depending on the day, better 48hours or 72 hours ^^ When releasing at frighday after 15 oclock i have no chance to change it until Monday 7 oclock ^^

Unfortunately all I can say is I will try. For beta we do not announce that information. I can't give you an exact time on releases as there usually isn't one. It's based on how the priorities of the day/week happen. Also, my fear on pre announcing is that something will come down and the version would change from 7.05 to 7.06. Then you the user might see 7.05 and think all is good and have an issue because I released it as 7.06. There are too many variables to say "yes I will do that" but asking in the beta forums is a good way to get me to give you a generalized unofficial pre-announce for what application version will go to production.

I have mentioned in another thread, we are learning about app_info files and the side affects as the members let us know. Releasing a beta and causing a machine to go dry was not our intent as we did not know that would occur. So learning from that and move forward.

Thanks,
-Uplinger

TY for the reply,
My only concern was that somehow the app_info stuff was evading the projects ability to achieve an expected statistical delta for results since HCC1. Validation must be infra-structure demanding given the volume of results since inception of HCC1.
My results as reported through WCG have only a few icidents involved with getting app_info set up. Good and solid since... But that's just the 'front door' ;)

They do not at this point show up as more points in my BOINC when I look at requested/allowed. That being said... There is no increase on hardware when they show (increasingly more often now) and that means I can let my HW run without constantly messing with settings. The reduced load on the project infrastructure works for me and if any more is needed, I say go for it .
I have been through the whole "but my points" thing in many projects since '07. If mine dropping a bit means more science capabilities and less expense on project infra-structure, then drop mine.
I find medical (cancer mainly) projects to donate because it's my personal choice. BIG points are pretty cool tho, that I'll admit. In the end, find what you believe in and the points won't matter so much.

Ie... I could crush Boinc points if I went to Prime grid. but it's not for me. God bless those there that feel it's for them.

Do what you can for what feels right for you. Judge yourself by only yourself where contribution #s go. There's a ton of people to help you do the best you can with what you have. And just as many to help you make decisions when thinking on upgrades.

KK.. nuff of this nonsense. I just LOVE this place

Cool and thanks for taking time to be this involved in a public forum.
I don't particuliarly care about the points either way :) Cancer is a project that I care about and follow boinc projects that do related research. I'll be here for the duration of HCC1, both to speed up the science as well as my Team rank, and mine if it works out that way. lol.
I should have put something into my previous post to delineate my response to you and the rest of devoted rambling :)
Sorry... HCC project is doing great things. 1st to embrace the GPU power in this type research.
For The Cure !!!