Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 5561
|
![]() |
Author |
|
David Autumns
Ace Cruncher UK Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 11062 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Returned my first Solar powered results yesterday
----------------------------------------Just 1% of the UK's power is coming from coal today and we have run for weeks without coal this year. With a reasonable breeze Wind outguns Nuclear Power in the UK 2:1 Won't make any difference to the Climate but it is nice to be environmentally friendly. Roll on payday when I can attach the next panel 100W panel netted 400W's from the sky yesterday. Doesn't sound like much but that will power my laptop for over 24 hours. Technological improvements on my roof. technological improvements in efficiency of processors and ... free results ![]() ![]() |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
With a reasonable breeze Wind outguns Nuclear Power in the UK 2:1 No it doesn't, I keep a regular eye on https://gridwatch.templar.co.uk/ and have done for a long time, it can certainly produce more than nuclear but 2:1 simply isn't correct, nuclear stays between 5.5 and 6Gw and only changes during maintenance and refueling, highest i've ever seen wind is about 8Gw. |
||
|
David Autumns
Ace Cruncher UK Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 11062 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Have a look now Wind 2.14 : 1 over Nuclear - you are right 2:1 isn't correct
----------------------------------------![]() Wind 11.59GW Nuclear 5.52GW Wind currently generating 35% of the electric to type this I have seen it over 12GW and it will keep on increasing https://gridwatch.templar.co.uk/ ![]() [Edit 3 times, last edit by David Autumns at Aug 16, 2019 11:58:03 AM] |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Yeah, and now it isn't, so you were right for all of 2 hours, go you, well done
----------------------------------------![]() [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Aug 16, 2019 4:35:35 PM] |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Have a look now Wind 2.14 : 1 over Nuclear - you are right 2:1 isn't correct ![]() Wind 11.59GW Nuclear 5.52GW Wind currently generating 35% of the electric to type this I have seen it over 12GW and it will keep on increasing https://gridwatch.templar.co.uk/ Still think that wind turbines and most importantly all the switchgear around them will save the planet? Meet a gas called sf6, it’s 23,500 times more warming than Co2, guess where it’s used a lot? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-49567197 [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Sep 15, 2019 8:07:29 AM] |
||
|
GeraldRube
Master Cruncher United States Joined: Nov 20, 2004 Post Count: 2153 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hello all, This thread has been reported for violating the Communication Guidelines. Specifically: 'Respect your audience. This includes not only the obvious (e.g. no ethnic slurs, personal insults, obscenity), but also proper consideration of topics that may be considered objectionable or inflammatory, such as politics and religion. Don't pick fights or try to settle scores.' If the guidelines continue to be violated, this thread may be locked and possibly removed. Please help us and abide by the guidelines. (Here is a TLDR version.) Thank you, ErikaT Well I haven't been here for awhile-- Hiding in my safe space!! ![]() |
||
|
GeraldRube
Master Cruncher United States Joined: Nov 20, 2004 Post Count: 2153 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/11/15/an-ana...mouse-climate-scientists/
----------------------------------------An Analysis Of The 11,000 ‘Micky Mouse’ Climate Scientists https://i0.wp.com/synthesisr.org/wp-content/u...esize=700%2C401&ssl=1 ![]() |
||
|
GeraldRube
Master Cruncher United States Joined: Nov 20, 2004 Post Count: 2153 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
http://www.petitionproject.org/
----------------------------------------31,487 American scientists have signed this petition, including 9,029 with PhDs ![]() |
||
|
GeraldRube
Master Cruncher United States Joined: Nov 20, 2004 Post Count: 2153 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/who-are...391791658?i=1000456101653
----------------------------------------Who are the 11,000 “scientists” signing off on the latest global warming scare? We checked, and you'll laugh! Rebel Podcasts ![]() |
||
|
GeraldRube
Master Cruncher United States Joined: Nov 20, 2004 Post Count: 2153 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
That 97% consensus originated in 2009 in an AGU survey where 75 out of 77 “climate scientists” said humans were the cause. J. Cook perpetrates that with his bogus “analysis”, and is even quoted as No. 1 reference at NASA on their climate consensus page.
----------------------------------------https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/ ![]() |
||
|
|
![]() |