| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 40
|
|
| Author |
|
|
GIBA
Ace Cruncher Joined: Apr 25, 2005 Post Count: 5374 Status: Offline |
3 until now. All with identical error and result log description, as follow:
----------------------------------------Result Log Result Name: E000887_ 715C_ 009k0650k_ 0-- <core_client_version>6.2.28</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> O sistema n pode gravar no dispositivo especificado. (0x1d) - exit code 29 (0x1d) </message> <stderr_txt> Calling initGraphics() INFO: No state to restore. Start from the beginning. Calling initGraphics() Encountered error. Exiting. </stderr_txt> ]]> =================== Result Name Device Name Status Sent Time Time Due / Return Time CPU Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit E000887_ 715C_ 009k0650k_ 0-- Secret Error 27/07/09 22:53:54 29/07/09 13:36:31 6.87 80.0 / 0.0 E000887_ 711C_ 009k0610k_ 1-- Secret Error 27/07/09 22:53:54 28/07/09 23:22:11 7.36 85.7 / 0.0 E000887_ 712C_ 009k0620k_ 0-- Secret Error 27/07/09 22:53:54 28/07/09 23:22:11 5.80 67.5 / 0.0 This machine are using BOINC 6.2.28 under Windows XP, and start crunch CEP just after finish DDDT1 jobs. All jobs with error are from E000887 distribution, and in this batch I got 2 WU's finished as valid. I will monitoring the companions and replicas to verify if will became errors too. ![]()
Cheers ! GIB@
![]() Join BRASIL - BRAZIL@GRID team and be very happy ! http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/team/viewTeamInfo.do?teamId=DF99KT5DN1 |
||
|
|
toss
Senior Cruncher New Zealand Joined: Jan 3, 2007 Post Count: 220 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Just a little update for information.
Since my last lost in this thread, I have rolled back to 6.2.28 but that didn't solve the problem. Have checked hardware (memtest etc) and can find no problem there. Both error machines now dedicated to Rice and running sweetly. Cheers Toss |
||
|
|
GIBA
Ace Cruncher Joined: Apr 25, 2005 Post Count: 5374 Status: Offline |
Any news from Techs about it ?
----------------------------------------Today got more two WU's finished in error after many hours of crunch... Too bad. ![]()
Cheers ! GIB@
![]() Join BRASIL - BRAZIL@GRID team and be very happy ! http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/team/viewTeamInfo.do?teamId=DF99KT5DN1 |
||
|
|
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: May 23, 2005 Post Count: 3952 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
We are looking into the issue.
GIBA, is your machine the only one in the quorum that had issues with these work units? I'm trying to find a work unit that had multiple computers fail with this error as it'll make figuring out the issue easier. -Uplinger |
||
|
|
GIBA
Ace Cruncher Joined: Apr 25, 2005 Post Count: 5374 Status: Offline |
Hi Uplinger,
----------------------------------------I have both situations. I don't know if is important or not mention it, but I have some WU's from this same distribution in this same machine which finished results as valid. Take a look at my sample with quorum data: 1) E000887_ 716C_ 009k0660k_ 0-- Secret Error 27/07/09 22:53:54 30/07/09 13:49:35 7.15 83.3 / 0.0 Result Name App Version Number Status Sent Time Time Due / Return Time CPU Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit E000887_ 716C_ 009k0660k_ 3-- - In Progress 30/07/09 13:56:42 03/08/09 13:56:42 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 E000887_ 716C_ 009k0660k_ 2-- - In Progress 28/07/09 17:53:45 02/08/09 00:12:11 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 E000887_ 716C_ 009k0660k_ 1-- 632 Error 27/07/09 22:54:27 28/07/09 17:52:16 7.49 90.8 / 0.0 E000887_ 716C_ 009k0660k_ 0-- 632 Error 27/07/09 22:53:54 30/07/09 13:49:35 7.15 83.3 / 0.0 2) E000887_ 715C_ 009k0650k_ 0-- Secret Error 27/07/09 22:53:54 29/07/09 13:36:31 6.87 80.0 / 0.0 Result Name App Version Number Status Sent Time Time Due / Return Time CPU Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit E000887_ 715C_ 009k0650k_ 2-- 632 Pending Validation 29/07/09 15:02:42 30/07/09 07:58:09 8.46 101.7 / 0.0 E000887_ 715C_ 009k0650k_ 1-- - In Progress 27/07/09 22:54:12 06/08/09 22:54:12 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 E000887_ 715C_ 009k0650k_ 0-- 632 Error 27/07/09 22:53:54 29/07/09 13:36:31 6.87 80.0 / 0.0 3) E000887_ 711C_ 009k0610k_ 1-- Secret Error 27/07/09 22:53:54 28/07/09 23:22:11 7.36 85.7 / 0.0 Result Name App Version Number Status Sent Time Time Due / Return Time CPU Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit E000887_ 711C_ 009k0610k_ 2-- 632 Valid 28/07/09 23:28:49 29/07/09 17:14:06 6.68 125.3 / 101.5 E000887_ 711C_ 009k0610k_ 0-- 632 Valid 27/07/09 22:54:35 29/07/09 03:40:06 4.53 89.0 / 101.5 E000887_ 711C_ 009k0610k_ 1-- 632 Error 27/07/09 22:53:54 28/07/09 23:22:11 7.36 85.7 / 0.0 4) E000887_ 712C_ 009k0620k_ 0-- Secret Error 27/07/09 22:53:54 28/07/09 23:22:11 5.80 67.5 / 0.0 Result Name App Version Number Status Sent Time Time Due / Return Time CPU Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit E000887_ 712C_ 009k0620k_ 2-- 632 Valid 28/07/09 23:28:42 30/07/09 04:25:02 5.22 122.3 / 111.2 E000887_ 712C_ 009k0620k_ 1-- 632 Valid 27/07/09 22:55:45 30/07/09 03:46:20 14.39 100.1 / 111.2 E000887_ 712C_ 009k0620k_ 0-- 632 Error 27/07/09 22:53:54 28/07/09 23:22:11 5.80 67.5 / 0.0 ... and so on ... ![]()
Cheers ! GIB@
![]() Join BRASIL - BRAZIL@GRID team and be very happy ! http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/team/viewTeamInfo.do?teamId=DF99KT5DN1 |
||
|
|
Steve WCG
Senior Cruncher Joined: May 4, 2009 Post Count: 216 Status: Offline |
on a PC that has never produced an error before:
E000860_ 553C_ 009j06312_ 1-- 632 Error 7/22/09 21:43:26 7/31/09 01:33:07 4.52 72.8 / 0.0 E000860_ 553C_ 009j06312_ 0-- - In Progress 7/22/09 21:42:35 8/1/09 21:42:35 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 I also have a couple on another PC but there were some recent oddities (switching between HT on / off i7) and I thought that may have casued computation errors but now after reading this post and seeing my rock solid machine through an error I am not so sure. There is nothing I can find in the logs that leads to a reason for this generic The system cannot write to the specified device. (0x1d) - exit code 29 (0x1d) on all instances. |
||
|
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7846 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
E000883_ 364C_ 009n03415_ 0-- 632 Error 7/27/09 06:41:19 7/28/09 11:11:07 9.81 76.9 / 0.0 Had one also a few days ago. So far the only one. All others have been fine. Both wingmen completed successfully. Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Hmmm,
have one WU (E000859_989C_009j01912_0) which exits with code 29. The system was halted when this WU reached 99.714% and I made a backup copy. Every time it restarts it runs (percentage increases from 90.16%) and then aborts with this error. All result files are available with status 1, boinc says 'Computation for ... finished' without any further message, but state shows 'Calculation error' and exit code 29 shows up in the <result> section of client_state.xml. I tested it with three different computers and it always terminates with exit code 29. Boinc version is 5.10.45. Anyone interested in further investigations? Otherwise I let the task upload and report tomorrow. 23 hours lost... :-( Matthias |
||
|
|
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: May 23, 2005 Post Count: 3952 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Just to let everyone know we are currently looking into the checkpointing for these work units as it appears that it is causing the bulk of the error 29's from what we can tell. We will let you know more as we debug this issue.
-Uplinger |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I have 2 machines spitting out the "exit code 29 (0x1d) error". One is a Q6600, the other is an i7. Not every WU though, some complete successfully. Both machines are overclocked so I have a feeling they need a touch more core voltage for this project. The reason I think this is because I have several other machines sitting in the same room, with the same hardware, OS and BOINC version that are not having any trouble at all with CEP. I'll report back with my findings.
|
||
|
|
|