Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 62
Posts: 62   Pages: 7   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 7858 times and has 61 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: How many would be OK with a "Let it Rip" option on HCMD2?

astrolab ... the point is to try to eliminate (or at least reduce) the amount of redundant processng caused by WUs that need to be prematurely stopped at the current markers (6 and 12 hours).

You should not be losing anything if the PC is turned off unless you have told BOINC to never write to disk which I think is likely a rare exception in the crunching community.

I also very rarely lose a WU when the power goes out. Most of the time it just starts processing again when the power comes back on.

As for crashes ... I think this is another very uncommon occurence for the HCMD2 project. If you are having problems with your P4 erroring out WUs perhaps that machine needs to get a little attention :-)

Steve
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Feb 24, 2010 12:05:40 PM]
[Feb 24, 2010 11:59:33 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: How many would be OK with a "Let it Rip" option on HCMD2?

I would have no problem with crunching a WU for days on end, as long as it was able to load and run on my computer. I'd just hate to see scientists lose a large portion of the grid users by creating pieces that are too large for their memory/pagesize.

If that's not an issue - go for it! :)

Faldor
[Mar 5, 2010 5:49:22 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: How many would be OK with a "Let it Rip" OPTION on HCMD2?

The title proposes this as "option", so suppose it's for those selecting these long ones in their device profiles.

Saying Aye and going for the max!
[Mar 5, 2010 7:32:20 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Mysteron347
Senior Cruncher
Australia
Joined: Apr 28, 2007
Post Count: 179
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: How many would be OK with a "Let it Rip" OPTION on HCMD2?

Ah - the proposition is a Cure for SOME - those with the fastest machines able to operate 24/7.

What I have proposed, despite some snide commentary, is in fact a Cure for ALL.
[Mar 6, 2010 8:31:23 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: How many would be OK with a "Let it Rip" OPTION on HCMD2?

My machines crunch 24/7 and I have 100mb connection to the net.

I don't care how big the data sets are or how long they take, send 'em my way!
[Mar 9, 2010 6:32:28 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: How many would be OK with a "Let it Rip" OPTION on HCMD2?

I'm in favour of the idea of being able to chose to compute whole wu, whatever the time it takes.
[Mar 9, 2010 10:42:32 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
I need a bath
Senior Cruncher
USA
Joined: Apr 12, 2007
Post Count: 347
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: How many would be OK with a "Let it Rip" OPTION on HCMD2?

Let her rip is A-Ok with me!
----------------------------------------

[Mar 10, 2010 1:36:06 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Decrypt74
Cruncher
France
Joined: May 20, 2009
Post Count: 36
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: How many would be OK with a "Let it Rip" option on HCMD2?

Let it Rip!

+1
----------------------------------------

[Mar 10, 2010 7:40:34 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Justinien
Cruncher
Joined: Dec 5, 2009
Post Count: 3
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: How many would be OK with a "Let it Rip" option on HCMD2?

I'm OK too
[Mar 12, 2010 5:22:40 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Hypernova
Master Cruncher
Audaces Fortuna Juvat ! Vaud - Switzerland
Joined: Dec 16, 2008
Post Count: 1908
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: How many would be OK with a "Let it Rip" option on HCMD2?

AYE as long as the option is device specific. I can then devote some machines to these unlimited WU's and others to standard work.

Movieman said:

A shame WCG isn't a multi-threaded app..


I do not really understand that. We have one WU per core running in parallel. In quad HT we have 8 threads active.
Or is it about the BOINC client which is not multithreaded maybe but again what is the use ? Can someone shed me some of his light on this?
----------------------------------------

[Mar 14, 2010 2:38:17 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 62   Pages: 7   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread