| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research
Forum: Help Cure Muscular Dystrophy - Phase 2 Forum
Thread: The Help Cure Muscular Dystrophy Crunching Chart |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 603
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I also see increases in DCF * with a quad core running only HCMD2, up to 3.0 or so. It's a penalty of running a single project for which runtime is difficult to estimate in advance.
* Duration Correction Factor, in Properties on the Projects tab, in case anyone is wondering. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
As a learning point, maybe on a next similar project that uses this offspring construct, the parents and children and grandchildren could be given an A / B / C type of label with each their own flop estimates similar to what's done with the Px and Sx for DDDT2 C-Type. Not 100% sure, but client 7.0 or 7.2 could have "per science" type of DCF [looks to get deprecated]... a SDCF so to speak. Read http://boinc.berkeley.edu/trac/wiki/RuntimeEstimation, but to me it still does not answers how to treat hi variability within a single science... the non-deterministic part. It's long overdue to have something done about it, the way clients handle DCF for multiscience grids. WCG has been here 7 years now and Trac tickets at Berkeley have existed for years to fix this problem, reason why I keep cache in the 1.0 - 1.25 range, so it wont fly out of the "reliable" zone.
Meantime, we just crunch on. --//-- |
||
|
|
cjslman
Master Cruncher Mexico Joined: Nov 23, 2004 Post Count: 2082 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Meanwhile, I picked up...
----------------------------------------Parents of 2186 & 2189 Children of 2132 & 2157 Grandchildren of 2139 & 2160 crunch... crunch... crunch... CJSL |
||
|
|
cjslman
Master Cruncher Mexico Joined: Nov 23, 2004 Post Count: 2082 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Update: Just received parents for 2192 & 2194...
----------------------------------------Crunch... crunch... crunch... CJSL ---------------------------------------- [Edit 1 times, last edit by cjslman at Dec 15, 2011 2:36:01 AM] |
||
|
|
JmBoullier
Former Community Advisor Normandy - France Joined: Jan 26, 2007 Post Count: 3716 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
New refill of grand-children completed...
---------------------------------------- Highest batch numbers to-date here: - parents: Reported: 2194, In Process: 2194 - children: Reported: 2186 - grand-children: Reported: 2163, In Process: 2175 Oldest grand-child still In Process: 2119 |
||
|
|
pcwr
Ace Cruncher England Joined: Sep 17, 2005 Post Count: 10903 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
The oldest WU in my PV state is a 2135 WU that is waiting on its 3rd wingman.
----------------------------------------Patrick  |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
For the Friday update, in the last few hours I've downloaded:
Children for 2150 thru 2192 Grandchildren for 2130 thru 2177 |
||
|
|
cjslman
Master Cruncher Mexico Joined: Nov 23, 2004 Post Count: 2082 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Haven't received any parents in the last day, just the following children:
----------------------------------------2156 (3) 2159 (1) 2160 (1) 2170 (2) 2176 (1) CJSL |
||
|
|
Col323
Senior Cruncher Joined: Nov 4, 2008 Post Count: 372 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Haha! I loved it when the parents were away for the weekend!
I've had a run of child units which have completed between 15 minutes and 4 hours. I think we're doing a good job clearing out all of these units and we'll be pushing that leading edge beyond 2200 soon! |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Only 1 parent downloaded overnight, that was 2194, same as reported on 15 Dec by JmBoullier. The rest were children within 2142 thru 2192.
|
||
|
|
|