Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 101
Posts: 101   Pages: 11   [ Previous Page | 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 20335 times and has 100 replies Next Thread
NixChix
Veteran Cruncher
United States
Joined: Apr 29, 2007
Post Count: 1187
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: [Error] ATOM syntax incorrect: "62 " is not a valid atom number

This has gone on for 3 weeks now. Why haven't the defective Wus been pulled yet?

Cheers coffee
----------------------------------------

[Jun 7, 2023 4:47:37 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 4, 2006
Post Count: 7846
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: [Error] ATOM syntax incorrect: "62 " is not a valid atom number

Only 5 so far today, and 25 yesterday.Maybe we are running out of this batch.
Cheers
----------------------------------------
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers*
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Sgt.Joe at Jun 7, 2023 2:33:42 PM]
[Jun 7, 2023 2:33:11 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Crystal Pellet
Veteran Cruncher
Joined: May 21, 2008
Post Count: 1403
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: [Error] ATOM syntax incorrect: "62 " is not a valid atom number

I switched one laptop from Windows 10 (running DENIS@home) back to Linux running from a USB-stick to get some SCC1's, cause SCC is running terrific on Linux. First I got 2 tasks from batch 4089 and 4099. Then 1 of 4176 crashing immediately and 2 minutes later another 4176 going down the drain too. Those 4 tasks were all quorum 1.
2 errors and my machine got irreliable, I think, from now on getting only quorum 2, however also 2 4176-tasks that were quorum 1 again. Those I could abort before starting. I've to create some cache buffer to intercept the ATOM 62's to make my machine reliable again.
[Jun 7, 2023 5:24:22 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
sptrog1
Master Cruncher
Joined: Dec 12, 2017
Post Count: 1592
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: [Error] ATOM syntax incorrect: "62 " is not a valid atom number

I received 5 more 4176 C tasks today. Hopefully they are running out.
[Jun 7, 2023 11:19:40 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
adriverhoef
Master Cruncher
The Netherlands
Joined: Apr 3, 2009
Post Count: 2346
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: [Error] ATOM syntax incorrect: "62 " is not a valid atom number

While we're halfway(*1) faulty batch 0004176, I just noticed that Replication has been set to 0 for all type C workunits from that batch, e.g.:

workunit 311933876
App: Smash Childhood Cancer
Workunit: SCC1_0004176_MyoD1-C_0893
Created: 2023-05-28T07:06:09
Quorum: 2
Replication: 0

SCC1_0004176_MyoD1-C_0893_0 Linuxmint Error 2023-06-01T21:35:04 2023-06-01T21:38:12
SCC1_0004176_MyoD1-C_0893_1 Linux Ubuntu No Reply 2023-06-01T21:35:14 2023-06-07T21:35:14
SCC1_0004176_MyoD1-C_0893_2 Linux Debian Error 2023-06-01T21:38:17 2023-06-02T06:19:28
SCC1_0004176_MyoD1-C_0893_3 Fedora Linux Error 2023-06-02T11:00:53 2023-06-02T11:03:15
SCC1_0004176_MyoD1-C_0893_4 Linux Debian Error 2023-06-02T11:03:49 2023-06-03T17:14:59

And a recent one:
workunit 314246927
App: Smash Childhood Cancer
Workunit: SCC1_0004176_MyoD1-C_49178
Created: 2023-05-31T22:19:24
Quorum: 1
Replication: 0

SCC1_0004176_MyoD1-C_49178_0 Fedora Linux In Progress 2023-06-08T14:03:37 2023-06-14T14:03:37

This hasn't happened yet to batch 0004174 (also type C):
workunit 318804187
App: Smash Childhood Cancer
Workunit: SCC1_0004174_MyoD1-C_16902
Created: 2023-06-08T11:37:39
Quorum: 1
Replication: 1

SCC1_0004174_MyoD1-C_16902_0 Waiting to be sent

[*1] Each batch runs from sequence 0 to 99,999.

Adri
----------------------------------------
[Edit 3 times, last edit by adriverhoef at Jun 8, 2023 2:47:37 PM]
[Jun 8, 2023 2:44:57 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 4, 2006
Post Count: 7846
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: [Error] ATOM syntax incorrect: "62 " is not a valid atom number

From what I see of the progress through the batch it will be at least about 10 to 12 more days of this batch before it is through. That is if it continues at the current pace and if the sequence it follows it strictly sequential. But I could be entirely mistaken. Time will tell.
Cheers
----------------------------------------
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers*
[Jun 8, 2023 3:32:31 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Hans Sveen
Veteran Cruncher
Norge
Joined: Feb 18, 2008
Post Count: 983
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: [Error] ATOM syntax incorrect: "62 " is not a valid atom number

Adri, I just got this one,

SCC1_0004165_MyoD1-C_0467
same error as 4175/4176 batch!
[Jun 9, 2023 5:04:39 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
adriverhoef
Master Cruncher
The Netherlands
Joined: Apr 3, 2009
Post Count: 2346
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: [Error] ATOM syntax incorrect: "62 " is not a valid atom number

Indeed, Hans, while we're still ploughing through batch 0004176, there are other batches of type C waiting to get crunched and apparently batch 0004165 also crashes immediately.

This was my first one this morning:
workunit 314552778
App: Smash Childhood Cancer
Workunit: SCC1_0004165_MyoD1-C_0153
Created: 2023-06-01T09:44:55
Quorum: 2
Replication: 2

SCC1_0004165_MyoD1-C_0153_0 Linux GNOME Error 2023-06-09T01:53:14 2023-06-09T03:22:39
SCC1_0004165_MyoD1-C_0153_1 Linuxmint In Progress 2023-06-09T01:53:28 2023-06-15T01:53:28
SCC1_0004165_MyoD1-C_0153_2 Fedora Linux Error 2023-06-09T03:22:53 2023-06-09T03:25:00
SCC1_0004165_MyoD1-C_0153_3 Linux Ubuntu Error 2023-06-09T03:25:12 2023-06-09T07:40:53
SCC1_0004165_MyoD1-C_0153_4 Linux Arch In Progress 2023-06-09T07:41:05 2023-06-12T07:41:05
Details: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SCC1_0004165_MyoD1-C_0153_2  Fedora Linux  Error                 2023-06-09T03:22:53  2023-06-09T03:25:00
Logfile:
<core_client_version>7.20.2</core_client_version>
<message>
process exited with code 1 (0x1, -255)</message>
<stderr_txt>
INFO: result number = 2
INFO: No state to restore. Start from the beginning.
[05:23:01] Number of tasks = 1
[05:23:01] Running task 0,CPU time at start of task 0 was 0.000000
[05:23:01] ./cmpd-0000154.pdbqt size = 32 7 ../../projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/scc1.MyoD1-C.pdbqt size = 1268 0


Parse error on line 190 in file "../../projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/27295592b17b5fe8860fb8af4612becf.pdbqt": ATOM syntax incorrect: "62 " is not a valid atom number
VINA failed. rc = 1. Exiting

</stderr_txt>


Followed by:
workunit 314612178
SCC1_0004165_MyoD1-C_0629_0  Linux Ubuntu  Server Aborted        2023-06-09T04:01:39  2023-06-09T06:45:06
SCC1_0004165_MyoD1-C_0629_1 Linux Ubuntu Error 2023-06-09T04:01:50 2023-06-09T04:07:52
SCC1_0004165_MyoD1-C_0629_2 Arch Linux Error 2023-06-09T04:07:58 2023-06-09T04:59:08
SCC1_0004165_MyoD1-C_0629_3 Linuxmint Error 2023-06-09T04:59:32 2023-06-09T05:01:39
SCC1_0004165_MyoD1-C_0629_4 Fedora Linux Error 2023-06-09T05:01:46 2023-06-09T05:03:53

workunit 314650293
SCC1_0004165_MyoD1-C_1008_0  Linux Ubuntu  In Progress           2023-06-09T05:52:42  2023-06-15T05:52:42
SCC1_0004165_MyoD1-C_1008_1 Linux Debian Error 2023-06-09T05:52:47 2023-06-09T05:55:03
SCC1_0004165_MyoD1-C_1008_2 Fedora Linux Error 2023-06-09T05:56:43 2023-06-09T05:58:49
SCC1_0004165_MyoD1-C_1008_3 Linux Debian In Progress 2023-06-09T05:59:00 2023-06-12T05:59:00

workunit 314706662
SCC1_0004165_MyoD1-C_1451_0  Linux openSU  In Progress           2023-06-09T08:24:26  2023-06-15T08:24:26
SCC1_0004165_MyoD1-C_1451_1 Linux Ubuntu Error 2023-06-09T08:24:30 2023-06-09T08:26:39
SCC1_0004165_MyoD1-C_1451_2 Fedora Linux Error 2023-06-09T08:27:08 2023-06-09T08:29:16
SCC1_0004165_MyoD1-C_1451_3 Linuxmint In Progress 2023-06-09T08:29:32 2023-06-12T08:29:32

Adri
[Jun 9, 2023 8:46:24 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
adriverhoef
Master Cruncher
The Netherlands
Joined: Apr 3, 2009
Post Count: 2346
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: [Error] ATOM syntax incorrect: "62 " is not a valid atom number

Nice to see that somebody else (see task _3 below) also (probably automatically(*1) (see post 686915)) aborts incoming tasks from the 'new' faulty batch 0004174:

workunit 314654777
SCC1_0004174_MyoD1-C_0092_0  Fedora Linux  U.Aborted  2023-06-09T06:26:19  2023-06-09T08:50:47
SCC1_0004174_MyoD1-C_0092_1 Linux Debian Error 2023-06-09T06:26:24 2023-06-09T06:28:31
SCC1_0004174_MyoD1-C_0092_2 AlmaLinux Error 2023-06-09T06:28:56 2023-06-09T09:51:13
SCC1_0004174_MyoD1-C_0092_3 Linux Ubuntu U.Aborted 2023-06-09T08:51:15 2023-06-09T08:53:20
SCC1_0004174_MyoD1-C_0092_4 Linux Debian S.Aborted 2023-06-09T08:53:32 2023-06-09T09:58:21

[*1] Aborting them automatically will prevent your host from getting unreliable and sending out more copies of the same task to other clients once Replication has been set to 0. In the end, it also prevents sending out more tasks needing verification. Of course, as soon as the error has been fixed on the server and all faulty tasks have vanished, you can/should stop looking for these faulty tasks. Guarding against aborting the wrong tasks has been defined by looking for the 'signature' that concerns the 'faulty' batches (again, see post 686915).

Adri
----------------------------------------
[Edit 4 times, last edit by adriverhoef at Jun 9, 2023 4:23:15 PM]
[Jun 9, 2023 10:43:53 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
TPCBF
Master Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jan 2, 2011
Post Count: 2173
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: [Error] ATOM syntax incorrect: "62 " is not a valid atom number

Oh well, what do you know? Just in time for the weekend, yet another faulty batch (after 4175 and 4176, it's now 4174)...

And still crickets from WCG Towers... sad

Ralf
[Jun 9, 2023 2:29:01 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 101   Pages: 11   [ Previous Page | 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread