| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 17
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Col323
Senior Cruncher Joined: Nov 4, 2008 Post Count: 372 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
We live in a christian society based on the belief on one God as 90% or so believe. It is through this belief system that humans are born into sin, commit sin and asking for God's forgiveness as it's the only true righteous way to eternal light or life. So with that being said, if someone acquires an HIV infection it is because they have sinned or somehow been associated with someone who sinned? So through this system they must must be forgiven by God or be damned for all eternity in hell. I fail to see the connection you have made. The Bible states that all people are sinners, but that doesn't mean we all will acquire HIV. Likewise, admitting your sin and becoming a Christian does not guarantee you any perks on earth. I've known Christians who have died of cancer and many other tragic deaths. Most normal society has no sympathy for those who are: disabled, mentally ill, economically disadvantaged, physically ill, diseased or otherwise weak. The reality is they somehow figure you probably deserved it by putting yourself in that situation as you have failed to take proper responsibility. I'm not sure by "normal society" you mean Christians (by your 90% figure in your opening paragraph) or just people in general. Taking the general populace, I know some very kind and generous non-Christians, and I know some curmudgeonly Christians - or at least people who say they are. But you shouldn't look at what "Christians" tell you or what some random guy on the internet says. Take a look at the Bible and Christ's attitude towards those you described. That should be our model - whether you claim to be a Christian or not. Part of the effort we stand behind arguably looks to undue the sins of God and therefore is a sin within itself. If we help find a cure for AIDS then we have taken away the power of sin and the punishment, at least here on Earth. This is my personal opinion from interviewing many people from public on these types of issues. Just my thoughts as well. I hope this comes across in a friendly manner, I really mean the best by my comments and wish to spark helpful conversation. (Sometimes that doesn't come across well in writing.) And as others have pointed out, you will get a variety of responses on the percentage of Christians in the US, what it looks like to be a Christian, and how science interacts with Christianity. But in your research, I would take time to read scriptures on the life of Christ. There's much more valuable information in what he did and said than you'll get from people on a message board. All of us are just human with our biases and shortcomings. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Hello Col323
No, it doesn't mean that all people who are sinners acquire HIV infection, a disease, disability or incur some form of human suffering. But, most of normal society who are Christian's that I talked with seem to view that the person must have done something terribly bad(committed sins) and they are to blame for their own condition. Also, furthermore stuff like this doesn't happen to people who live a good "honorable and pure" life. Basically, I have run into to very much indifference or disinterest relating to curing disease, especially using a home computer. Yes, the punishment of God might be more accurate and thanks for the correction. Yes, you are one of the very few people in normal society that believe in making a REAL effort to find cures for cancer and such. I have choosen the WCG over other projects due to the targeting of diseases I believe are very important to understand and cure. We are the great minority of society who is willing to at least attempt to make a difference. To a good degree I believe the belief in God and belief in scientific progress don't mix well together. Not to alienate anyone who believes in religion, but there is a long history of Christianity hindering scientific progress and supporting propaganda when needed as a compensatory measure. |
||
|
|
Col323
Senior Cruncher Joined: Nov 4, 2008 Post Count: 372 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Hi rbolo29, thanks for your response!
I guess I would agree that we should take responsibility for our actions, and understand that our actions have consequences. I would imagine that people saying that curing HIV removes a potential consequence to a sexually promiscuous lifestyle. But if anyone has commited sin and not accepted Christ and his sacrifice to cover their sin, then they have the consequence of an eternity in hell, which is much worse than years of a debilitating disease. Of course, the nonbeliever can respond that they don't believe in heaven and hell, which pretty much makes that arguement come to a standstill where neither side budges. But let's step back from all that heavy thinking. First of all, as Christians, I think we are the ones who should be worried about consequences to our actions, and not worry or care if actions of the unsaved seem to go unpunished. I think God holds Christians to a higher standard, since they are supposed to know what's right. Likewise, I don't think it's the job of the Christian to condemn others. Somehow convincing a person to stop whatever sin won't get that person into heaven, but showing them how God does love them and has a seemingly too easy way to get to heaven can. I do recall many stories of Christ healing or showing compassion to people. I don't recall any of them where he stopped to think, "Hmm, how many lies has this person told, or how many people has this person slept with?" before he acted. And if people want to go the "If you're living a good and pure life, you won't have to worry about these things" route, let's consider the world around us. You can never drink a sip of alcohol and still be killed by a drunk driver. Likewise, a person can life the "honorable and pure" life, and still be raped by someone with an STD. Did those people "deserve" what happened? (Not asking you, but the people who use this arguement.) Finally, thanks for the little pat on the back for running WCG. I think it's something we can do, and I do wish more people would. I know plenty of people (Christian and not) who have no interest in something like this for numerous reasons (think it will harm the computer, increased energy usage/costs, not being computer savvy and thinking it takes a guru to keep it running, etc), but pretty much all think it's a good thing that I do. However, I realize that we have a long way to go and we may not see a breakthrough in my lifetime. But still, given the option of doing something or not, I'd rather have my computers doing something. And every contribution adds up! |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
We live in a Christian society........ You may do so but the vast majority on this planet do not, so please do NOT make incorrect generalisations! We all live in a society that is mostly monotheistic Is that better? The Creator/Evolver is the same whether called G*d, J***s, A***h, Nature or the Great Architect of the Universe. The one thing the Supreme Ruler can not do, being already everything conceivable at any time or place and with any function, is reproduce, so what pronoun can we use for a name? Not "He" or "She", since these are words implying a sexual function, and one who is already everything can not reproduce. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Col323, you argue well, and your views do you credit (reflecting well on your faith, too). If everyone who professed to a religion took a similar view, the world would be a different (and much better) place.
But I think the very foundation of this thread is based on a myth. AIDS may have first been discovered in the gay population, but calling it a gay disease or blaming all the victims for risky behaviour is simply wrong.
|
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Likewise, a person can life the "honorable and pure" life, and still be raped by someone with an STD. Did those people "deserve" what happened? (Not asking you, but the people who use this arguement.) It would have been good to just end it with Didactylos last comment, but I had to add this. The ladies here in Albuquerque, NM are their own unique, level headed thinking breed. They believe in taking personal responsibility to guard against rape means going out to a club or bar with a "plan." A plan that they all agree not to let each other get too drunk, go home with a guy or otherwise do anything too stupid. Furthermore, a lot will take tae kwan do, run and stay in shape and they even have free self defense classes for the ladies in this city. Also, they believe in staying out of potentially compromising situations in which they might end up looking stupid. Employers even have policies for walking their coworker out to her car and such. They don't take stair wells or any places that could compromise their safety, they mostly go out at night with 'safety in numbers' tactics. They are free handbooks for staying safe in cities for ladies. So yes, consider it mean or not, but I've heard a few ladies here say a women deserves it if she puts herself in a compromising situation and ends up looking stupid(being raped). |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Also, most of these ladies here believe in "falling in love" as a safe way to date. A guy here must prove himself usually around friends or her family for months if not years in this city generally for a higher quality women. A lot will typically date from work or an inner circle(network) of friends. "When in doubt go with what you know is safe." I think these barriers do serve as a mostly effective safety network against rape. But, dont get me wrong that it does happen, there are statistics to prove it does...especially on campus.
|
||
|
|
|