Etienne,
- choisis la vue avancée
- clique l'onglet Messages
- cherche les messages que tu veux nous montrer (et généralement ça nous aide beaucoup)
- sélectionne le premier en cliquant dessus une fois
- sélectionne les autres en maintenant Ctrl enfoncé et en cliquant une fois sur chacun d'eux
- quand tu as tout sélectionné clique sur le bouton "Copier les messages sélectionnés" en haut à gauche de la fenêtre
- dans le message que tu rédiges pour le forum place le curseur où tu veux inclure les messages puis presse Ctrl+V ou bien clique à droite et choisis "Coller".

Et voilà.
Ne te tracasse pas si les messages sont plus longs que la ligne affichée, il nous suffira de déplacer la vue pour pouvoir les lire correctement.

Autre méthode pour sélectionner un groupe de messages consécutifs plus rapidement
- sélectionne le premier du groupe
- maintiens la touche Majuscules et clique le dernier.
Une fois que tout le groupe est sélectionné tu peux éventuellement désélectionner un ou plusieurs messages en maintenant la touche Ctrl et en cliquant dessus.

Il va de soi qu'au niveau du message forum que tu prépares tu peux éventuellement ajouter les messages BOINC en plusieurs fois si c'est plus facile.

En ce qui concerne le deuxième groupe de fichiers de l'application (ceux en *.tga) ils seront envoyés avec la première tâche GFAM que tu recevras.

Sorry if my statement was in err, I have done this on another project where the video card did not meet the minimum requirements to run the project, but i put a hard overclock on it, and used this trick to get work anyway. I assumed that this is because the anon platform bypasses the min requirements, but this could just be on video card, I've never tried for anything else.

And just a note: It doesn't require the project to give out source code, you can simply lift the regular app that is downloaded when you attach to the project, and point the xml file at that app, which is what i did in the above mentioned case.

Hmm, guess this was a project-specific, customized limit that looked on the reported MHz or something of the GPU, so an overclock could be enough to meet this limit. The CEP2-bandwidth-limit is another speed-limit it's easy to violate, so even if you're on dial-up it's possible to get CEP2-work if so desires. Also, since a tasks FLOPS-estimates or computers benchmark can be wrong, a computer completely out of work in a project will still get 1 task, even if computer based on the estimates has no hope of finishing by the deadline.

Other limits like memory-limit and disk-limit on the other hand is always enforced by scheduling-server, since sending work to a computer not meeting either of these requirements nearly always gives problems, either due to running-out of disk-space in case of disk-limit, or computer-performance is severely impacted due to running-out of memory. Both of these things often leads to the task erroring-out due to not enough disk-space or can't allocate enough memory.


You can think of the various limits in this way:
The 1st. group with bandwidth-speed-limit and run-time-estimate can be seen as the minimum speed-limit on a motorway. Now, even if you're driving something that maxes-out at 30 km/h or something, as long as you're not caught by the police nothing will normally happen to you.

The memory-limit and disk-limit on the other hand can be seen as either "max height" or "max weight"-limits. If you comes to a bridge there it says "max weight 2000 kg" and you're driving a 15000 kg truck, it's a bad idea to drive over the bridge. Similarly, if a parking-house or a tunnel or something says "max height 2.1 m" and you're driving a 3 m high van, it's a really bad idea to try driving here.

It's the same with computer, if a task needs 1 GB memory but your computer only has 512 MB memory, trying to run this task is a bad idea.

Who was it that said just run HCC or a less resource demanding project on it? I had two machines that did exactly that (download and then did not run...so guess what they are running now: a wonderful project -- HCC. I guess I do not understand the need to spend precious resources trying to shoehorn 25 cents worth of candy in a 10 cent sack.