Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 4
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 1438 times and has 3 replies Next Thread
JollyJimmy
Advanced Cruncher
USA
Joined: Aug 23, 2005
Post Count: 115
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
shock Strange "mass download" of DDDT2 tasks to my machine

Given the (historically) rather limited availability of DDDT2 tasks, a few days ago one of my machines experienced the equivalent of "rain seeker's paradise" - sort of: For whatever reason, and in spite of a 2.5 day cache, that machine, an eight core 64bit Wintel, managed to download literally HUNDREDs of DDDT2 tasks.
Took me a while to realize that, and also took me a while to overcome the resulting euphoria, only to realize that there is no way my machine will be able to finish even a small percentage of that work within the assigned time frame.
So obviously something went seriously wrong there and should probably be investigated.
Here are some additional details:
- I have a second machine, virtually identical (bit less RAM or so), that did not get to go to temporary paradise, even though on the exact same profile.
- I aborted somewhere about 450 tasks that would otherwise be due on 03/19-20.
- There is still a boat load of other tasks, due at a later time, that I plan to abort later this week (unless you tell me otherwise).

What's going on? confused
----------------------------------------
[Mar 16, 2011 4:05:25 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Strange "mass download" of DDDT2 tasks to my machine

You must have been running on empty and then connected right at the time when a wave of results expired... due the 19-20th means most probably at that quantity "No Reply" make up jobs.

As for the times, the DDDT2 C Type work as like 8 sub types, the 's' the short, taking about 1.5 hours here, so an eight core could well be completing them in 4 days. The 'p' range here from 5 to 6 hours.

Why so many? You know best, since you can look at the host DCF. Probably it was shot after maybe a series of short HCMD2. They vary wildly from 3 minutes to 10 hours, the range my quad has seen in the past week.

Enjoy your luck and crunch on.

--//--
[Mar 16, 2011 4:38:26 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
JollyJimmy
Advanced Cruncher
USA
Joined: Aug 23, 2005
Post Count: 115
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Strange "mass download" of DDDT2 tasks to my machine

Not really, Sekerob:
I have been running CEP2 and DDDT2 almost exclusively for months, with only a few betas and HCCs sprinkled in. Nothing else.
I believe at the time this thing happened, I had nothing but DDDT2 in the queue. The queue was likely full or at least well filled at the time (I have also recently reduced my cache size; did that before this happened, but not sure how close it actually was), and I have not observed any "ultra short" DDDT2.

Anyway, if you are not concerned, then I am not concerned, so I will be a happy cruncher dancing .
I just hope my reliability rating will not get dinged too much by this amount of user aborts - still hoping to get a Gold in Beta one day... praying
----------------------------------------
[Mar 16, 2011 6:47:32 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Strange "mass download" of DDDT2 tasks to my machine

450 task aborts are kind of like dinged for a good bit ;>)

(it will have been out anyhow with a 2.5 day cache since a ''reliable'' device must return results consistently in less than 2 days, except now you're way at bottom of ladder, so the device will have to return at least 77 valid results without interruption **. Peanuts for an 8 core ;P)

--//--

** 77 from a clean start, and lots more if totally messed up.

edit: Yes it seems it can run up to 122 valid results consecutively before a device is fully reliable again.
----------------------------------------
[Edit 2 times, last edit by Former Member at Mar 16, 2011 7:06:37 PM]
[Mar 16, 2011 6:56:04 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread