Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 26
Posts: 26   Pages: 3   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 3415 times and has 25 replies Next Thread
Dataman
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Nov 16, 2004
Post Count: 4865
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Boinc 6.10.58

Well...it must be a Panda thing

Yep, it's a Panda thing. laughing

@Johnny Cool: Congrat's! biggrin


cowboy
----------------------------------------


[Aug 4, 2010 9:54:19 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
pirogue
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Dec 8, 2008
Post Count: 685
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Boinc 6.10.58

do you see better performance with that level?

I can't really say. I don't pay close enough attention.
----------------------------------------

[Aug 5, 2010 2:21:24 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
JmBoullier
Former Community Advisor
Normandy - France
Joined: Jan 26, 2007
Post Count: 3716
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Boinc 6.10.58

do you see better performance with that level?

I can't really say. I don't pay close enough attention.

If performance means work done there should not be any difference: it is not BOINC which does the work, it is the applications. BOINC is only managing WUs.

Now if you mean earned points or credits it's a different story since it seems that each version has its own CPU benchmark parameters. No idea why.
----------------------------------------
Team--> Decrypthon -->Statistics/Join -->Thread
[Aug 5, 2010 2:46:45 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Dataman
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Nov 16, 2004
Post Count: 4865
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Boinc 6.10.58


If performance means work done there should not be any difference: it is not BOINC which does the work, it is the applications. BOINC is only managing WUs.

Yes, this is true.
No idea why.


Because Dr Anderson says so. laughing biggrin laughing

cowboy
----------------------------------------


[Aug 5, 2010 3:01:17 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
anhhai
Veteran Cruncher
Joined: Mar 22, 2005
Post Count: 839
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Boinc 6.10.58

OK, thx, just wondering since there is a big difference between linux and windows. I hear linux WU are done almost 2x for some projects. Yeah, I know boinc doesn't do the work, but wasn't sure if the 64 bit OS has less overhead for this stuff, honestly I doubt it. The 64 bit improvement will only occur when WCG upgrade their WU
----------------------------------------

[Aug 5, 2010 3:08:21 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
JmBoullier
Former Community Advisor
Normandy - France
Joined: Jan 26, 2007
Post Count: 3716
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Boinc 6.10.58

In fact, OS and mode are where the differences are.
The WUs are the same.
The applications probably have minimal differences, say what is strictly needed to port them from one OS to the other.

Apparently Linux is more efficient than Windows at getting the best from available HW resources, and maybe its libraries are better (just a guess, I don't know).
And the 64-bit mode allows the OS (whichever) to use all bells and whistles available in modern 64-bit processors, while the 32-bit compatibility mode restricts them to 32-bit compatible functions.
The most impressive performance improvements are seen with HCC WUs, but all WCG projects are running faster in 64-bit mode. So much that one may wonder if there would still be much more to gain with 64-bit specific application modules.
----------------------------------------
Team--> Decrypthon -->Statistics/Join -->Thread
[Aug 5, 2010 4:37:07 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
knreed
Former World Community Grid Tech
Joined: Nov 8, 2004
Post Count: 4504
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Boinc 6.10.58

Back to the question in the original post. We are getting close to adopting the 6.10 version (in fact if you want to try it out our version is available at http://boinc.berkeley.edu/dl/wcg_boinc_6.10.57_windows_intelx86.exe

We are currently having an internal team conduct a security review on version. Once that is complete, then we will make it our recommended version.
[Aug 5, 2010 3:05:22 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
petehardy
Senior Cruncher
USA
Joined: May 4, 2007
Post Count: 318
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Boinc 6.10.58

Back to the question in the original post. We are getting close to adopting the 6.10 version (in fact if you want to try it out our version is available at http://boinc.berkeley.edu/dl/wcg_boinc_6.10.57_windows_intelx86.exe

We are currently having an internal team conduct a security review on version. Once that is complete, then we will make it our recommended version.


Will there be a 64 bit version?
----------------------------------------

"Patience is a virtue", I can't wait to learn it!
[Aug 5, 2010 5:24:15 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
GIBA
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Apr 25, 2005
Post Count: 5374
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Boinc 6.10.58

Back to the question in the original post. We are getting close to adopting the 6.10 version (in fact if you want to try it out our version is available at http://boinc.berkeley.edu/dl/wcg_boinc_6.10.57_windows_intelx86.exe

We are currently having an internal team conduct a security review on version. Once that is complete, then we will make it our recommended version.



Good post. I will wait to try this version reviewed by WCG tech team, when became available.

Thank you for this great update about this question. coffee
----------------------------------------
Cheers ! GIB@ peace coffee
Join BRASIL - BRAZIL@GRID team and be very happy !
http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/team/viewTeamInfo.do?teamId=DF99KT5DN1

[Aug 5, 2010 5:37:24 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Ingleside
Veteran Cruncher
Norway
Joined: Nov 19, 2005
Post Count: 974
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Boinc 6.10.58

Back to the question in the original post. We are getting close to adopting the 6.10 version (in fact if you want to try it out our version is available at http://boinc.berkeley.edu/dl/wcg_boinc_6.10.57_windows_intelx86.exe

We are currently having an internal team conduct a security review on version. Once that is complete, then we will make it our recommended version.

Hmm, the "normal" v6.10.57-version lead to multiple crashed clients during the alpha-testing, due to problems with GPU-detection. So, even WCG doesn't have a GPU-application, wouldn't the WCG-v6.10.57-version have the same problem?
----------------------------------------


"I make so many mistakes. But then just think of all the mistakes I don't make, although I might."
[Aug 5, 2010 8:17:18 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 26   Pages: 3   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread