| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 4
|
|
| Author |
|
|
duanebong
Advanced Cruncher Singapore Joined: Apr 25, 2009 Post Count: 134 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I'm building a new PC for WCG, and need advise choosing between the Sandybridge i5 2500K and i7 2600K. The wild card seems to be hyperthreading (4C/4T vs 4C/8T).
----------------------------------------I've searched for performance differences of having HT on/off. However, what I've found gives no clear picture whether HT makes a difference. Some claim huge improvements for WCG and folding: http://www.realredraider.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=28679 http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1501/19/ However, other sources claim more heat and performance decreases: http://ixbtlabs.com/articles3/cpu/ci7-turbo-ht-p1.html What have you experienced? Does HT make a difference for WCG? ![]() |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Hello duanebong,
Our experience indicates up to 25% greater throughput using HT. Of course, this was measured on the i7, which has the largest caches in Intel's i3/i5/i7 lineup. Performance is best using a variety of projects, which reduces contention for the same resources. Clean Energy Phase 2 has some potential I/O problems which could slow things down dramatically. Either avoid it or carefully limit it. If your memory or cache is limited, look over Sekerob's estimates of memory used per project and choose projects with a small footprint if you want maximum throughput. Lawrence |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
What have you experienced? Does HT make a difference for WCG? Yes, just don't expect 2x the performance/results/points by using 8 HT logical cores (i7) vs. 4 physical cores (i5). Of course, you will get 2x the "CPU Time" (good for badges). Take a look at this article about Sandy Bride Efficiency: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/sandy-bridge-efficienct-32-nm,2831.html Power consumption on both CPUs is very similar, but the i7 will do more work. |
||
|
|
duanebong
Advanced Cruncher Singapore Joined: Apr 25, 2009 Post Count: 134 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Thanks very much for the quick responses. A 25% improvement for WGC sounds great, and the badge hunting is a bonus.
----------------------------------------From some benchmarks floating on the web of other applications (nobody seems to publish WCG benchmarks, though occassionally I can find some for folding@home), I was fearing it would just generate more heat with zero or even negative performance gains. I suppose it's very application dependant. Does memory speed become a bottleneck when running 8 threads? On my Q6600 quad, scaling was poor when running the 3rd and 4th work units. Does it help to get DDR2000 or faster memory? ![]() |
||
|
|
|