| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research
Forum: Drug Search for Leishmaniasis Forum
Thread: Looong running WUs |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 117
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Gil II
Senior Cruncher Canada Joined: Dec 6, 2006 Post Count: 368 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
BSD; my long running WU was still progressing but next time I looked it was gone. Funny thing, it does not show in my queue as PV or valid but it seems like it was counted.
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
BSD
Senior Cruncher Joined: Apr 27, 2011 Post Count: 224 Status: Offline |
This is the longest one of mine yet. It was crunched on an older slower AMD Athlon X2 Dual-Core TK-53 processor, TDP is a cool 31 Watts.
 DSFL_ 00000007_ 0000049_ 0532_ 1-- 619 Valid 9/7/11 00:41:30 9/11/11 01:38:55 20.09 204.7 / 211.3 <-- Mine DSFL_ 00000007_ 0000049_ 0532_ 0-- 619 Valid 9/7/11 00:40:34 9/9/11 11:40:19 9.66 217.9 / 211.3 |
||
|
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7545 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
DSFL_ 00000008_ 0000027_ 0166_ 0-- Pending Validation 9/8/11 04:23:33 9/10/11 09:30:37 34.26 245.7 / 0.0 This is my longest so far: q6600 stock Win Vista. Cheers
Sgt. Joe
----------------------------------------*Minnesota Crunchers* [Edit 1 times, last edit by Sgt.Joe at Sep 11, 2011 2:04:06 AM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Notably, the target 9 through batch 33 are processing with more modest run times. Me Q6600 caned quad does and did them so far under 7 hours with an occasional excursion to 8 hours. Very possibly there is a trend from early to later batches in the target getting longer, a 48 his heading for 20+ hours on the duo.
Project average dropped from Friday to Saturday by half an hours to 9.4... hoping this is a sign the lengths are starting to get under control, the average. Like 6 hours as a general objective. --//-- |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Notably, the target 9 through batch 33 are processing with more modest run times. Me Q6600 caned quad does and did them so far under 7 hours with an occasional excursion to 8 hours. Very possibly there is a trend from early to later batches in the target getting longer, a 48 his heading for 20+ hours on the duo. Project average dropped from Friday to Saturday by half an hours to 9.4... hoping this is a sign the lengths are starting to get under control, the average. Like 6 hours as a general objective. --//-- Well, in researching the processing on my machines, I came across this one WU which took 14.11 hours to complete. The details are below... DSFL_ 00000008_ 0000031_ 0848_ 0-- DAVETHOMPSON-PC Pending Validation 9/8/11 06:12:03 9/10/11 20:48:34 14.11 219.0 / 0.0 And the WU structure consists of 43 (or 44) jobs. The information for the last job follows... [12:30:53] Starting job 43,CPU time is 49787.734751. [12:30:53] ZINC14958365.pdbqt size = 29 6 ../../projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/dsfl.target_00000008.pdbqt size = 13522 0 [12:47:46] Finished Job #43 cpu time used 1010.652479 12:47:47 (5912): called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]> I say 43 or 44 because I can't look right now (stats being updated) so I don't know if the first job was 0 or 1. |
||
|
|
coolstream
Senior Cruncher SCOTLAND Joined: Nov 8, 2005 Post Count: 475 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I have seen a wingman clock 92.62 hours on a WU (DSFL_ 00000007_ 0000018_ 0602_ 0-- ). A third result was required for validation which resulted in his result becoming invalid.
----------------------------------------At least he was granted 1/2 of the final 'good' credit.  Crunching in memory of my Mum PEGGY, cousin ROPPA and Aunt AUDREY. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
He got the full time credited though :D
The project average runtime dropped from Saturday 9.45, via Sundays 8.79 to this morning's 8.56 hours per task. --//-- |
||
|
|
coolstream
Senior Cruncher SCOTLAND Joined: Nov 8, 2005 Post Count: 475 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Are runtime averages falling despite the recent (much longer) units?
----------------------------------------Crunching in memory of my Mum PEGGY, cousin ROPPA and Aunt AUDREY. |
||
|
|
astrolabe.
Senior Cruncher Joined: May 9, 2011 Post Count: 496 Status: Offline |
DSFL_ 00000008_ 0000045_ 0490_ 1-- 619 Pending Validation 08/09/11 16:26:32 11/09/11 22:15:34 45.59 275.9 / 0.0
|
||
|
|
KWSN - A Shrubbery
Master Cruncher Joined: Jan 8, 2006 Post Count: 1585 Status: Offline |
If I had to guess, I'd say the average is falling because people are deselecting the science and/or removing their slower systems from it. I haven't seen much change as of target 11, they're still running in excess of 7 hours when they used to finish around 6.
---------------------------------------- Distributed computing volunteer since September 27, 2000 |
||
|
|
|