| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 16
|
|
| Author |
|
|
gio777
Advanced Cruncher Georgia Joined: Dec 8, 2004 Post Count: 72 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Just wondering if someone uses Core7 CPUs on this project, and whats the avarage time of completion of one work unit is?
----------------------------------------P.S on my quadcores avarage completion time is: 4h20Mins. ![]() |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Then again, our computers will get better and grid will grow. So we can shift it to 2 years top. Let's think positive. ![]() With positive thinking, not that our computers will get better and grow, so will the number of overall project (last I saw was 10 for this year) running on WCG so our computers will be busy crunching lots of different projects. If you want to see where the specific numeric pointers are heading for HCC, follow the project performance chart: http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/forums/wcg/viewthread?thread=18662. The average job run time creeping down indicates a mean increase in computing power. After the initial hick-ups, the average settled on 7 hours / task and now we're hitting the 6 hour mark, which happens to be a target that WCG has also set for FAAH, DDDT and RICE. I can't remember an announcement on re-cut of HPF2, but their average fell too... which could also be indicating a different experiment. See http://tinyurl.com/WCGART cheers Right now I complete each unit in 3.5 to 3.75 hours per unit on 4 quads, the duals are 5.5 hours. It's all I crunch since cancer hit my family, although I will deviate for a badge when they pop up. k.t. |
||
|
|
rr3507
Cruncher Joined: Jan 21, 2007 Post Count: 1 Status: Offline |
About the same (4h20mins) on my i7 but that is with 8 tasks running. The i7 has HT so it appears as 8 cpu's but only has 4 cores.
|
||
|
|
Jack007
Master Cruncher CANADA Joined: Feb 25, 2005 Post Count: 1604 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Welcome to the Forums RR3507
----------------------------------------and welcome to your I7 ![]() ![]() |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Wow, I wish...I really need to upgrade my server. I'm running a 2.8GHz P4 HyperThread...both "cores" running HCC and it is taking anywhere from 15 to 18 hours to complete a WU. But FAAH only takes about 8 hours per WU.
|
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Wow, I wish...I really need to upgrade my server. I'm running a 2.8GHz P4 HyperThread...both "cores" running HCC and it is taking anywhere from 15 to 18 hours to complete a WU. But FAAH only takes about 8 hours per WU. On Hyperthreaded it's to be expected that 2 HCC take 15 hours each, but that a result of broken timekeeping. Each just gets half of that time in real cycles, and probably explains paired down credit, if you wondered about that. Why FAAH is running 8 hours; maybe because it runs it alone, lacking room for a second job in memory to run concurrently?
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
|