| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research
Forum: Human Proteome Folding
Thread: extra long work unit/s ? |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 10
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
52 hrs 29% on my pent 4 runns at 3ghz,, still going is this a test run for hpf2??? or just a real long w/u? at this rate it will be an all time record for me for one w/u.. just me or anyone else finding similar? prob be 150 hrs all up best guess..
|
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Hi retep57,
We are not running any unannounced test runs for HPF2. You can read Dr. David Baker's journal about Rosetta@home here: http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/forum_thread.php?id=1177 You have simply run into an unusual protein in a configuration that converges very slowly. Lawrence |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
 Hi LawrenceI have a FAAH work unit that is currently running under UD Manager that is 17% after 46 hours  At this rate it will take 270 hours to complete |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
32% after 63hrs, hmm eta >180hrs , shoud we continue with ones like this? timed out risk? cheers, is running "little lines move"
|
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
i've had a couple of big ones lately too, but now they are all back to a smaller 6 hours or so. i would just keep crunching it.
|
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I am also running Climatepredition.net
It takes 2000hours to finish..... |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
wow 200 hrs is that normal for them? oh well as long as it helps and work unit no t fall, over, i might have to eat humble pie as this is 38% at 72 hrs,, decent climate prediction capability has potential to save lives etc , help commerce, farmers etc, and of course those of use who just want to have a good weekend outdoors cheers
|
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
i've had a couple of big ones lately too, but now they are all back to a smaller 6 hours or so. i would just keep crunching it. My problem is that my computer starts geting lots of sleep during the summer. Here, in Florida, we have many thunderstorms. I don't leave my computer on for more than about 4 or 5 hours a day. My computer is slow enough to begin with. Rosetta work units average 35 to 45 CPU hours. At about 80 hrs, I start to worry about the reporting deadline. I am using 40% of my resources for simap work units, but I would hate to "punish" simap for having short work units. How do the FightAIDs@HOME work units compare to rosetta in time and or reporting deadlines? Do teams discus issues like this? Jack I only started this stuff about 3 weeks ago. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Click on Statistics - By Projects then select each project. Under Averages look at Run Time per Result.
HPF = 9 hours and 1 minute FAAH = 9 hours and 5 minutes Several months ago I used my calculator on the statistics for Yesterday and came up with a run time similar to the overall project average. Lawrence |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Click on Statistics - By Projects then select each project. Under Averages look at Run Time per Result. ........ Lawrence Thanks Lawrence I will have to check out the average run times of more projects. My VIA C3 700 mhz CPU is a Intel Clone. I have been told that functionally it's equal to a 300 or 400 mhz Intel I think that set points are also causing me a problem. My CPU runtime was 6:11 and completion was at 8.77% before I shut the computer down for the night. This morning my CPU runtime restarted at 4:42, while completion remained at 8.77%. My best explanation for the missing 90 minutes is widely placed set points. Hopefully I will be back after the thunderstorm season or better yet when I get a new computer. I have had this one for about four years. Jack |
||
|
|
|