| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Support
Forum: Suggestions / Feedback
Thread: Credit adjustment |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 20
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Your earlier quoted global stats are an average of 0.002776 per second/core or 9.9936 for the E6750, barely deviating from your WCG value of 0.002754 or 9.9144 per core/hour for same device.
----------------------------------------Global: http://nl.boincstats.com/stats/boinc_host_graph.php?pr=bo&id=2393323 WCG: http://nl.boincstats.com/stats/host_graph.php?pr=wcg&id=2527 Can you post for my indulgence the Duration Correction Factor for WCG and the Time Stats. Both can be found in the client_state.xml. Something is not jiving.
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
rebirther
Cruncher Germany Joined: Nov 19, 2005 Post Count: 29 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Your earlier quoted global stats are an average of 0.002776 per second/core or 9.9936 for the E6750, barely deviating from your WCG value of 0.002754 or 9.9144 per core/hour for same device. Global: http://nl.boincstats.com/stats/boinc_host_graph.php?pr=bo&id=2393323 WCG: http://nl.boincstats.com/stats/host_graph.php?pr=wcg&id=2527 Can you post for my indulgence the Duration Correction Factor for WCG and the Time Stats. Both can be found in the client_state.xml. Something is not jiving. Ealier device was my P4, I have used the same BOINC folder, copied from old PC to the newer one, BOINC has overwritten the old host with newer one. <time_stats> <on_frac>0.904073</on_frac> <connected_frac>0.004992</connected_frac> <active_frac>0.999984</active_frac> <cpu_efficiency>0.982243</cpu_efficiency> <last_update>1189440562.796875</last_update> </time_stats> from wcg: <duration_correction_factor>1.269334</duration_correction_factor> |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
obscure, but to say that your system takes 28 percent longer to compute a unit versus what your benchmark suggests.
----------------------------------------As for that E6750 on WinXP, the global stats say it was first seen on Aug.28'07 and the particular line having a cpu/sec credit of 0.009781 or 35.21 per hour. http://www.boincstats.com/stats/boinc_host_graph.php?pr=bo&id=2763184 Cant say i trust that 35 per hour much. Speculating, you shot yourself in the foot by copying things over and what was formerly known as a P4, now actually being a E6750. As said, WCG looks at claim history and by switching the ability under the same ID may have upset the system. The longer looking at this, the less it seems to add up, so I stop looking for a while until  makes its appearance.
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
Movieman
Veteran Cruncher Joined: Sep 9, 2006 Post Count: 1042 Status: Offline |
obscure, but to say that your system takes 28 percent longer to compute a unit versus what your benchmark suggests. As for that E6750 on WinXP, the global stats say it was first seen on Aug.28'07 and the particular line having a cpu/sec credit of 0.009781 or 35.21 per hour. http://www.boincstats.com/stats/boinc_host_graph.php?pr=bo&id=2763184 Cant say i trust that 35 per hour much. Speculating, you shot yourself in the foot by copying things over and what was formerly known as a P4, now actually being a E6750. As said, WCG looks at claim history and by switching the ability under the same ID may have upset the system. The longer looking at this, the less it seems to add up, so I stop looking for a while until makes its appearance.Maybe a simple total uninstall/reinstall will help his situation??  |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Can you name a few projects and a deivce reference, where you are actually getting 21cr/hr/core. Also looked at some of your devices, but see none immediately. You have 0.002641 on lattice equalling 9.5076 per hour per core, which is still lower than what I'm getting here at WCG for a slower C2D. The machine with 9.5/hour per core is a Pentium D 3.0. As I said before, for such machine 9.5 is fair. A bit on the high side, but ok. For my C2D see this: http://boinc.gorlaeus.net/results.php?hostid=11285. You can see that the machine clainms even 25-26 per hour (I insist: on a standard Boinc client) and gets about 20. [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Sep 10, 2007 5:16:01 PM] |
||
|
|
rebirther
Cruncher Germany Joined: Nov 19, 2005 Post Count: 29 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I have installed now 5.10.20 over my existing 5.8.15, hope there are no problems at all, 5.8.15 was stable by me. I can make a wcg project reset to get better values (reset term debts and duration correction factor) what you are looking for.
|
||
|
|
Saenger
Advanced Cruncher Germany Joined: Dec 28, 2005 Post Count: 66 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Can you name a few projects and a deivce reference, where you are actually getting 21cr/hr/core. Also looked at some of your devices, but see none immediately. You have 0.002641 on lattice equalling 9.5076 per hour per core, which is still lower than what I'm getting here at WCG for a slower C2D. I've got a similar puter, a C2D6750, running currently @3,6GHz (but I'm still testing the OC-ability). I claim (and get) ~20C/h. There are some projects, that are rather Linuxfriendly, there I get more, up to 50C/h in Seti optimized, QMC between 35 and 60 (the longer the WU, the better the rate), Cosmology 40, CPDN 35, Einstein 30, ABC and Simap 25, malaria and WCG 20, Lattice and RCN 18, Leiden 15 and yoyo 14. It seems to be something either with Win or with some strange setup on your puter, rebirther. Edith says I run ubuntu 7.04, boinc 5.10.8 stock client ---------------------------------------- [Edit 1 times, last edit by Saenger at Sep 11, 2007 8:12:15 PM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
the credits should be focused in the Boinc workshop in Geneva.
----------------------------------------Let's see what will be released as the result... thanks, suguruhirahara [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Sep 11, 2007 8:31:05 PM] |
||
|
|
rebirther
Cruncher Germany Joined: Nov 19, 2005 Post Count: 29 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I ran now 2 WU`s (faah) on vmware (ubuntu 6.06.1 64bit), the result was:
2.22h= 53.0cr 2.61h= 62.1cr against windows (dddt) : 4.30h= 56.7cr 3.77h= 47.2cr On linux these values I have expected then in windows. All BOINC versions are the latest official ones! |
||
|
|
rebirther
Cruncher Germany Joined: Nov 19, 2005 Post Count: 29 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Nothing changed so far:
faah on win: 1.95h=30.7cr 2,49h=37.1cr You can compare with the results above on linux  |
||
|
|
|