data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df1d0/df1d077e80ebefa0d09800245e06882e3818a9f8" alt="Waiting :waiting:"
Here's the full article link:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100109/ap_ ... WFuaW5vZG8-
Nobody really knows the DC sniper's motives except for him and he's not talking.jjenni08 wrote:I think he meant after 9-11. Just didn't say it that way. I personally think it was a slip of the tongue.![]()
The DC Sniper wasn't terrorism or a domestic "attack". That was some idiot just committing a criminal act. And as far as the show bomber. That dude was on a plane coming to the US. We didn't scan him in and allow him on a plane. This is also the case with the Christmas bomber on Obama's watch, so those equal each other out.
AnnOminous wrote:Nobody really knows the DC sniper's motives except for him and he's not talking.jjenni08 wrote:I think he meant after 9-11. Just didn't say it that way. I personally think it was a slip of the tongue.![]()
The DC Sniper wasn't terrorism or a domestic "attack". That was some idiot just committing a criminal act. And as far as the show bomber. That dude was on a plane coming to the US. We didn't scan him in and allow him on a plane. This is also the case with the Christmas bomber on Obama's watch, so those equal each other out.
You don't have to look internationally for terrorist attacks. The Animal Rights Activists have done plenty of property damage. They just haven't killed anybody. And how about that anti-abortion guy who shot the doctor in church? Those are all home grown terrorists.
Laura wrote:Dude, Rudy isn't the only one saying that. President Bush's former Press Secretary said the same thing back in November . . . that there were no terror attacks under President Bush.
I've had it with ALL politicians - from the very top right down to my local school board members.
jjenni08 wrote:AnnOminous wrote:Nobody really knows the DC sniper's motives except for him and he's not talking.jjenni08 wrote:I think he meant after 9-11. Just didn't say it that way. I personally think it was a slip of the tongue.![]()
The DC Sniper wasn't terrorism or a domestic "attack". That was some idiot just committing a criminal act. And as far as the show bomber. That dude was on a plane coming to the US. We didn't scan him in and allow him on a plane. This is also the case with the Christmas bomber on Obama's watch, so those equal each other out.
You don't have to look internationally for terrorist attacks. The Animal Rights Activists have done plenty of property damage. They just haven't killed anybody. And how about that anti-abortion guy who shot the doctor in church? Those are all home grown terrorists.
Although all of those incidents could "technically" be described as "terror"-ism, the term is generally reserved for use in politics, military, and war only. Any act of crime that is commited against civilians to invoke fear can be considered an act of terrorism. Used in the politics, military, and war way, there have generally speaking, been no terrorism acts domestically since 9-11.
The anti-abortion guy (in my opinion) did not do what he did to invoke fear into civilians. In my opinion he is just another wacky person, looking to express his opinions in a hurtful way rather than a rational way, like we are currently doing.