Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 36
Posts: 36   Pages: 4   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 3648 times and has 35 replies Next Thread
keithhenry
Ace Cruncher
Senile old farts of the world ....uh.....uh..... nevermind
Joined: Nov 18, 2004
Post Count: 18667
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: "Speeding up" Boinc results

Ah, I'm going to get pulled over to the dark side it seems, no matter what I try biggrin Okay, to make sure I have this right (and hopefully for the benefit of others who will want to do this), I currently have a shortcut in my Startup folder that starts BOINC Manager each time I boot up. It invokes "C:\Program Files\BOINC\boincmgr.exe" so it sounds like I want to add another shortcut PRIOR to it in my Startup folder that invokes this: "C:\Program Files\BOINC\boinc.exe" -return_results_immediately so that would start the BOINC client (boinc.exe in task manager) with that option. When BOINC Manager starts after that, it sees that the BOINC client is already running and doesn't bother starting it. One question, in the same c:\Program Files\BOINC folder, there's a boinccmd.exe as well. That is apparently the command line interface version of BOINC. I don't need to be starting it instead of boinc.exe, right?

Net is, once this is working, I'll have the BOINC client crunching away and automatically reporting results immediately after it uploads them, my Connect to Server setting will ensure that I have enough but not too much work to make sure I always have WUs to crunch on even during things like server/network/DSL outages (except in extreme cases of course). Also, my Connect to Server setting won't delay results being reported and thus possibly delaying reaching a quorum for validation. Sound right?
----------------------------------------
Join/Website/IMODB



[Apr 17, 2006 11:41:10 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: "Speeding up" Boinc results

Bah. It doesn't seem to work.

*sigh*

*goes away to reinstall VS.NET, CVS and all that jazz*
[Apr 18, 2006 9:32:01 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
retsof
Former Community Advisor
USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2005
Post Count: 6824
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: "Speeding up" Boinc results

I am usually too busy working to look at my Boinc Manager. I have noticed that after completing a work unit (WIN XP Pro, not on a network) that sometimes a completed work unit will just "sit there" for some time while another work unit is being crunched.
I have noticed that sometimes it will not send anything for 1/2 hour or so. I'm not worried about it, since I have it set to store 2 days worth of pending workunits to cover any maintenance, server outages, etc. I have not watched continuously, since I am disconnecting and swapping out three computers on the same phone line, and want to see whether the others need anything.

In the meantime, BOINC must not trust me to finish what I've got. I saw this in my message log this morning:

Sending scheduler request...
Reason: To fetch work
Requesting 0.48527 seconds of new work
----------------------------------------
SUPPORT ADVISOR
Work+GPU i7 8700 12threads
School i7 4770 8threads
Default+GPU Ryzen 7 3700X 16threads
Ryzen 7 3800X 16 threads
Ryzen 9 3900X 24threads
Home i7 3540M 4threads50%
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by retsof at May 8, 2006 4:55:57 PM]
[May 8, 2006 4:50:55 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: "Speeding up" Boinc results

See the thread Validation Delay ???? for amplification of what happens /could happen ...... when i'm at my machine and see something sitting there waiting to be send, i just hit "Project Update" in Boinc on the main tab.
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[May 9, 2006 2:08:29 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: "Speeding up" Boinc results

I am usually too busy working to look at my Boinc Manager. I have noticed that after completing a work unit (WIN XP Pro, not on a network) that sometimes a completed work unit will just "sit there" for some time while another work unit is being crunched.

Are my Boinc settings/options correct? I believe it is the default settings. Could it be changed to rectify this "waiting" process?


Use Truxoft BOINC from http://boinc.truxoft.com. It has an option to report results immediately and you set that option in a config file. That's much easier than starting BOINC from the command line with the report immediate parm and then starting BOINC manager later (though you might automate it in a .bat file, i suppose).

Truxoft BOINC has other options you can spec in the config file, eg. task priority.
[May 12, 2006 9:07:34 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: "Speeding up" Boinc results

Assuming that you have network connectivity 24/7, I have to look to at your Do Work Only After Computer is Idle for x Minites being set to 3.0. That could introduce a delay, not only for reporting results but also for crunching them too. I'd set that to 0.


But his Do Work When Computer Is In Use option is set to Yes which means (according to the BOINC option setup at SETI) that the Do Work Only After Computer Is Idle For X Minutes value gets ignored. I assume that works the same for WCG as it does for SETI but perhaps I am mistaken.
[May 12, 2006 9:16:29 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 36   Pages: 4   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread