Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Support Forum: Suggestions / Feedback Thread: Reward/recognition on a science-milestone behind the crunching. |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 3
|
Author |
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Hello WCG.
Attention: all Gentlemen: One idea (if not THE idea) of the use of milestones in projects is to quantify progress or achievement of a certain aspect of a project. In molecular-based WCG projects, like HPF2, one milestone is the achievement of lowest-energy binding (LEB) of molecules. I propose that every WCG project have a milestone entered into WCG's system of reward/recognition. The "badge" system can be viewed as one "module" in such a reward/recognition system. Under the "badge" module, WCG crunchers are rewarded/recognized for their contribution on the computing-aspect of crunching WUs -- specifically runtime, and related milestones. In my proposal, the crunchers would be rewarded/recognized for their contribution on (advancing) the science-aspect behind the crunched WUs; in the case of molecular-based projects -- specifically, LEB. I leave it to the WCG-management to flesh out the implementation mechanics/specifics. One approach would be the "hitter of the day" or something like that, for the cruncher who found the LEB to date and would hold on to that title unless toppled by yet lower LEB from another cruncher. Another approach, and I hope this would play out as a close counterpart to the "badges" module, would be ranking crunchers according to the number of times he/she made a "hit" on the LEB. Because a cruncher would never know in advance if crunching a given WU would hit an LEB, the LEB milestone also serves as somewhat of an equalizer merit for those crunchers who may not afford muscle computers to give them big runtimes under the badge module. The small guy may hit the most LEBs while using the lower end class of computers -- a chance for a recognition that would be zero under the badge-only system. Given that the science behind the WU is the raison-de-etre of why we do crunching to begin with, it is time to put our money where the money truly belongs: in the science side of crunching. It is time to reward/recognize crunchers for achieving a science milestone side-by-side with the existing badge system. Comments, anyone? Good day ; |
||
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
It's a nice feature as seen on some, not all standard BOINC project front pages such as Predictor of the Day and inquired into a view times at WCG, but how realizable it is to implement and maintain is hard to say from my vantage point. With WCG being the host and scientists all over the planet not sure WCG has the skill to real time scan the 460,000 daily results, seeds, dockings, BE whatever to know what they're looking at.
----------------------------------------If at all, it should be all projects, not only projects that are suited to do this and think it could only be done on the life part of the system. Once the results are moved to the master database and transfered to the scientists, they're gone (not quite as WCG also keep a full archive copy of all work completed in case the scientist site gets hit by a hurricane). From there on coupling back a result to a volunteer will require effort. Thanks for the suggestion.
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Hello WCG. I suggest that your words be inclusive of both men and womenAttention: all Gentlemen |
||
|
|