Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 12
Posts: 12   Pages: 2   [ Previous Page | 1 2 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 1566 times and has 11 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Fewer results produced per day under Linux

What is the average runtime value? Glancing down the column, it looks like a little below 2 days, which is exactly what I would expect from a dual core.

Yes, one day it only reported 17 hours - but the next it got 3 days and 11 hours - you have to average it out.

The low result count is presumably due to the large work units.

If you are still worried that BOINC is cutting out, then try and find a processor graphing utility. Sorry, I don't know what to recommend for Linux - perhaps someone else has a recommendation?
[Aug 12, 2008 9:08:40 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Fewer results produced per day under Linux

I used a GNOME applet for that. It useful for reminding me I'm an idiot and that rebooting turns coolnquiet back on.
[Aug 14, 2008 4:12:52 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 12   Pages: 2   [ Previous Page | 1 2 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread