Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 13
Posts: 13   Pages: 2   [ Previous Page | 1 2 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 1566 times and has 12 replies Next Thread
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Boinc 5.8.17 or Boinc 5.8.16 ???

There was and yesterday 59 returns came thru.... even after knreed advised the beta was a success and to 'life' for HPF2 on MAC & Linux was announced.
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Apr 27, 2007 12:27:15 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Boinc 5.8.17 or Boinc 5.8.16 ???

Okay, I'm dense.

Anyway, there seems to be a pattern here. It's hard to see with all the unusual stuff happening. Two reports of "deprecated application" and one crash, a beta test AND an untested client.

Anybody think HPF2 is the culprit - again?

I shall refer the techs to all three incidents.

edit:

No, I'm wrong again. The first report of this was *before* the beta test. Looks like the beta isn't implicated.
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Apr 27, 2007 12:50:56 PM]
[Apr 27, 2007 12:42:00 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
sunfolk
Master Cruncher
Super Kiwi Socialistic Empire Of Jacinda
Joined: Oct 8, 2006
Post Count: 1769
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Boinc 5.8.17 or Boinc 5.8.16 ???

Still not gone to bed, must do that soon, in the mean time.......
The standard suse 10.1/bash/Konsole/terminal (just like Midnight Commander did) is now reporting lots of info regarding HPF phase 2 5.19 that looks like this:
initializing full atom coordinates
initializing full atom functions
[T/F OPT]Default FALSE value for [-soft_rep]
[T/F OPT]Default FALSE value for [-soft_rep_design]
[T/F OPT]Default FALSE value for [-smooth_etable]
[T/F OPT]Default FALSE value for [-reduce_templates]
[T/F OPT]Default FALSE value for [-gen_born]
[T/F OPT]Default FALSE value for [-small_radii]
[T/F OPT]Default FALSE value for [-use_bw]
[T/F OPT]Default FALSE value for [-use_aw]
[T/F OPT]Default FALSE value for [-dna_weights]
[STR OPT]Default value for [-fa_lj_rep_slope] highres.
Reading ../../projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/hpf2.bbdep02.May.sortlib.gz
Reading ../../projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/hpf2.plane_data_table_1015.dat
.gz
Reading ../../projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/hpf2.pdbpairstats_fine.gz
Reading ../../projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/hpf2.Paa.gz
Reading ../../projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/hpf2.Paa_n.gz
Reading ../../projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/hpf2.Paa_pp.gz
generating Etable...
Starting energy table calculation
Energy table parameter set: polh_aroh Revision: 1.2 Date: 2006/10/24 22:38:08
[T/F OPT]Default FALSE value for [-mod_hhrep]
[T/F OPT]Default FALSE value for [-output_etables]
[T/F OPT]Default FALSE value for [-mod_etable]
Finished calculating energy tables.
Reading ../../projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/hpf2.avgE_from_pdb.gz
[T/F OPT]Default FALSE value for [-score_contact_fullatom]
[T/F OPT]Default FALSE value for [-long_range_hb_weight]
[T/F OPT]Default FALSE value for [-short_range_hb_weight]
[REAL OPT]Default value for [-omega_weight] 0.5
starting score 2804.38062 rms 0
starting full atom minimization
[INFO] pct=0.773


Anyway thats it, I'm of to bed. Happy cogitating folks! Allan
----------------------------------------


[Apr 27, 2007 1:15:17 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 13   Pages: 2   [ Previous Page | 1 2 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread