| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 3
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I posed a question somewhere (although I can't find the post) regarding how many structures do we predict for each HPF WU (once it's rolling again). I found the answer in Dr. Bonneau's preliminary paper, in case anyone is interested:
The client tries millions of shapes and returns to the central server the best 500 shapes it can find. |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
hmmmm that's HPF, but the one we're waiting for is the resumption of HPF2 which is at much higher resolution.....they also took considerable more time.
----------------------------------------Open the search box middle top of forum pages, copy past your 'old' sig EXACT, caps and all, and put a keyword u remember in the box above. Should list only your posts. cheers Added: Here's a post by Lawrence: Hi arcane63, Dr. Baker points out that if each amino acid is allowed 3 states of rotational freedom (and in reality there are more) then a protein with 100 amino acids presents us with 3 to the 100th power possibilities to explore. Keeping that in mind, I think that each work unit comes with its assigned random seed and with a required number of . . what shall I call them? - iterations. Right now we have withdrawn HPF2 while we put in all the bug fixes that the Baker Lab has made in Rosetta these last few months. I am uncertain whether or not this changes the basic algorithm any, but I strongly suspect that there are some fairly major changes. Lawrence [Aug 16, 2006 5:14:44 PM
WCG
----------------------------------------Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! [Edit 1 times, last edit by Sekerob at Nov 1, 2006 6:24:52 PM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Thanks Sekerob - I should've stuck with one name on this forum & sister project for consistency but couldn't make up my mind
![]() |
||
|
|
|