Login
Register
All Activity
Questions
Unanswered
Tags
Users
Ask a Question
Welcome to the Developer Q&A for the
MultiChain
blockchain platform.
Please feel free to ask questions about the platform to receive answers from the MultiChain developers or other members of the community.
Related questions
Invalid parameter set for blockchain wont allow me to run multichaind -daemon
Cold Node Error: ERROR: Parameter set for blockchain chain1 is not valid.
multichaind - ERROR: Parameter set for blockchain XXXX is not complete
What is the purpose behind the 'Key' parameter in {"for":stream,"key":"...","data":"..."} ?
Invalid permission for Per-Asset privileges
4,157
questions
4,370
answers
5,718
comments
Most popular tags
multichain
streams
assets
stream
transactions
json-rpc
blockchain
wallet
permissions
error
address
raw-transactions
asset
mining
node
api
issue
multichain-explorer
nodes
connect
multichaind
multisig
transaction
smart-filters
metadata
private-key
atomic-exchange
multichain-cli
multichain-web-demo
data
connection
performance
blocks
demo
web
json
database
storage
native-currency
bitcoin
private-blockchain
network
fee
smart-contracts
wallets
signrawtransaction
off-chain
exchange
multiple-nodes
getnewaddress
setruntimeparam allows invalid parameter for autosubscribe
+2
votes
See PR:
https://github.com/MultiChain/multichain/pull/56
Greetings,
Alex
asked
Apr 1, 2018
by
Alexoid
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
Please
log in
or
register
to answer this question.
2 Answers
0
votes
Noted - thanks for the comment. We'll aim to fix in the next maintenance release.
answered
Apr 2, 2018
by
MultiChain
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
0
votes
Version 1.0.5 of MultiChain has just been released, and it should fix this.
answered
Jun 7, 2018
by
MultiChain
Hi.
Same issue for startup parameter -autosubscribe, but I don't know how much input validation you want to provide here.
Just FYI.
OK, thanks. There is a broader question of command line parameter validation that this is just a part of. For now we have adopted a liberal policy where unknown parameters and invalid values for them are ignored.
Ok. Maybe this is a special case, since the invalid value is not completely ignored since it is returned when querying getruntimeparams.
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
...