Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 8
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 2543 times and has 7 replies Next Thread
TKH
Former World Community Grid Admin
USA
Joined: Aug 13, 2005
Post Count: 775
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
FA@H Status Update January 19, 2010

Hello Dear Members,

The scientists have updated the project status update on their website. Enjoy.

TKH
[Jan 21, 2010 1:08:03 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Falconet
Master Cruncher
Portugal
Joined: Mar 9, 2009
Post Count: 3315
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: FA@H Status Update January 19, 2010

I had a WU from batch 10340

If my math is good we should be almost half of experiment 31
----------------------------------------


- AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF 6C/12T 3.2 GHz - 85W
- AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 4C/8T 2.0 GHz - 28W
- AMD Ryzen 7 7730U 8C/16T 3.0 GHz
[Jan 23, 2010 10:06:45 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
logaritse
Advanced Cruncher
Indonesia
Joined: Apr 23, 2008
Post Count: 104
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: FA@H Status Update January 19, 2010

glad to hear that :) i hope we made a good progress to find the cure.
----------------------------------------
Simplicity meet classic
[Jan 27, 2010 3:12:58 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: FA@H Status Update January 19, 2010

Yesterday the breaking news rolled up in scientific community:
"researchers had grown a crystal that enabled them to see the structure of an enzyme called integrase"

FAAH is going to test docking with the model of integrase:
"Grant number 3P01GM083658-0251 will enable us to perform virtual High-Throughput Screens against our
brand new models of the catalytic core domain of HIV integrase"

So I just wonder if are you going to update the model before running tests and then if we have to rerun some tests if old model was already used?
Keep up excelent work!
[Feb 2, 2010 10:47:28 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
mgl_ALPerryman
FightAIDS@Home, GO Fight Against Malaria and OpenZika Scientist
USA
Joined: Aug 25, 2007
Post Count: 283
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: FA@H Status Update January 19, 2010

Dear Wojciech Czyz,

I was excited by that press release, as well. I am going to study that research paper soon, and I'll let you know how that new data will affect our future modeling goals. At this point, I cannot yet get a copy of the coordinates of that new crystal structure from the PDB (Protein DataBank). As soon as the 3-D atomic details of the new crystal structure are available to the public, I will be able to make a much better assessment of the relevancy of their new structure to our specific goals at FAAH.

My current concern is that their new crystal structure of integrase is from PFV (prototype foamy virus)--it's not from HIV. The PFV integrase enzyme has a very different amino acid sequence than HIV integrase. The atomic details of the PFV integrase might provide useful insight about HIV integrase that will help us refine our models, but I won't know that for sure until I've been able to study the paper and the 3-D coordinates of the crystal structure. The new PFV integrase crystal structure should provide great information about integrase enzymes in general, but I don't yet know if the details are similar enough to help us increase the accuracy of our models of the wild type HIV integrase and of two of its most raltegravir-resistant mutants.

We have not yet performed any FAAH experiments against HIV integrase. After 1 to 3 more experiments against HIV protease, we plan to submit experiments focused on HIV integrase.

Best wishes,
Dr. Alex Perryman


PS--thank you for translating some of our FAAH pages into Spanish. Kudos for helping!
[Feb 3, 2010 6:07:09 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: FA@H Status Update January 19, 2010

Dear Alex,
Always a pleasure to assist in your efforts. I just have received the preliminary PDB file of the discovered protease, what is your email to send it to you?

Keep up great work
Wojciech
[Feb 4, 2010 11:42:31 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: FA@H Status Update January 19, 2010

It is exciting to hear that WCG/FAAH can help in the study of HIV integrase.

It would seem that the methods of exploiting HIV protease have been relatively well studied.

Whereas, I think, bio-tec have only begun to scratch the surface in the areas of HIV integrase inhibitors and fusion inhibitors.


Let's keep crunching!
[Mar 25, 2010 6:05:03 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
mgl_ALPerryman
FightAIDS@Home, GO Fight Against Malaria and OpenZika Scientist
USA
Joined: Aug 25, 2007
Post Count: 283
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
smile Re: FA@H Status Update January 19, 2010

To follow up on our previous discussion regarding the new Prototype Foamy Virus integrase crystal structures published in Nature: we do not need to update our models of HIV integrase before targeting them on FightAIDS@Home, but our new modeling protocols could help further refine the new PFV integrase crystal structures. Our new models were published recently; the paper can be found at:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20096702

A member of World Community Grid (wojciech_czyz) obtained early access to their pdb files of PFV integrase, and he sent me a copy. After studying those pdb files for a couple hours, I think that their new crystal structures of PFV integrase could be useful when searching for new scaffolds to bis chelate the two Mg ions in the active site (that is, after minimizing their new crystal structures with our new NMR-type restraint protocol applied to the magnesium--oxygen interactions). Finding these new scaffolds should help advance the development of inhibitors against the G140S/Q148H drug-resistant mutant. I most likely won't use their crystal structures for lead optimization purposes (i.e., for trying to improve a weakly binding hit into a much more potent, drug-like compound), but their new crystal structures could be helpful when using fragments to search for new hits against that drug-resistant mutant.

To advance the development of HIV integrase inhibitors, I advise using proper models of HIV integrase, followed by experimental assays against HIV integrase. PFV integrase has a different secondary structure and different residues composing an active site with a different overall shape. Some aspects of the PFV integrase crystal structures are relevant to the HIV integrase system (as discussed below), but the precise atomic details of the entire active sites are definitely not identical.

In that Nature paper on PFV integrase, they make an interesting statement on p. 3:
"Although the crystals could be grown in the presence of MgCl2, which considerably improved their diffraction limit, data resolution did not allow unambiguous visualization of Mg2+ cations in the active site."
-As a result, they still have some improper bidentate coordination geometries in their crystal structures (some of which contain Zn in the active site, instead of Mg..............Zn has very different preferences regarding coordination geometries). The precise locations and interactions displayed by the two catalytic magnesium ions are a critical issue.

On a positive note: "This result confirmed the expected two-metal binding mode of retroviral INs." Their data on bis chelation of the 2 active site metals agrees well with our AutoDock-based predictions.

Since the DNA-bound PFV integrase crystal structures have a closed conformation of the active site loop, this suggests that the closed conformations of the 140s loop in HIV integrase are likely the active ones. When searching for allosteric inhibitors against the E92Q/N155H mutant (see Experiment 33 on the Status page), I'll target the snapshots that have the most open conformations of the 140s loop, to try to develop "first-in-class" 3' processing inhibitors. A collaborator in Prof. John Elder's lab at TSRI has already developed a good 3' processing assay for HIV integrase. :)

Their data on the induced fit caused by drug binding supports the importance of our conclusions on the more rigid G140S/Q148H mutant of HIV integrase.

PFV integrase seems to have a catalytic Tyr in the active site, while in the HIV integrase system, His67 is more likely to be the catalytic residue. See our discussion in JMB on the infectivity of Y143 mutants versus mutants of H67.


Thus, I am still confident that we are targeting the best representations of HIV integrase in our new experiments on FightAIDS@Home.

Thank you all very much for your interest and your help,
Alex L. Perryman, Ph.D.
[Apr 22, 2010 6:38:23 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread