| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research
Forum: The Clean Energy Project Forum
Thread: algorythm granted too few points? |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 2
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Steve WCG
Senior Cruncher Joined: May 4, 2009 Post Count: 216 Status: Offline |
E000866_ 797C_ 009i03715_ 0-- 632 Valid 7/24/09 06:36:02 7/25/09 10:28:36 6.57 46.2 / 46.2
E000866_ 797C_ 009i03715_ 1-- 632 Valid 7/24/09 06:35:20 7/28/09 15:49:21 5.02 133.6 / 46.2 something is wrong with the credited points algorythm. I am sure it works in *most* cases but clearly not in this one. My i7 may be claiming a little bit high due to HT but from claimed 133 to granted 46 is not right. I can't imagine there is a CEP WU that could be processed for only 46 points. As for scoring 46 points for a WU in general ... maybe an old P3 crunching a fixed length project like RICE or HCMD but AFAIK CEP WU are not fixed length. |
||
|
|
smeyer55
Senior Cruncher Joined: Feb 15, 2009 Post Count: 303 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I've seen the same thing on occasion. It seems to be when your wingman claims a very different point value than you did. Then everyone gets the low value instead of the average.
----------------------------------------I've also seen it go the other way, where the wingman gets the higher value instead of the average. It does seem like there should be a minimum point value for CEP though. I think the lowest I've received on my i7 is 95 points for 6.37 hours. Another workunit that also took 6.37 hours got around 120 points. So the "same points for equal work" theory isn't quite working with i7 cores. Steve [Edit 1 times, last edit by smeyer55 at Jul 28, 2009 9:16:39 PM] |
||
|
|
|