Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 18
Posts: 18   Pages: 2   [ Previous Page | 1 2 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 4077 times and has 17 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta unit on linux machine

No.

In beta tests, all results matter, whatever the outcome.

You will only be advised to abort a work unit if something major is wrong, such as a task that never completes.
[Dec 8, 2008 11:32:11 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta unit on linux machine

eduardo.jayme, the output file was absent because the task failed, not the other way around.

Hope that gives you some insight into what is going on.

The result logs are already available to the techs, and the techs will be looking closely at any logs showing consistent errors.
[Dec 8, 2008 11:36:41 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta unit on linux machine

In beta tests, all results matter, whatever the outcome.


Not necessarily. If, as JmBoullier said, lots have "errored the same", there may be no point. This particular WU was originally sent out 3.5 days ago. One set of machines failed. Another set of machines failed. One gave up. Now the scheduler is trying again.

If betas from that time crashed consistently, the techs may already know what was wrong by now. (... or, if not, may have new betas to work out the specific conditions.)

The point of my question was to see if there were any useful replies from techs, not platitudes.
[Dec 8, 2008 11:47:02 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta unit on linux machine

The techs have already answered this question numerous times.

The answer hasn't changed.
[Dec 9, 2008 12:01:01 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta unit on linux machine

One of the platitudes is that distribution automatically stops at the 7th error.

That has not changed either. biggrin
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Dec 9, 2008 7:45:17 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta unit on linux machine

One of the platitudes is that distribution automatically stops at the 7th error.


I wouldn't call that a platitude. It's specific and useful information that I've not seen mentioned before.

And lucky me: Mine was the 7th to error out.
[Dec 11, 2008 10:56:57 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
widdershins
Veteran Cruncher
Scotland
Joined: Apr 30, 2007
Post Count: 677
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta unit on linux machine

Will there be another linux beta for CEP next week after the bugs are ironed out? If so I'll run down my que of other WU's over the weekend to be ready for action.

Ideally the final linux version would be released before Christmas. I like presents. biggrin
[Dec 12, 2008 12:23:44 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta unit on linux machine

JmBoullier wrote:
eduardo,
Many thanks for your detailed report. I think that the techs will appreciate.
The only things that you could add another time are the first message lines when you start a new session: they contain everything needed about your machine. But this time I have the feeling that it is not too important since most or all Linux beta WUs seem to have errored the same.

Cheers. Jean.


Didactylos wrote:
eduardo.jayme, the output file was absent because the task failed, not the other way around.

Hope that gives you some insight into what is going on.

The result logs are already available to the techs, and the techs will be looking closely at any logs showing consistent errors.


Many thanks for your replies, Jean and Didactylos.

Here are the first message lines when I start a new session (though I tend to agree with Jean that they are not too important this time, since most or all Linux beta WUs seem to have errored the same):

06-Dec-2008 06:22:02 [---] Starting BOINC client version 6.2.15 for i686-pc-linux-gnu
06-Dec-2008 06:22:02 [---] This a development version of BOINC and may not function properly
06-Dec-2008 06:22:02 [---] log flags: task, file_xfer, sched_ops
06-Dec-2008 06:22:02 [---] Libraries: libcurl/7.19.2 OpenSSL/0.9.8i zlib/1.2.3.3
06-Dec-2008 06:22:02 [---] Running as a daemon
06-Dec-2008 06:22:02 [---] Data directory: /var/lib/boinc
06-Dec-2008 06:22:03 [---] Processor: 1 AuthenticAMD AMD Athlon(TM) XP 2200+ [Family 6 Model 8 Stepping 1]
06-Dec-2008 06:22:03 [---] Processor features: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse syscall mmxext 3dnowext 3dnow up
06-Dec-2008 06:22:03 [---] OS: Linux: 2.6.27-ARCH
06-Dec-2008 06:22:03 [---] Memory: 503.36 MB physical, 384.33 MB virtual
06-Dec-2008 06:22:03 [---] Disk: 36.60 GB total, 28.53 GB free
06-Dec-2008 06:22:03 [---] Local time is UTC -2 hours
06-Dec-2008 06:22:03 [---] No coprocessors
06-Dec-2008 06:22:04 [World Community Grid] URL: http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/; Computer ID: ******; location: (none); project prefs: default
06-Dec-2008 06:22:04 [---] General prefs: from World Community Grid (last modified 31-Dec-1969 21:00:01)
06-Dec-2008 06:22:04 [---] Host location: none
06-Dec-2008 06:22:04 [---] General prefs: using your defaults
06-Dec-2008 06:22:04 [---] Preferences limit memory usage when active to 251.68MB
06-Dec-2008 06:22:04 [---] Preferences limit memory usage when idle to 453.02MB
06-Dec-2008 06:22:04 [---] Preferences limit disk usage to 1.86GB


Is the running time of those errored WUs going to be computed? The result disappeared from my "Results Status" page after some days. I'm looking forward to getting my beta badge. wink
[Dec 17, 2008 9:56:59 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 18   Pages: 2   [ Previous Page | 1 2 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread