| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 3
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Since we are attempting to simulate the attachment process (docking) of various ligands to the HIV-1 protease for this project (or maybe phase of this project?) I was just curious as to how we might gauge our overall progress.
Is there a finite number of ligands to test or that we plan on testing? I know it's still way early but it there a kinda phase 2 plan for closer scrutiny of "good fits" similar to HPF? I'm glad to help out, even if my laptop can only contribute a tiny incremental difference. I'm not expecting that if and when we're done with fa@h that we'll have a cure for AIDS. I guess I'm just one of those people who likes to know that I'm making a difference, even if its small. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
check out the links in this chatroom forum discussion...................
http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/forums/wcg/viewthread?thread=4705 |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Hi adroc,
We are going to have to wait and see what the scientists at TSRI say about this. Scripps announced the project Monday, so it will probably be a while before they start handing out details. My personal, uninformed opinion - - the new AutoDock 4.0 is a vast change from the circa-1999 AutoDock 3. They will have to see what sort of results it gives them before they can rationally decide just how large or small a territory they want to cover. Leading edge research programs are notoriously fuzzy this way. mycrofth |
||
|
|
|