| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 95
|
|
| Author |
|
|
gb009761
Master Cruncher Scotland Joined: Apr 6, 2005 Post Count: 3010 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Hm, As I understand it, then this "fix" is implemented for DDDT2 for now. I might be wrong though, but it explains how I got some A and B work units before. If it is implemented on DDDT2, then I certainly haven't seen any announcement, nor how do you explain that I managed to get so many C types in the last 2 brief showers? (I only have the 1 dual core computer at my disposal)... ![]() |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
don't believe this has been done yet.. if ever will be for this project..
|
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
gb009761,
----------------------------------------Not really... if the device qualifies it's just a question of the client having asked for work when it was in the pipe with enough seconds. The work goes out rather slow with 18mb a pop, so a client wont ask for work again until it knows what it has received / is receiving [at least that's what I observed]. I got a total of 6 on the HFCC/HCC/DDDT2 mix when sitting near a free-hotspot last week (of a McD) to report work completed off-line. Hotel room power is in the daily rate ;>) edit: address as there came a poster in between whilst typing. And NO, nothing was implemented to limit the amount of work per device queue, the work call is maxed at 15 per call. Personally I'd not be adverse to limiting the A-Type to 1 per core. Technically not sure it can be done for the B-Type given they're in the same feed as the C-Type... and of those there's still 22 million to come... we let the techs and scientists plod on the iron out the odd bugs, without pressurizing the vessel further to what they're already exposed to ![]()
WCG
----------------------------------------Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! [Edit 1 times, last edit by Sekerob at Apr 13, 2010 2:52:04 PM] |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
BTW, whilst my initial extrapolation was 6,500 years for the project and with present 184,000 over 79 years, think we're looking at > 9,000 CPU years so ample time to collect what's there to collect over the phase duration. By comparison, FLU1 had 2,877 years at the close.
----------------------------------------
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
Jack007
Master Cruncher CANADA Joined: Feb 25, 2005 Post Count: 1604 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Nah Jack, I wasn't referring to you. Your post truly amused me ![]() Oh I know Tuesday, still waiting on monday's rain... am 8 days from gold, but my loss on DDDT2 is a gain for HFCC which is making a push for sapphire. BRING THE RAIN ![]() |
||
|
|
|