Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 12
Posts: 12   Pages: 2   [ Previous Page | 1 2 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 4275 times and has 11 replies Next Thread
rilian
Veteran Cruncher
Ukraine - we rule!
Joined: Jun 17, 2007
Post Count: 1460
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
confused Re: Excessive length wu - 200 hours? - mb329_00000_1

btw, does HPF2 use the latest Rosetta algorithms ?

I do not know just where the fork is. We had our version in 2006. Rosetta is constantly changing.

so is there a high possibility that 1. results may be not very precise 2. there may be waste of computing resources because outdated algorithm spends much time on potentially incorrect folding which may be detected and aborted by heuristics in latest algorithms?
----------------------------------------
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by rilian at Jan 19, 2009 9:58:46 AM]
[Jan 19, 2009 9:58:14 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Excessive length wu - 200 hours? - mb329_00000_1

No!

It is vital that each entire experiment be conducted using the same algorithm. When we launched HPF2, we updated to the latest Rosetta version so that the scientists could conduct higher resolution experiments. In the future, we can update again if the scientists need it.

However, when critical problems are found, then the techs can and do update the code on the fly. A brief beta test, and you see a new application version on the grid.
[Jan 19, 2009 10:28:11 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 12   Pages: 2   [ Previous Page | 1 2 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread