into a word processor. I do this so that I can replace all the : with spaces. I than import this data into the spreadsheet since I can than tell it use a space to determine the columns. I just wish there was an easier way since that takes up a lot of time if I want to import a lot of stats.
[Jan 21, 2012 2:33:09 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
wplachy
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Sep 4, 2007
Post Count: 423
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Average # of results going down, average days of cpu time going up for me

I import stats into a spreadsheet in order to find out trends and other information. Since cpu time is in the format yy:dd:hh:ss and because that is not a variable that my spreadsheet will sum, I have to first import the data into a word processor. I do this so that I can replace all the : with spaces. I than import this data into the spreadsheet since I can than tell it use a space to determine the columns. I just wish there was an easier way since that takes up a lot of time if I want to import a lot of stats.


This thread offers a number of solutions to the conversion problem.
----------------------------------------
Bill P

[Jan 21, 2012 3:38:13 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread