Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 11
Posts: 11   Pages: 2   [ Previous Page | 1 2 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 2109 times and has 10 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Inconclusives on most recent FAAH beta tests

ozylynx, in the previous round of beta testing, when the AMD/Intel problem was identified, some work units were paused part way through, without enough results agreeing for a quorum. Because the results returned already were probably a mix of AMD and Intel, it is really a matter of luck whether the final verdict is valid or invalid when the beta was restarted with a new version.

It may have been wiser for WCG to award credit for all the messed up beta work that had been done, and start fresh with new work units for the new version. However, that's not what happened, as far as I know.

edit: typo
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Nov 8, 2006 9:53:08 PM]
[Nov 8, 2006 9:52:40 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 11   Pages: 2   [ Previous Page | 1 2 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread