| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research
Forum: Computing for Clean Water Forum
Thread: Target03 has started |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 20
|
|
| Author |
|
|
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: May 23, 2005 Post Count: 3952 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
short answer is no.
Longish answer is...creating more short work units does not provide extra value to the researchers. We are delaying the release of the new application as we are verifying a few things. The delay does not have anything to do with waiting on the validator for points. We are working towards releasing it as soon as possible as the increase in speed for the work is awesome. It will allow us to do more science in the same amount of runtime! -Uplinger |
||
|
|
astroWX
Advanced Cruncher USA Joined: Sep 1, 2007 Post Count: 56 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
All Target03 Tasks my boxes ran have, so far, been similar in length to previous work. (All in Windows [W7/Vista/XP] on C2D/Q [Q9550/Q9300/Q6600/T5550].)
----------------------------------------[Edit 1 times, last edit by astroWX at Dec 22, 2010 9:54:46 PM] |
||
|
|
joeperry39@gmail.com
Advanced Cruncher USA Joined: Nov 22, 2006 Post Count: 140 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
All Target03 Tasks my boxes ran have, so far, been similar in length to previous work. (All in Windows [W7/Vista/XP] on C2D/Q [Q9550/Q9300/Q6600/T5550].) My experience is the same on 2 Win-7 AMD Athlon Dual Core boxes. The difference in time on both machines appears to be statistically insignificant.    "Everything in moderation, including moderation" -- Mark Twain |
||
|
|
seippel
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: Apr 16, 2009 Post Count: 392 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
All Target03 Tasks my boxes ran have, so far, been similar in length to previous work. (All in Windows [W7/Vista/XP] on C2D/Q [Q9550/Q9300/Q6600/T5550].) My experience is the same on 2 Win-7 AMD Athlon Dual Core boxes. The difference in time on both machines appears to be statistically insignificant. After batch 300 you should start seeing the run time increase. Those batches have only been sent out very recently (within the past 24 hours or so) and all the results your machines have returned so far have been from batches before batch 300. The batch number is the first 5 digits in the 9 digit work unit number (B's in the example below): c4cw_target03_BBBBBxxxx_x Seippel |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Hi.
----------------------------------------I can tell you that the 03 i 'm running now are longer the 02's, that used to take my hex core around 2hrs, 40min to finish. One of the new one's running now has done 55% in 2hrs 37min. update/ The first one finished, near enough to 100% increase runtime. c4cw_ target03_ 003301709_ 0.__Black-AMD-X6__Valid__12/23/10__ 21:30:50__ 12/24/10__02:26:16__4.69__125.0 / 77.7 [Edit 2 times, last edit by Former Member at Dec 24, 2010 2:32:49 AM] |
||
|
|
bieberj
Senior Cruncher United States Joined: Dec 2, 2004 Post Count: 406 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
After batch 300 you should start seeing the run time increase. Those batches have only been sent out very recently (within the past 24 hours or so) and all the results your machines have returned so far have been from batches before batch 300. The batch number is the first 5 digits in the 9 digit work unit number (B's in the example below): c4cw_target03_BBBBBxxxx_x Seippel And why wasn't the estimated run time upped accordingly? Now estimated time for other projects are skewed again. :-( |
||
|
|
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: May 23, 2005 Post Count: 3952 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
The server will update these runtime estimates once multiple results come back from the new longer work units. This is done automatically. The systems is set up this way because our estimates manually were usually far off and caused greater discrepancy. Please be patient as the estimations will level out within a few days.
Thanks, -Uplinger |
||
|
|
Speedy51
Veteran Cruncher New Zealand Joined: Nov 4, 2005 Post Count: 1326 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Is there 10,000 batches for this target? If yes we are all most half way through this batch/target. I've just finished a task from 04482. c4cw_target03_044829937 Valid 2/11/11 23:08:06 2/12/11 03:29:48 4.12 105.9 / 79.0
---------------------------------------- [Edit 1 times, last edit by Speedy51 at Feb 12, 2011 3:36:56 AM] |
||
|
|
madmac
Advanced Cruncher England Joined: Dec 4, 2005 Post Count: 104 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Is there a new program for these as I have got 6.15 Clean water
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
gb009761
Master Cruncher Scotland Joined: Apr 6, 2005 Post Count: 3010 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Is there a new program for these as I have got 6.15 Clean water Hi madmac, well spotted - see this thread -> Updated Computing for Clean Water Version 6.15  |
||
|
|
|