| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Beta Testing
Forum: Beta Test Support Forum
Thread: BETA for type C's started. |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 63
|
|
| Author |
|
|
toss
Senior Cruncher New Zealand Joined: Jan 3, 2007 Post Count: 220 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
If you don't mind, please allow them to run for up to 1 hour if still at 0% then cancel them...It really depends on the speed of the machine running them...If the machine is older, please allow up to 2 hours if you can. Thanks, -Uplinger Approaching 2 hrs and still 0%. Going to dump them. |
||
|
|
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: May 23, 2005 Post Count: 3952 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
We have stopped the C.pr work units from being sent out. Since these work units failed within seconds of starting we have also cleared them out of the db so we can monitor the error rate on the other work units. The C.pr work units are a "work unit" error and we will be in discussions with the researchers as to what went wrong with them.
Thanks for all the help on the Beta! -Uplinger |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
BETA_ ts01_ a001_ pqa001_ 2-- xp-pro-i7 Error 12/05/10 22:35:17 12/05/10 23:18:57 0.56 12.2 / 0.0
BETA_ ts01_ a001_ pda003_ 4-- xp-pro-i7 Error 12/05/10 22:34:28 12/05/10 22:44:21 0.07 1.4 / 1.4 BETA_ ts01_ a001_ pdb003_ 3-- xp-pro-i7 Error 12/05/10 22:34:28 12/05/10 22:52:29 0.17 3.6 / 3.6 Windows XP pro on i7 running client 6.10.18 Error message:all similar to this https://secure.worldcommunitygrid.org/ms/devi...Log.do?resultId=359868336 |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Hi folks,
----------------------------------------My easy to remember Linux client 1234035 got a few C's as did the duo on Windows 7-32... all scored 100%, even some validated. cheers BETA_ ts01_ a003_ pca001_ 1-- 95711 Pending Validation 5/12/10 22:03:40 5/13/10 02:39:37 3.02 30.1 / 0.0 BETA_ ts01_ a005_ pda000_ 1-- 1234035 Valid 5/12/10 22:24:32 5/13/10 02:15:32 3.03 69.1 / 67.1 BETA_ ts01_ a004_ pqa000_ 2-- 1234035 Pending Validation 5/12/10 22:41:07 5/13/10 01:49:19 3.04 69.4 / 0.0 BETA_ ts01_ a004_ pqa002_ 0-- 1234035 Valid 5/12/10 22:41:07 5/13/10 01:48:37 3.04 69.5 / 49.6 BETA_ ts01_ a003_ pqb009_ 1-- 1234035 Pending Validation 5/12/10 22:40:48 5/13/10 01:46:15 2.99 68.3 / 0.0 BETA_ ts01_ a003_ pca002_ 1-- 95711 Pending Validation 5/12/10 22:03:40 5/13/10 01:18:09 3.05 30.4 / 0.0
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
Rickjb
Veteran Cruncher Australia Joined: Sep 17, 2006 Post Count: 666 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
gb009761: The two WU's I picked up, seem to have restarted okay from a checkpoint (I stopped/restarted BOINC), and have reached 40% after 70 mins...
I just returned BETA_ts05_a004_pdb001_0, OK. I suspended it & resumed it from checkpoint successfully at about 97% complete. Hint for anybody who performs a resume-from-checkpoint test: There is no need to suspend BOINC or WUs running on other CPU cores. That would cause all WUs to lose the crunching time since they last checkpointed. If you CLEAR "Leave applications in memory while suspended" in your BOINC Advanced view >> Advanced Menu >> Preferences > disk and memory usage tab, a restart from checkpoint will be forced if you suspend a WU, wait, say 30 seconds, and then resume it. It is probably a good idea to monitor the task disappearing from the system task list before restarting it. In Windows, you can monitor this with Task Manager, sorted on the Name field. In Linux (+ Mac Unix?), ps will do if there isn't something fancier by now. If you normally run with "Leave apps in mem" enabled, clear it temporarily and re-enable it after the resume-from-checkpoint test. - HTH |
||
|
|
nasher
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Dec 2, 2005 Post Count: 1422 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
again for the i think 5th or more beta sends in a row i have missed receiving any beta's on any of my 3 machines.
----------------------------------------yes i have the beta box checked and yes i have done beta's in the past. dose anyone have a checklist of other things i should make sure to find out reasons i might not be getting beta's when they come out or am i just being unlucky on receiving beta's?  |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I lucked out this run, no errors yet:
BETA_ ts02_ a005_ sr34a1_ 1-- Valid 5/13/10 04:12:10 5/13/10 11:59:20 0.93 9.0 / 10.0 BETA_ ts02_ a004_ pla001_ 0-- Valid 5/13/10 02:29:54 5/13/10 14:29:57 2.91 29.6 / 27.7 BETA_ ts02_ a006_ pdb002_ 0-- Valid 5/13/10 02:12:01 5/13/10 04:43:42 1.76 39.5 / 36.4 BETA_ ts02_ a006_ pda003_ 2-- Valid 5/13/10 02:11:41 5/13/10 04:43:01 1.76 39.3 / 36.0 BETA_ ts02_ a005_ pdb004_ 0-- Valid 5/13/10 02:11:02 5/13/10 04:43:22 1.76 39.3 / 46.1 BETA_ ts02_ a005_ pcb011_ 0-- Pending 5/13/10 01:50:32 5/13/10 06:23:04 4.11 34.9 / 0.0 BETA_ ts02_ a005_ pca000_ 1-- Valid 5/13/10 01:47:25 5/13/10 04:04:39 1.68 37.7 / 40.3 BETA_ ts02_ a004_ pcb002_ 0-- Valid 5/13/10 01:44:46 5/13/10 04:48:49 2.27 36.4 / 41.9 BETA_ ts02_ a004_ pcb000_ 0-- Valid 5/13/10 01:43:40 5/13/10 04:48:29 2.26 36.4 / 40.6 BETA_ ts02_ a001_ pca013_ 2-- Valid 5/13/10 01:14:05 5/13/10 05:30:47 2.30 22.2 / 38.7 BETA_ ts01_ a004_ sr67b1_ 2-- Valid 5/13/10 00:49:26 5/13/10 02:50:51 0.91 14.6 / 15.5 BETA_ ts01_ a006_ pqb010_ 0-- Valid 5/12/10 22:47:48 5/13/10 04:12:10 3.59 34.4 / 30.7 |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
all mine have been returned and all valid win7 64 bit quad 9550
|
||
|
|
Dataman
Ace Cruncher Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 4865 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I am pleased to see that some people received some. My trotline did not snag any. I must sharpen the hooks or change bait.
----------------------------------------   |
||
|
|
martin64
Senior Cruncher Germany Joined: May 11, 2009 Post Count: 445 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
dose anyone have a checklist of other things i should make sure to find out reasons i might not be getting beta's when they come out or am i just being unlucky on receiving beta's? You could double check that you have set a short enough return time? I've received 2 even with my E6300, it brought my BETA achievement significantly forward - to 21 hours total now.  Regards, Martin  |
||
|
|
|