| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 38
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Have asked in back-room to pass the question to the dr. Added: Word came back a reply is in the making after the periodic project update meeting with DDDT researchers. Thanks Sekerob ![]() |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
It's back again
dddt0101a0176_ ZINC03796073-0000_ 04_ 4-- dddt0101a0176_ ZINC03796069-0000_ 01_ 2-- dddt0101a0176_ ZINC03796073-0000_ 05_ 2-- dddt0101a0176_ ZINC03796084-0000_ 00_ 3-- <core_client_version>5.8.16</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> Maximum disk usage exceeded </message> ]]> |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
What size was exceeded according the message log?
----------------------------------------Have several of these '176' in queue so i'll be watching thanks
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
What size was exceeded according the message log? Have several of these '176' in queue so i'll be watching thanks 10/14/2007 1:41:51 AM|World Community Grid|Starting task dddt0101a0176_ZINC03796069-0000_01_2 using dddt version 510 10/14/2007 1:49:24 AM|World Community Grid|Aborting task dddt0101a0176_ZINC03796069-0000_01_2: exceeded disk limit: 99.48MB > 95.37MB 10/14/2007 1:49:24 AM|World Community Grid|Deferring communication for 1 min 0 sec 10/14/2007 1:49:24 AM|World Community Grid|Reason: Unrecoverable error for result dddt0101a0176_ZINC03796069-0000_01_2 (Maximum disk usage exceeded) |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
exceeded disk limit: 99.48MB > 95.37MB A disk usage limit of 95.37 MB is really small. It would be better to allow several GB. On my computer, I think I allow 3GB. Lawrence Correction: Ignore this post. Sekerob pointed out what I forgot. ![]() [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Oct 15, 2007 2:15:49 PM] |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Lawrence, it relates to the internal dddt setting.... see post by i think uplinger. Was already increased once from about 77mb. There are seemingly still more strings needing added space for some work units. My first 176 is nearly finished (8 minutes to go) so will know shortly if it's batch specific. Think to have seen the 99mb exceed error reported once or twice before.
----------------------------------------Added: The first '176' ran through fine and validated.
WCG
----------------------------------------Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! [Edit 2 times, last edit by Sekerob at Oct 15, 2007 3:30:42 PM] |
||
|
|
knreed
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: Nov 8, 2004 Post Count: 4504 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
We have doubled the disk limit. About 15 workunits were impacted by this problem. We are re-running them with the larger disk space limit and will investigate further if they error out again.
|
||
|
|
Diana G.
Master Cruncher Joined: Apr 6, 2005 Post Count: 3003 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Lawrence, it relates to the internal dddt setting.... see post by i think uplinger. Was already increased once from about 77mb. There are seemingly still more strings needing added space for some work units. My first 176 is nearly finished (8 minutes to go) so will know shortly if it's batch specific. Think to have seen the 99mb exceed error reported once or twice before. Added: The first '176' ran through fine and validated. My one and only '176' just validated. ![]() ![]() |
||
|
|
|