| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research
Forum: Help Fight Childhood Cancer Project Forum
Thread: Last Target? |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 94
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I'm still working on L3 units
|
||
|
|
Falconet
Master Cruncher Portugal Joined: Mar 9, 2009 Post Count: 3295 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Boas, duarte
----------------------------------------Aquelas L4 foram um teste.Ainda falta um bocado para começar essas. Bom crunching AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF 6C/12T 3.2 GHz - 85W AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 4C/8T 2.0 GHz - 28W AMD Ryzen 7 7730U 8C/16T 3.0 GHz |
||
|
|
Speedy51
Veteran Cruncher New Zealand Joined: Nov 4, 2005 Post Count: 1268 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Is there any difference in run time from L3 to L4 work units?
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Run times are variable throughout the target and seem to follow a pattern as we crunch jobs sequentially through the library of components tested for docking energy. During the previous target (N1) and present L3, my client logged run times for the duo varying from 4 to 21.5 hours. No reason to think it will be different for L4.
|
||
|
|
Bearcat
Master Cruncher USA Joined: Jan 6, 2007 Post Count: 2803 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Heck, most of my jobs have been 4 to 9 hrs. Saw one hitting around 20 hrs, aborted it, thinking it was stuck in a loop. I see I goofed. Ouch.
----------------------------------------
Crunching for humanity since 2007!
 |
||
|
|
TimAndHedy
Senior Cruncher Joined: Jan 27, 2009 Post Count: 267 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Could be a lead test batch. Yesterday I pulled a normal deadline 02463324 and the targets should go all the way to 0285xxxx, meaning some 400,000 dockings split in 2 are outstanding... that is if the one result pulled to discover progress was not out of order. --//-- As you figured, I built that batch out of order just to make sure there were no problems with the new batch. After this single L4 batch gets sent out, we will revert back to sending L3 batches (batches 250-287 for L3 still need to be sent). Batches for L4 will also run up through batch #287. Seippel Getting close. Hope the L4's went well. |
||
|
|
gb009761
Master Cruncher Scotland Joined: Apr 6, 2005 Post Count: 2977 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Well, we're now within 10 batches off from the end of the L3's - as I've just downloaded HFCC_L3_02768767_L3_0000_1. That is, assuming that they're still going in a logical order...
----------------------------------------Crunch on, and we'll have this project 'put to bed' in no time at all   |
||
|
|
Speedy51
Veteran Cruncher New Zealand Joined: Nov 4, 2005 Post Count: 1268 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Well, we're now within 10 batches off from the end of the L3's - as I've just downloaded HFCC_L3_02768767_L3_0000_1. That is, assuming that they're still going in a logical order... Crunch on, and we'll have this project 'put to bed' in no time at all When all L3 is done we will be 86.66% complete. As of 26/1/11 we are 82.84% complete. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Probably I made a mental math error or typod, but 2/3rd of 50% = 33.33%, i.e. at end of L3 we're at 83.33%
Mea Culpa |
||
|
|
Speedy51
Veteran Cruncher New Zealand Joined: Nov 4, 2005 Post Count: 1268 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
So you did. not to worry SekeRob we all make mistakes. Do we know how many tasks in total L4 is going to have?
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
|