| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 6
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Is there any article somewhere discussing the positives and negatives of using the BOINC agent and the UD agent.
Hope someone comes up with something useful |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
There is so much to say, that I don't think anyone has ever gathered it together in a pro/con style. The current consensus is, UD is fine if you use Windows and are not concerned about anything more complicated. UD is easy to install, and easy to use. Otherwise, the advantages of BOINC make it the favourite.
The headlines: BOINC
|
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Hello Dharwish,
The UD client is a very simple and well-tested Windows program. It just works. However, it lacks many interesting options. It is resolutely single-threaded, so it does not make full use of dual cores or multiple processors. It requires some work to run it as a service. Alternatively, it is fairly easy to run as a Scheduled Task. If you want to download a number of work units and return them in batches, you have to install UDMon and learn how to use it. The UD client allows you to run in screensaver-only mode if you allow the WCG screensaver to run on your machine. There is a simple way to throttle projects running under the UD client to a set percentage of the CPU. BOINC is easy to install as a service and can run as many threads as you have processors or cores. It is easy to set up to run batches of work units (though this can introduce a number of complications). To throttle it, you have to use a third-party utility, such as ThreadMaster. BOINC does not compress files before transmitting them by default, the way UD does. BOINC, in fact, contains a number of bugs, though the number is rapidly declining. BOINC is already available for several different Operating Systems and comes with a good network management utility. This is my idea of a simple compare-and-contrast. Lawrence |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Well judging from what lawrencehardin has to say, i think ill stay with the current UD client im using.Thank u sir for your kind help
|
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Oh, don't be misled. UD has bugs, too - and a few conflicts with other software, particularly virus scanners.
The big problem with UD is it is proprietary, and United Devices seem unwilling to make any changes or fixes. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Until now I have'nt experienced any conflicts with other programs while runnind the UD agent.Guess ill have to wait and watch.Anyway until i see some solid results im not migrating to BOINC.
Thanks for ur concern Didactylos. |
||
|
|
|