| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 5
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Hello!
I am not a biologist and not really familiar with all that stuff related to biochemics. If my question is answered elsewhere please provide a link to that information. (Did not find the answer by searching this forum) As I understand it, we are searching for a compound (part of a drug?) that best targets the protease of as many HIV-Viruses as possible as inhibitor. The HIV protease consists of a protein chain that is folded in a specific way in a likewise manner as all those proteins we folded in HPF project (am I right?). So if we finally find the key to inhibit the HIV protease, who tells us what this compound does to all those human proteins? If there are any reactions with the human proteins, I imagine very serious side effects. Or will there be another project (or project phase) to check the found compounds against the human proteins? Greetings Thorsten |
||
|
|
jamescjones@hotmail.com
Cruncher Joined: Nov 20, 2005 Post Count: 1 Status: Offline |
I am not sure what the project is going to do once it finds a protien that will inhibit the virus. But I would have to believe that there will be another phase for testing that protein for negative effects on the rest of the human enviroment. The project seems very determine to test all aspects to get things correct.
|
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
FAAH is just a computational screening test. The results are available for anyone to proceed with additional development and eventual clinical testing. Our information is not proprietary.
Lawrence |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
There would definitely be another phase to test the compounds found in earlier phase(s) but it won't necessarily run as a distributed computing project. Some of the compounds might be eliminated because they are too difficult to synhesize or too difficult to deliver. Others might be eliminated because they are obviously "poisonous". Testing the remaining candidates might not be the kind of problem that can be modeled on a computer easily. If it can then I suspect it would not require the massive computing power provided by the grid. I am far from an expert on such matters, just offering some thoughts.
|
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Many a DC project intertwined, here a post from Rosetta@home's today: Message from David Baker in his journal Quote:
----------------------------------------It is an exciting time in the lab now as we are recovering from the craziness of CASP. While Bin and Rhiju are taking an incredibly well deserved vacation, the new HIV vaccine design project is starting to come into full swing. We now have computationally designed amino acid sequences for 15 potential vaccine candidates, and we will start the process of making them next Tuesday; the first step is to synthesize genes which encode these proteins. We have also designed a whole series of novel enzymes which catalyze a wide variety of reactions, and are starting the gene synthesis process for these as well. I'm particularly interested now in designing enzymes which destroy organophosphate compounds which are the key ingredients in many pesticides and nerve agents. On rosetta@home, we are carrying out calculations in which we are resampling regions of the landscape found to be low energy in initial sets of runs and we hope these will lead to significant improvements in our abilities to find global minima.
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
|