Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 3
|
![]() |
Author |
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Scientists have for years said that the human DNA is more than 99% identical between other humans and even Apes and a few other species... has that estimate been proven true? If so... couldn't we run a computational effort to determine every possible DNA sequence? I realize that this could be stepping on the toes of privacy issues... but at the same time... if every possible human dna sequence is available in a database... then it becomes possible to determine who would likely have any of a number of genetic problems. Or even who would be more susceptible to diseases, and the rare individual with immunities to dangerous diseases. 1% of the human dna sequence is still alot... but nothing that couldn't be done.
Lyos Gemini Norezel |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
The simplest known bacterium has 477 genes. These genes are encoded on 570 080 nucleotide pairs. Scientists know the functions of 297 of these genes.
----------------------------------------Do you know how many possible combinations that allows for? In contrast, the human genome consists of 3 billion base pairs, representing an estimated estimated 20 000 - 25 000 genes. Your approach won't work as you describe, but by studying the human genome it is possible to target and understand critical areas of it. Already, we can test for certain hereditary diseases. Edit: This may be slightly misleading, since Mycoplasma genitalium isn't diploid - but I'm sure you get the idea. Generating all possible combinations of known active alleles in the human genome would be a) impossible and b) pointless. Doing a similar task at the nucleotide level (even allowing for non-variant portions) would be infinitely harder. Perhaps you could clarify exactly where you were going with this idea? [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Apr 13, 2006 6:14:12 PM] |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Not exactly a computational approach but with the continuing fall of the costs of sequencing a human genome there are plans appearing for sequencing the genome of more individuals. The cost is still too high to do it on any wide scale (approx $20million for a complete human genome) but still drastically less than the several billion the human genome project.
It is likely with the current trend in falling prices and the appearance of technology such as lab on a chip devices that we could reach a cost of a few thousand per genome within 10 years. At this point it would be feasible to sequence complete genomes of a large number of people from diverse backgrounds, ethnic groups and so on. If you then link this with detailed information on medical conditions and family history you can start looking for genetic similarities between groups on a genome wide scale. This could lead to important insights into genetic predispositions to illness and so forth. Not really what you were talking about but has some similarities and sounds like it could be a promising approach to me. There are of course downsides to this widespread sequencing including some major privacy issues to assess, but also some other positives such as the ability to tailor medical treatments to individuals based on their genetic information. |
||
|
|
![]() |